• @Deestan
    link
    581 month ago

    The term “scope creep” comes up a lot, but to be honest that’s not happening here.

    They have no scope in the first place. No coherent vision.

    The say surface-level vision-like things and present scope-like plans, but only as disposable tools to get investment. No single person in that company tries to tie it together to a real scope or real vision, or align development with it.

    Smart and capable people work on any random game-like stuff that they find interesting, in the hope that it will all somehow become a complete experience all by itself.

    • @pigup
      link
      431 month ago

      well we have concepts of a scope

      • @Noodle07
        link
        31 month ago

        We’ll hear about it in the not so different future please keep buying ships

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      341 month ago

      Scope creep commonly happens when there’s no clearly defined scope or vision that keeps the scope in place. Star Citizen clearly suffers from this. It’s a space sim game where seemingly anything goes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        You say scope creep, I say deliberate milking effort, but you know what?

        More power to them. Fool me for one year, etc.

    • @ChillPenguin
      link
      61 month ago

      The scope that exists is whatever nitpicking detail Chris Roberts is focusing on at any given moment. That blanket? Not enough physics. Water bottles have to have a glossy realistic shine. Server meshing…? But what about the coffee mugs?!

      It’s the fucking worst.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    551 month ago

    Star Citzen is proof that if the guys making the shadows in Plato’s cave got creative enough — people would come in from outside to sit and watch

  • comador
    link
    471 month ago

    Invested in 2012, refunded in 2016. Best move I ever made in a game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 month ago

      Same. If it ever releases I might pick it up but I don’t even do early access anymore nevermind 12 years of increasing expensive macrotransactions and glacial results

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 month ago

      It’s interesting that you frame it as a game move because the whole idea of Kickstarter is definitely a con.

  • @makyo
    link
    English
    451 month ago

    Will it be released before I can explore the galaxy in real life?

  • @lath
    link
    191 month ago

    Star Citizen is already getting ready for quantum computing. Why aren’t you?

  • @MehBlah
    link
    English
    21 month ago

    The same situation is was when it was conceived. Chris Roberts sucks at finishing a game and releasing it. Fuck him and he should be sued in a class action lawsuit.

  • @Nuke_the_whales
    link
    11 month ago

    Man, someone got filthy rich offa bunch of dumb gamers

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Can I kindly introduce you to an old games industry expo called E3? It’s not hard to make something look good in a controlled environment.

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      161 month ago

      The demo they showed is mostly a 1 hour cinematic with barely any gameplay. Fancy graphics, but if I want to watch a movie I watch a movie.

      • @Quetzalcutlass
        link
        English
        19
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There are two facts old space game fans could tell you about Chris Roberts: that he will never meet a deadline (one of the Wing Commander games, his claim to fame, only came out because the publisher got sick of his delays and forced a release), and that he desperately wants to be a Hollywood writer/director. Both explain Squadron 42.