Former President Barack Obama deconstructed some of Donald Trump’s playbook attacks while campaigning for Vice President Kamala Harris in Nevada on Saturday.

Speaking at a rally in Las Vegas, Obama accused the Republican presidential nominee and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), of leaning on scaremongering about immigration as an answer to any issue.

“If you challenge them, they’ll fall back on one answer. It does not matter what it is — housing, health care, education, paying for the bills — one answer: blame the immigrants,” he said.

“He wants you to believe that if you elect him, he will just round up whoever he wants and ship them out and all your problems will be solved,” he added.

He acknowledged that there’s a “real issue” at the border and elements of the system are “broken,” but criticized Trump’s approach.

“When I hear Donald Trump talk … he’s very quick to say to Kamala, ‘Well, you were vice president for four years,’” he added. “Dude, you were president for four years!”

  • socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    575 hours ago

    I need Obama to start saying “bruh”

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      253 hours ago

      I’m waiting for him to call someone a motherfucker

      • @Fedizen
        link
        41 hour ago

        Well next time gandalf steals his bicycle we’ll hear it.

    • @aceshigh
      link
      English
      31 hour ago

      When did bruh replace dude? I can’t believe dude is out of fashion :(

        • Rob T Firefly
          link
          English
          251 minutes ago

          Also, “dude” will still be “dude” in another 40 years while “bruh” will have faded from the lexicon and been replaced by a succession of a couple dozen other things.

  • @SleepyPie
    link
    516 hours ago

    “He couldn’t solve the problem because deep state.”

    There is no zinger, no matter how truthful, that will penetrate the average republican voter’s weaponized schizophrenia.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      42 hours ago

      If he can’t do anything about this deep state as president, maybe there’s no reason to vote for him.

    • GladiusB
      link
      34 hours ago

      So the deep state is still there and now you’re on the list.

      • billwashere
        link
        English
        64 hours ago

        Too? I think that’s their entire arsenal. No positive policies. Just fear mongering based on immigration.

  • @breadsmasher
    link
    English
    1039 hours ago

    does trump even remember he was president? i doubt he can remember last week

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    588 hours ago

    A president that left countless people to die to a pandemic and recommended that they inject bleach. Trump is a monster.

    • Optional
      link
      96 hours ago

      And that was only a few of his many, many crimes in office.

    • @seaQueue
      link
      145 hours ago

      They should have taken this approach 20+y ago

          • @seaQueue
            link
            111 minutes ago

            Nixon certainly didn’t help, that’s when Republicans really ramped up stoking discord for political gain. Our decision to get involved and then dig ever deeper into the Vietnam shit sandwich derailed so much potential social progress.

  • @shalafi
    link
    English
    -478 hours ago

    He acknowledged that there’s a “real issue” at the border and elements of the system are “broken,”

    If I say it, I get buried in down votes. Yes, we have a problem and it involves real people with real lives. Acting like the issue is 100% GOP bullshit isn’t helping to either fix the issue or help these people.

    For example, look at the downward trend for 2024. Well, that’s good news isn’t it? That’s 100,000 people the Border Patrol encountered trying to get in, in a single month. We have to talk about how we are to employ, feed and shelter that many people. And they are constantly flowing in.

    I have no idea how best to proceed, the logistics are boggling, but pretending nothing is happening is not a strategy.

    • @MegaUltraChicken
      link
      638 hours ago

      pretending nothing is happening is not a strategy

      No one is pretending that nothing is happening. The Democratic Party has proposed a variety of solutions and the GOP has blocked 100% of them. Everyone recognizes there’s a problem, but only one of the major parties is blocking progress on this specific issue.

      You’re getting down voted because you’re giving credence to the GOP argument that this is somehow due to lack of action by the current administration. There’s a problem with our immigration system AND the GOP is completely full of shit 100% of the time on immigration. Both are true.

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        -42 hours ago

        And the Democrats have zero plans as to how:

        we are to employ, feed and shelter that many people

        All I see from the left side of the aisle is more ways to prevent immigration. And once again, liberals have no clue that real lives are on the line and use this as a political football. Not nearly as bad as conservatives, but still, I’m not hearing how we deal with these folks once they’re here. All the Dems got is finer-honed blocking plans, nada about the humanitarian crisis.

        Notice how your comment says nothing about the real humans involved?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          32 hours ago

          Trump’s plan for the real humans involved is to deport them all. Which would take so much time that it would involve concentration camps.

    • TunaCowboy
      link
      9
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I wonder how much the influx of immigrants has to do with the GOP falsely claiming ‘the border is wide open, they’re letting everyone in!’ on an international stage at every opportunity for the past two decades.

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        32 hours ago

        I have no idea. I asked my Filipino wife how much American politics entered into her plans to come here. She told me that they’re really not aware of the political situation, don’t care, they just want to get here.

        I find that hard to believe, but there’s an anecdote, hell I know. We got a Honduran friend I’ll ask. Doesn’t speak a lick of English after 5-years stateside, but I’d be interested in what he can say. Cool note: That man walked for a month to get here. Probably getting away from homosexual persecution, whatever, he’s a brave man.

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        22 hours ago

        Uh, you can’t see the issue with 100,000 lives pouring into a country in a single month? OK.

        I’m from Tulsa, OK originally. Not exactly a cow town. You could fill that city in 4-months with that many people, and Tulsa has been around since 1836, not even 200-years. Or, fill Chicago in a little over 2-years (whew, that’s some rough back-of-the-napkin math!)

        Think a moment on the housing, food, sewage, power, water, etc. to provide for that many lives. It’s staggering and we keep loading more and more and more. Our population has increased by 138 million since I was born. That’s a 60% increase. You cool with the environmental and carbon increases?

        But hey! Pretend it’s not a problem. These people earn slave wages, pay taxes, get zero benefits, sound good? Don’t hear libs complaining about any of that. Modern slavery by any other words.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 hours ago

        I mean, I can see it being a logistical problem for the areas directly on the border if people that come in stay there instead of spreading across the country to avoid overtaxing local resources, but on the whole, one would think lots of people coming in would be a good thing. Immigration is what is keeping the country slowly growing instead of being in population decline the way many other countries are these days, and in general, more people does translate to more economic and military power as long as you can maintain the same per-capita economic conditions once they arrive. If anything, we should be trying to attract immigrants in my view

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          22 hours ago

          Yes! We need immigrants, but the logistical problems are a little more than you dumb down. See my comment here. We’re not slowly growing, we’re bulging at the seams. And I haven’t even touched on the environmental impacts of this population growth.

          It’s sticky as hell, and you seem to get that. Anyone with simple answers is just that, simple.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 hour ago

            I mean, the thing with the environmental impacts of it is that these people already existed, so any increase in climate impact from them is driven not by actual population growth in a global sense, but in people here having a higher quality of life. We need to decouple that from carbon emissions of course, but in the meantime, I dont know that “Some people who were incredibly poor are now a bit less poor” is really the worst reason for an increase in climate impact. 100000 a month is a bit over million people a year, which sounds like a lot, but when the country has over 300 million people, that is in the ballpark of a third of a percent. That doesnt seem like very much to me. It seems silly to say the country is “bursting at the seams” or “we’re full” as I sometimes hear people say in the same vein- when we have a lower average population density than the world as a whole. Countries like India and China manage well over 4 times that in a similar amount of space, and if we want to stay globally relevant in the long run in a world where there are countries with over a billion people that are rapidly developing economically, it seems to me that we would benefit from roughly similar numbers. If we can achieve this by allowing the impoverished from elsewhere to come, add the better aspects of their culture to ours like migrant groups have done before, and improve their quality of life while doing so (granted, actually treating immigrants to the standards we treat eachother is something we need to work on), that strikes me as win-win. Yes, population growth poses a strain on things like housing and public services, but we do have enough raw land, and the infrastructure is something that we can build, indeed, building it is itself something that can drive economic growth and job creation.

        • @Tujio
          link
          106 hours ago

          Goddamn welfare queens are trying to steal my job.