Summary

Elon Musk’s pro-Trump group, America PAC, selects $1 million giveaway winners based on their potential as spokespeople rather than randomly.

The Philadelphia district attorney Lawrence Krasner alleges this violates state consumer protection laws. “This was all political marketing masquerading as a lottery, albeit an illegal lottery,” Krasner said.

The U.S. Department of Justice has warned America PAC the giveaway could violate federal law, according to media reports, but federal prosecutors have not taken any public action.

The outcome of the lawsuit could impact the group’s ability to continue the contest, which has already awarded $16 million to registered voters in battleground states.

    • @Limonene
      link
      1082 months ago

      Well, it’s no longer an illegal lottery. So that’s good.

      It’s just a rigged lottery. Slightly different thing. Also illegal, but for slightly different reasons. More unethical and fraudulent than before.

      So it makes things better, and then makes things way worse.

      • @Tyfud
        link
        English
        292 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve got absolutely no clue why they thought this would be a better defense

  • @LEDZeppelin
    link
    English
    682 months ago

    So….if they’re not random, does that violate the definition of lottery in PA state?

  • @vegeta
    link
    442 months ago

    Grifting the rubes….grifting the rubes

  • @Whats_your_reasoning
    link
    262 months ago

    It’s interesting how this is only being reported now - the day before election day. When the early-voters already cast their ballots, and when the campaign no longer has to worry about keeping up the charade.

    How many people signed onto this thing only because they thought they could be the lucky winner? It’s not like they can take it back now. Musk got exactly what he wanted - tons of signatures of support from registered voters in swing states, that can now be trotted out as some kind of “proof” for his preferred candidate when he loses.

    On the one hand, some people do not know about, or even would believe, this news. Like die-hard MAGAts and/or people who don’t pay attention to current events.

    But for the people who signed the petition for the hell of it, hear about this now, and who are capable of accepting bad news? Oh, they will be pissed. I wouldn’t put it past such a person to respond, “Well, fuck you, too” by not voting tomorrow, or by specifically voting for Harris.

    I can’t expect the number of such people to be very high, but I do think that spite is a powerful force. Those who were on the fence before now have a personal reason to distrust Trump. And right in time to express it at the voting booth!

    • lemmyng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 months ago

      Except that they stated multiple times, publicly, that the winners are picked randomly. So if they are not running a lottery then they have defrauded the participants.

      • @just_another_person
        link
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They only did a few, and then found a way out. If you “reveal” some other reasoning behind the curtain, that is what is considered admissible, legally in the US.

        Example:

        DA: “You are accused of running a lottery to get people to vote for a specific candidate, which is illegal. Is that what happened?”

        Musk: “Nope, we lied about it being random, and the winners were specifically chosen, which is not a violation of the law”

        Proof: https://apnews.com/article/musk-million-sweepstakes-lottery-pennsylvania-krasner-4f683c48eb7dcc57f183e54ef16e7320

        • @neatchee
          link
          362 months ago

          Except it is a violation of the law, just a different law. They defrauded the public by collecting something of material value (registrant information) under false pretenses. It’s textbook fraud

          • @just_another_person
            link
            22 months ago

            I’m not his lawyer, but it certainly sounds like he didn’t consult with them before doing the thing, and this obviously shifty change in stance is because it’s his lawyers who found a way out of trouble for their client. I’m sure they have you beat on this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Like I said elsewhere fhis is exactly what they were claiming MR. Beast was doing, yet this guy admits it and it’s fine?

  • @ATDA
    link
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So the end game is to award nobodies, he thinks are going to be good potential spokespeople, to get out the message?

    Hi I’m some random loser that was gifted a million dollars, listen to me AstroTurf!

    Stellar

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Imagine submitting your name to be in a lottery, that isn’t a lottery and actually results in a background check on you to see if you’re who they’re looking for.

      Insane.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    Why not just…hire spokespeople for a PAC at $500k/yr based on a public contest/audition about making right wing content? Same outcome, not at all illegal.

  • @Dkarma
    link
    -12 months ago

    My wife knows a winner. They’re def random lol.

    Someone gonna go to jail over this.