• @Crazyslinkz
    link
    353 months ago

    Jeeps are not a go fast vehicle… there’s a thing called death wobble.

    • hash
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      Death wobble is truly terrifying. Seriously do not let a new driver behind the wheel of anything with a solid front axle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        My 2001 Landcruiser with over 1,000,000 kms on the clock had a solid front axle and never did anything like a death wobble. For that matter, nor did our ‘96 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Maybe the longer wheelbase helped

  • @TriflingToad
    link
    253 months ago

    I’m thinking entirely too hard for a meme about the aerodynamics of a pokemon, but there’s no way that a literal Bulbasaur can beat an actual car, right?

    • hotspur
      link
      fedilink
      453 months ago

      Bulbasaur has curves, jeep is a series of boxes. So very possibly bulbasaur wins.

        • hotspur
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I remember when I learned that jeep Windshields fold down not because it’s a cool lifestyle thing, but because it allows you to stack them on top of each other in the holds of liberty ships… didn’t have to worry about roll bars in ww2 I suppose.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Bulbasaur even has a sweet spoiler for that extra traction.

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      173 months ago

      Well to win, the jeep would have to be running, so most would be disqualified before the match even starts. If the ref is feeling nice they can allow up to 3 attempts to start the jeep.

    • @mkwt
      link
      113 months ago

      It’s not clear if they properly matched the Reynolds numbers and other similarity parameters to properly make this comparison.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      to be fair, the jeep is a car, and not a particularly aerodynamic one, and one that can go much much faster than a pokemon ever could conceive of so.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      I mean, no, but people do still drive them on highways, so the mildest resemblance of fuel efficiency would be nice.

    • @friend_of_satan
      link
      English
      43 months ago

      Tell that to the people driving the dirt road outside my neighborhood.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        You’re understanding how fast that road can be driven by a vehicle made to go fast on dirt roads!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t often see Jeep Wranglers, but they’re invariably driven by hairdressers and gay bar owners in my country

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    For aerodynamics, aren’t most cars are facing the wrong way?

    The ideal is something like a reverse wedge, if I remember correctly

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    you mean to tell me a large vehicle is less aerodynamic than a small animal that doesnt exist?

    fascinating.

    • @kurwa
      link
      53 months ago

      Well the shape exists, and I don’t think the size matters in aerodynamics? I’m not sure.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        the size doesnt matter for aerodynamics, generally, but it matters for physics.

        Drag is a square or cube scaling, i forget which, so at higher speeds it increases disproportionately.

        A larger object has more air to move out of the way, which means more drag. It’s more capable of moving that air with it’s increased volume. But then you also start running into volume to surface area scaling issues. Elephants are really slow for a reason, and it’s the same reason small animals are comparatively fast.