• Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    Well… duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn’t that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you’re going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They’re both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.

    • @Cypher
      link
      English
      33 months ago

      I think it would be hydrodynamic and screw evolution I want my beef to be as aerodynamic as an F1.

    • @angrystego
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So is a cow more aerodynamic than a Jeep? Edit: Nevermind, it got kind of answered in another thread.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Even though you already got your answer, yes. Yes they are lmao. All I was trying to say, however, was that it’s not exactly fair to compare “creatures” that exist in two different mediums.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    273 months ago

    I’m gonna need to put oversized tires, a jack, and a custom air intake on it for all my trips to Walmart.

  • @_lilith
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Thats because its… HYDRODYNAMICALLY DESIGNED

    • @toynbee
      link
      English
      23 months ago

      Then why do they have those mufflers that stick above the car?

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Hey now - I ain’t judging nobody.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?

  • Annoyed_🦀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    Cyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it’s not aero.

  • @jqubed
    link
    English
    13 months ago

    That looks like a TJ generation. I’ve also seen these with the JK (usually compared with a cow). I’d be curious to see the JL/JT, though, because they did a very clever job of rounding it off while making it look like it’s still flat.