The peer reviews are downright diabolical
“We enjoyed the discussion in which the author disseminated the fallout from vanquishing their foes, but we found their choice of method (‘Block out the Sun’) derivative of prior work ('Burns et al, 2005’) without citation.”
Burns et al 😂
The IRB rejects your experiment for not being unethical enough.
“Ugh, why did I even sign on for this evil postdoc position? I could be doing evil research in the private sector right now.”
In the evil private sector.
That’s redundant.
If you’re a medical doctor, then it would be the Medieval private sector
And if you like to jump over things on motorcycles, it’s the Evel private sector.
Good point, I can’t believe I messed that up!
Evil grants don’t apply for themselves. YET.
He’s left-handed like me
Simply build a Paperwork Organizinator
