• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 hours ago

    “I don’t think Rotschy failed my son in any way,” Derrik’s dad said. “All these events culminated into this accident.”

    The fuck?? That kid never had a chance.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      217 minutes ago

      And by events, he means skirting of regulations, but sure, it was totally unavoidable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 hour ago

      Yeah that kid will look back in 15 years and wonder why the fuck his parents didn’t try to hold someone accountable. So many people failed to protect this child, he doesn’t even realize it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    153 hours ago

    Well the fact he still works there and that the parents don’t “blame” the company makes this prime boringdiatopia material.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 hours ago

      To be fair, they may have signed an NDA as part of their workers comp agreement. The prosthetics he has are pretty rare to see on people, as most private and socialized insurances won’t cover microprocessing knee units.

      The vast majority of the time when you see a high end powered knee unit on a guy that young, it’s because they had a workers comp case, or they got them at the Walter Reed veterans hospital.

      The knee looks like a Genium x3, which alone can bill for around 100k. His prosthetic feet bill for around 10k a piece, and then there’s probably another 50k for custom sockets.

      Even if he did harbor a grudge against the employer, in his position it would be difficult to rock the boat and potentially be on the hook for his acquired medical cost.

      It’s unfortunate, but I’ve definitely had a patient who was successfully sued for losing their leg at work. Word to the wise, don’t get hurt on the job in Kansas.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        225 minutes ago

        I kinda doubt they would be doing an interview like this is they signed a NDA. But maybe I am wrong.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    73 hours ago

    I grew up in Washington State. At first this sounded like WANIC, a program where high schoolers can learn trade jobs instead of taking 1/2 periods of class. I didn’t see it referenced at all in the article.

    It is a cool program though. You can do things like Fire Fighters Academy, learn construction skills (although not like this trenching stuff AFAIK). I took classes at DigiPen, a college for video games, and ended up going there after high school.

    If you have kids in school in WA, consider WANIC as it is paid by the state.

  • peopleproblems
    link
    365 hours ago

    Jesus that machine he was using looks like it would take off way more that just legs if it lurched.

    A bigger question I have is who the fuck has a 16 year old working construction??? I’m fairly certain there’s no way any of that kind of work falls into “legal for a minor to operate” especially considering minors aren’t even allowed to operate cardboard compactors at retail stores.

    • @SirSamuel
      link
      153 hours ago

      This is gross negligence by the boss, and it’s very very common in smaller construction companies and crews. Allowing a minor to operate heavy machinery is dumb illegal to start with, but the kid learned unsafe behavior from his coworkers, who likely never had any proper safety training themselves. Garbage in, garbage out. (Walk behind trenchers are shite anyway, pay the extra $50 to rent a ride-on trencher)

      There is a place for teenagers on a construction site, but it’s not in high risk areas or work. So much can be learned about work ethic, practical skills, and the challenging realities of construction without risking life and limb.

      I grew up in a construction household. My dad was a small time contractor. Custom homes, spec builds, one at a time, bank financed, that sort of thing. I go into that detail to say we weren’t rich, not even middle-class until I was almost graduated from high school (secondary school). Also this isn’t an endorsement for how I was raised, just my lived experience.

      I learned to run a skid-steer at 13. I was cutting lumber for the framers by the time I was 15. In many ways the skills I learned as a child set me up for success as an adult. But I also learned so many unsafe practices and endangered myself from a young age because of that casual familiarly with dangerous work and locations. The entirety of my twenties was spent unlearning bad habits and practices. I’m still working at it now.

      The only time teenagers should be working on construction sites is if the company has a very strong safety culture, which means they won’t put kids in high risk situations. Parents should absolutely be checking these things before allowing their kids to work

    • @fishos
      link
      English
      13 hours ago

      Now, I gotta ask… Why are you implying that it’s better for a person 2 years older to handle the same machine with the same lack of safety features/proper supervision? Everyone here is making a big stink about this being a “kid”, but a few years older and this is the reality for many many people. Also the same age we let them start driving… So why are you only seemingly outraged that it was a kid? Shouldn’t you be outraged that it could happen to anyone, and in fact regularly does, and is usually not given any attention?

      • peopleproblems
        link
        22 hours ago

        No, the reason is that minors have special protections because they don’t have the rights adults do. Most importantly, the kid cannot live independently without emancipation, and the kid has no voting rights. He cannot vote for representation that would improve his situation (regardless of who he voted for does it or not).

        However, as a minor, he is entitled to an education in the US, and knowingly putting his life at risk puts that education to risk. And people can argue until they are blue in the face about being in “life risking situations” but child labor laws have explicitly forbidden this sort of dangerous work because others profit off of it, leading to incentive to circumvent that entitlement.

        This isn’t just about safety, this is about rights. This is about law. And more importantly, this is about the interference of education when money comes into play.

  • vaguerant
    link
    fedilink
    616 hours ago

    Rotschy, which routinely hired teenage workers amid recent labor shortages, violated the law when supervisors assigned tasks known to be dangerous and prohibited for minors to perform.

    L&I later issued significant fines against Rotschy for the incident, but has for years approved special “variances” for the company to hire minors despite its history of serious safety violations.

    For their part, Derrik and his parents say they do not hold Rotschy responsible. It was a fluke, an unlucky break — not the company being neglectful, they said.

    “I don’t think Rotschy failed my son in any way,” Derrik’s dad said. “All these events culminated into this accident.”

    I hope they were paid very, very handsomely to say that.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      346 hours ago

      You have no idea how much corporate bootlickers love to bootlick. Even at the expense of their own kids.

      I guarantee you this guy is an avid Newsmax watcher.

      In fact, I’m suspicious of both of his parents:

      “I told Mom not to get angry … upset,” he interrupted, then paused. “What did I say?”

      and

      “I cut my legs off. Then, of course, she yells at me.”

      • @Whats_your_reasoning
        link
        32
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I got the same vibe. From the kid’s expectations and reactions, to the parents’ own words on the incident:

        “I don’t think Rotschy [the company] failed my son in any way,” Derrik’s dad said. “All these events culminated into this accident.”

        The kid is on defense from the moment he tells his mom that something bad happened to him, then his dad absolves the company of any wrong-doing. Healthy, loving, supportive families don’t react like that. If his parents aren’t chugging the kool-aid, I’d be astounded.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 hours ago

      Oh Rotschy. L&I isn’t the only regulatory agency penalizing them. I would not set foot in a building their crews constructed.

  • @NatakuNox
    link
    22 hours ago

    This is what passive violence looks like.

    • @Gigasser
      link
      246 hours ago

      Tbh, sounds like child labor to me even if it was “legal”. Like school credit for hours on a construction job wtf? Like I thought maybe he was some how doing a metal working/machinist class and somehow got fucked up by a lathe or something, but Jesus fucking Christ, what are you gonna learn doing construction work?

      • @SirSamuel
        link
        43 hours ago

        I learned to read a tape measure, covert fractions to decimal, practical application of the Pythagorean theorem, and quite a bit about the application of dimensions and measurement in three dimensional space.

        I didn’t think it’s bad for a kid to have a job, provided the hours are limited, do not interfere with schooling, and are integrated into school curriculum. Parents also have a duty to monitor the employer, and the employer should view the teenager as a trainee who might make the company money as an adult, not a source of direct profit.

        So, you know, a fantasy

      • @sunbrrnslapper
        link
        9
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I got school credit working at McDonalds. You learn all sorts of stuff, like how to show up on time (something I was shocked I would have to later teach people as a manager) and I personally learned the phrase “you got time to lean, you got time to clean” (which I use to this day to irritate my children). Obviously, no child should be put into a dangerous job, but you do lean some things by actually experiencing the work environment. And construction is a legit, respectable job/career that (if done right/safely) a teen could learn a lot from.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 hours ago

                You are supposed to learn more at school than just the classes. Among other things you should learn how to interact with other humans in a decent way, and how to not be tardy, how your actions affect others, and more

                Then again, we are talking about america

      • @MirthfulAlembic
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        There’s a ton of practical knowledge and skills a student could learn from a properly structured experience in construction. The focus needs to be on education first with productivity being a bonus, however, which I’m skeptical was the case here due to the outcome.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        116 hours ago

        Jesus fucking Christ, what are you gonna learn doing construction work?

        Wheelchair-based sports apparently.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      It looks in the same category as equipment like lawnmowers. That is, kids shouldn’t be operating them, especially not without close supervision and thorough safety training.

    • @Buffalox
      link
      15
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I couldn’t even read the whole thing, it made me too sick!
      I don’t know American regulation, but there is absolutely no way that would be a legal workplace here.
      Handling such machinery requires a certificate. Even a simple forklift does.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        20 minutes ago

        Sounds like it wasn’t legal there.

        But the place that’s going to illegally let a 16 year old use a ditch witch probably isn’t too concerned with proper safety training either.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        267 hours ago

        wanna know what’s really getting to me?

        There’s a very high chance he wasn’t even being paid a proper wage (it’s required that they’re paid minimum wage. But I doubt very much that they paid higher than that.) And, there’s a non-zero chance that somebody at the school or schoolboard was taking kickbacks for the cheap labor.

        in any case, looking at their Child Labor Laws would expressly forbid this.

        Specifically in non-agro:

        • Operating forklifts or other heavy equipment such as earthmovers, tractors, backhoes, etc.
        • Loading, operating, or unloading of paper/cardboard balers or compactors
        • Jobs where respiratory protection or hearing protection is required

        and in construction:

        • Wrecking, demolition, trenching, or excavating