In his speech declaring victory in the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 6, Donald Trump made no mention of Ukraine yet alluded to just how consequential his second term in office will likely be for the country ravaged by Russia’s invasion.

. . .

How does Trump plan to stop Russia’s war against Ukraine?

That’s the million-dollar question that is undoubtedly being discussed in capitals worldwide, not least in Kyiv and Moscow.

MBFC
Archive

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    11
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m sure he has a peace plan.

    The plan is for Putin to take a big peace of Europe and call it Russian territory.

    • @scaredoftrumpwinning
      link
      English
      52 hours ago

      Was about to say ask the Russians what they need and give it to them.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      English
      185 hours ago

      There are concepts of a plan

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 hours ago

        Damn, that already feels like a million years ago. You didn’t have to be a news junkie like me to see that quote and know that Trump lost the only debate the coward showed up to. Literally unfit to lead. Yet people just said “don’t care, want boot!” and voted him in anyway. So embarrassed for my stupid country…

      • Skiluros
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 hours ago

        Signing off on russians demands in not a plan.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    76
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    He doesn’t. He’s going to pull back and let Russia do their genocide thing. It’s why he blocked Ukraine aid before this started, too.

    Same for Gaza, and probably Taiwan as well.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      On the other hand, I could see him throwing a massive fit about Taiwan because “Chi-nah” and starting a war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      “Sure, I knew that voting for Trump meant more and worse genocides including on American soil, but I expected it from him. Seeing a genocide under Kamala Harris’s tenure as not-president made me worry she wouldn’t actually help once she became president. And then I’d be disappointed. Why would I want to possibly be disappointed when I can instead experience horrors that meet expectations?”

      - Probably a couple million people who shot their foot with their own cut-off nose as ammunition

    • @Valmond
      link
      English
      64 hours ago

      Where are all the gEnOcIdErS now?

      Oh, they were just shills…

      • @vzq
        link
        English
        217 hours ago

        No. But other people’s suffering has never mattered to him.

        • @wurzelgummidge
          link
          English
          -56 hours ago

          Never mattered to the Democrats either. No matter who has been in power America’s geopolitical ambitions are all that mattered. To Trump, he is the only thing that matters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 hours ago

            Trump’s vision is so myopic that he can’t see beyond his own nose. Same for is ability to care. If the US reneges on promises made as detailed in the Budapest Memorandum what chance will they have in other such promises. Countries are watching. This is doubly ironic as Trump keeps talking about nuclear war.

          • Skiluros
            link
            fedilink
            English
            116 hours ago

            While this is true, with the US, their geopolitical ambitions have sometimes aligned with positive developments (Germany, Japan, the Baltic nations and Poland in relatively more recent times). The same cannot be said for say Russia or China.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              -105 hours ago

              The same cannot be said for say Russia or China.

              How so? Russia doesn’t really have global ambitions anymore, but China is invested in seeing a larger global middle class and a weaker Western neocolonial hold over Africa. This can and has lead to positive developments.

                • @wurzelgummidge
                  link
                  English
                  -53 hours ago

                  China’s engagment in Africa is just as neocolonial as Western engagement if not more

                  How so?

                  China is building infrastructure, creating jobs and giving African nations the tools they need to develop thus creating wealth. What does China get out of it? Markets - a place to sell the products the make. That is quite a bit different from the western policy of enriching despots, plundering mineral wealth and leaving the countries to fester and rot.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -34 hours ago

                  Huh? Okay you’ll need to provide some evidence if you’re saying it’s anything as neocolonial as what France is doing to these countries.

          • @vzq
            link
            English
            26 hours ago

            That’s very cynical but not entirely wrong.

      • Skiluros
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 hours ago

        We will almost certainly see more bad news in context of global democracy and rise authoritarianism/plutocracy. Unfortunately, it seems that the US is entering a permanent oligarch-fueled “bread and circuses” phase (Big Macs and iPhones for the modern equivalent?).

  • rigatti
    link
    English
    277 hours ago

    He plans on ending it by ending Ukraine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 hours ago

      I don’t even think it’s that deep. Same thing happened in 2016. “I know how to end the war in the middle east, i know more than the secret service.”

      And americans shake their fat fists, “yeah, i know more than the secret service too, and i know how to end the middle east conflict. We have so much in common”

      • @fluxion
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        It’s definitely at least that deep. Russia didn’t go into overdrive trying to elect him because they think he’s going to be tougher on them than Biden.