• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Wonder where chatgpt will get its training data in the future, as it’s known not to extrapolate well. Where will it learn new frameworks, languages, … from?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I doubt it ever scraped SO, otherwise all the answers would be smth along the lines: “I cannot answer this question due to low quality effort!” closes browser window

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            Somebody already did that but it wasn’t with chat GPT and honestly the docs were fine.

            It didn’t do that thing that a lot of humans do when writing documentation which is just declare that something is true without explaining why it is true. So you end up in random PHP like land, when things just work like that okay.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 days ago

            Honestly it’s petty good about doing that. Already had similar tooling options but it does a generally good job of making docs for non devs assuming good naming are used in the methods

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 days ago

          Yeah the smaller the project the less effective this is.

          But even learning from the source code is pretty effective.

      • Sentient Loom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        That works when the docs are good and clear. Otherwise, we’ll have to revert to communicating with each other for brief periods while the chat-bots train themselves on the new data.

  • Rikudou_Sage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6311 days ago

    I’ve been on SO like ten times altogether since ChatGPT came out. It’s so much nicer than the condescending pricks of Stack Overflow. My favourite is when some genius links a question as a duplicate of something that’s vaguely similar.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      2811 days ago

      The problem is that fewer people are generating the new content for gpt to slurp up.

      Free information stops working when people stop caring about creating it.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve thought about that as well. Doesn’t mean I’m gonna miss Stack Overflow specifically. Perhaps something better replaces it when AI gets poisoned by its own output too much.

          • Rikudou_Sage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 days ago

            Sure, that’s why a good service doesn’t create an environment which supports people being dicks. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what SO does with the way it works.

      • @jas0n
        link
        English
        210 days ago

        Yup. Stopped answering questions as soon as they did that.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 days ago

      This question was already answered 10 years ago in a completely different version of the programming language to the one you’re using, and we know it doesn’t work anymore, in fact hasn’t for 8 years, but we’re going to close it anyway because screw you.

      Also you should be doing it in Rust anyway

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 days ago

      What do you ask ChatGPT? I rarely get a correct answer really, it’s all made-up bullshit usually.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        I usually have good answers with only minimal bullshit when it comes to coding. If not, it at least points me in the right direction.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5511 days ago

    Down voted. If you’re just going to post a screenshot, you must include a link to the source. This is a link sharing platform.

    • @recapitated
      link
      English
      410 days ago

      Now that’s just a signal for training reinforcement

  • @Defaced
    link
    English
    5110 days ago

    The irony of it all is SO making deals for AI to scrape their site for machine learning but in doing so more people are using chatgpt and copilot more because it’s easier and just as accurate. AI/ML is really going to destroy these websites and yet it’s the websites signing off on their own death sentences.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4710 days ago

      It’s called selling out. I doubt they have any illusions about the future of these platforms, they just don’t care as long as they can cash out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2410 days ago

      What I’m still not sure of is this… When these websites die will the LLMs stagnate with no new data to use for training or will they somehow keep up with new technology and eliminate the need for certain basic questions that would originally have required human input?

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1510 days ago

        The ideal result? LLMs are just early versions of much better things that come later.

        The unlikely result: we develop a separate human curated internet somewhere, complete with verification that a human wrote every bit. Basically verifiable digital id and signing on everything. Maybe.

        The probable result: the internet turns to shit as AIs are trained on content created by AIs.

    • The Giant Korean
      link
      English
      1310 days ago

      I think they see the writing on the wall and they’re trying to make a buck while they still can.

  • @amzd
    link
    English
    3411 days ago

    It’s also around the time they did away with their jobs board thing isn’t it? I got a job through it in 2021 and somewhere after that they sunset it, which was an insane business decision because it was the best job search platform out there.

    • r00ty
      link
      fedilink
      2711 days ago

      I think it goes further than that. There’s two things happening with regard to AI and software development.

      1: Stack overflow has become less common as a resource to solve problems. This, as you say has a problem of input into LLMs for future problems to solve.
      2: Junior developers are being hired less because of AI. I assume the idea is that seniors will use AI in the same way they would usually use juniors. Except, they’ve done what business always does. Not think one bit about the future. Today’s senior developers are yesterdays junior developers.

      The combination of AI performance drop due to point 1, and the lack of new developers because of point 2 makes for potentially, a bad future for the profession.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3211 days ago

        As a senior developer I have no idea how I’d get an AI to autonomously keep a small subsystem maintained. If I was replacing junior developers, that’s what it has to do.

        Everybody in my team gets to own something. What you own depends on your capability. You learn by doing. No dogsbodies doing busy work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1511 days ago

          Everybody in my team gets to own something. What you own depends on your capability.

          This is a point I try to constantly make when people don’t understand why 2 people have the same title but don’t really have the same job, especially in technical fields.

          No two people have the same set of skills, so we all end up taking on the tasks we’re more capable of than the next person.

        • r00ty
          link
          fedilink
          611 days ago

          I don’t think developers are doing it. It’s managers making this kind of decision I’d say.

          • Mbourgon everywhere
            link
            English
            811 days ago

            It works great if nobody ever leaves or dies or takes vacation. We try to discourage siloization of projects and emphasize cross-training - it makes the job more interesting, gives people more/better tools to solve problems with, etc. And anytime the business objects we mention the project where X left and how painful it is to get new anything added/enhanced because none of those tenets were involved.

            However, all bets are off with offshore contractors. Some want to learn, some simply don’t care and will do the bare minimum.

            • Sentient Loom
              link
              fedilink
              English
              711 days ago

              We try to discourage siloization of projects and emphasize cross-training

              This is how my work has been and it allowed me to touch every part of the repo while still a junior dev and gain lots of experience. So I also like that. But lately I’m trying to specialize more and go deep into things, and I like the idea of being an expert on something. So I appreciate the trade-offs.

              all bets are off with offshore contractors. Some want to learn, some simply don’t care and will do the bare minimum.

              As a guy who was replaced by offshore contractors, and who hasn’t had a single interview in 7 months while offshore contractors are (probably) still getting lots of work… I find this observation both heartening and disheartening.

              • Mbourgon everywhere
                link
                English
                310 days ago

                One of my bosses has a concept of “T-shaped developers”, which means you know everything a little, and have depth on one thing.

                7months: ouch, sorry to hear. I wish I had some words of wisdom to share.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        Junior developers are being hired less because of AI.

        Where are you seeing this? I’ve not seen any evidence of that, yet.

        • r00ty
          link
          fedilink
          511 days ago

          I’ve been told about companies in the same field as mine with a hiring freeze on juniors. So it’s kinda second hand.

          • @privacyplslemmyB
            link
            English
            310 days ago

            Im a consultant senior dev and devops engineer. Ive worked for over 100 companies in the last 10 years on various engagements. Ive worked for multiple companies and clients at the same time through some consulting agencies. Ive worked for startups and FAANG companys. Ive also worked as a technical PM and EM for these same companies and hired hundreds of engineers.

            Junior dev market is 100% in its last death throws before finally officially being pronounced dead. The job market has vanished so thoroughly between AI and offshoring in a high fed-rate economy, even though we just started rate cutting, by the time we feel the effects, AI will have further killed juniors without ever returning.

            I dislike it, because i want to train people not machines, but the average junior dev is so bad its insane and not only have companies found that out, senior engineers have too. Many people like to TALK about mentoring new engineers… the reality is, few actually do. It takes significantly less time to correct chatgpt and claude code then it does to have a junior take 2-5 days and write it all wrong, and they interrupt your work to ask you a million questions again and again.

            I just had a contract with a startup company… 40 million series B company with a simple fucking CRUD app… their engineering team? 35 SENIOR ONLY engineers. The least senior of which was an IC3 our of IC6 senior engineer.

            • r00ty
              link
              fedilink
              110 days ago

              This does tally up with what I’ve been hearing. Where I’m at there’s been a few hires straight into senior. I’ve not heard of an official junior freeze. At the same time it’s been a long time since I’ve seen a new one.

              The problem, as I commented prior, is that if we no longer bring in junior devs to gain this kind of experience, we lose the flow of junior -> senior. But in most places, the people making the decisions won’t consider anything beyond the end of the current fin year.

    • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I think the quality contributors are probably not the ones moving to chatGPT…

    • @asap
      link
      English
      1411 days ago

      That wouldn’t stop page views from being counted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1911 days ago

    Chat GPT is wonderful as a search engine for SO. It regurgitates the answers in a format easier to incorporate into your own project.

    The thing I’m worried about is a lack of new answers. You need data to train an LLM, what to do if nobody is producing it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 days ago

        I typically visit stack overflow when encountering edge cases and bugs not covered by the documentation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 days ago

          If it has learned from the source code you’d be surprised how good it is at that as well.

          For docs it’s better, for other stuff it’s way worse than a human.

          It’s a shame so much stuff is locked up in discord these days.

          • Eager Eagle
            link
            English
            310 days ago

            yeah, discord the the true black hole of information

      • @Evotech
        link
        English
        511 days ago

        But who writes the docs now

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Ha! I have an AI for that! Gotcha!

          On, but the AI trains now on other docs that I used an AI to write…

          Oh shit…

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    English
    1411 days ago

    But can ChatGPT downvote answers into oblivion?

  • Kokesh
    link
    English
    1011 days ago

    I’m raising their traffic,by slowly poisoning my answers & questions.

      • Kokesh
        link
        English
        411 days ago

        I didn’t consent to ChatGPT using my stuff. So they get 💩.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 days ago

          Wut. You consented to CC BY-SA. That’s consenting to everyone using your work, including for profit companies and nonprofits. This is a good thing.

          • Kokesh
            link
            English
            310 days ago

            I’ve tried to delete my content, I wasn’t allowed. So I replaced all my content with text about not consenting to this whole thing. I got banned for 2 months “to think about my behavior”, or something like that. So I’ve set a reminder for the date…

  • @BlackPenguins
    link
    English
    811 days ago

    Interesting. I actually thought of it as a replacement for Google. With Google search being broken for years it’s the only easy way to get information now.