• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    One important missing piece is having information on the maximum desired size of a window. This is the size beyond which the window content stops looking good. Not having this information is one of the reasons that traditional tiling window managers have issues, especially on larger screens.

    I have been upset over losing this functionality from the classic Macintosh days for decades now. This was built into the Macintosh OS going back to at least System 7. Clicking the “expand” button in the title bar would expand (or shrink) a window to its optimum size. For Finder windows, that meant the smallest size that could display all the files without scrolling (if possible).

    Developers had to implement logic to make it work. For the most part, they did, and it worked very well up through OS 9.

    Then came OS X. The green button, at first, worked exactly the same way it did in OS 9. The problem was that even Apple didn’t give a damn to write any logic for it into their apps. It might as well have been a “randomize” button. Users got frustrated. Windows converts wondered why there was no “maximize” button and blamed the very concept of expanding rather than Apple’s now-piss-poor implementation. Longtime Mac users wondered why we effectively lost a very useful feature.

    Over the years, Apple continued to neglect the function of the green button, and third-party devs largely followed suit. Eventually Apple changed the default behavior of the green button to go into full-screen mode, hiding the original (still mostly broken) “zoom” functionality behind an Option-click. At this point, the the difference is effectively “full screen” vs “windowed full screen”. RIP the classic Mac OS expand function.

    • @asparagapple
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Although the functionality is still abysmal, you can also double click the title/header bar to zoom.

      • SALT
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        What is zoom in Mac. I never have mac, I’m curious 😂

        • @asparagapple
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Similar to maximize but it tries to expand the window only enough to show all the content without needing to scroll.

  • Shertson
    link
    English
    171 year ago

    A good start would be to implement quarter tiling by dragging window to screen corner, like half tiling is done by dragging to screen edge.

    I have a 3840x2160 monitor specifically so that I can have four windows open at the best size for their content (email, document, web browse, and terminal) and can avoid the use of workspaces and see everything at once. Having to manually resize and place windows is a pain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Quarter tiling is huge on a 4K screen. I use a 4K screen when I’m doing YouTube programming videos sometimes and want to have OBS, a camera preview, an HDMI capture preview, and sometimes an app I want to put on screen open at the same time and quarter tiling is great for this. I currently have to use an extension to get this functionality on GNOME, but it would be awesome to have it built in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Seems like quarter tiling is a nice start, with additional splitting when dragging a window over another as shown in the OP.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Have you tried the Pop Shell gnome extension? It allows you to toggle i3wm like window tiling. It’s also similar to Rectangle on macOS

      • Shertson
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I have tried it. It resizes windows weirdly. I haven’t dug through the settings for it, so it could be fixable. No matter how I resize my terminal, it always snaps to smaller than a quarter of the screen. Thunderbird seems to always resize bigger than a quarter of the screen. It’s still better than nothing, but I’d love for it to be built in.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I’ve been using paperwm on gnome for a couple years now, it’s my preferred paradigm for tiling. This looks like it has a lot of the same influences, so I’m interested in seeing where it goes

    • Shertson
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I haven’t seen this paperwm. I’ll have to check it out.

    • @petunia
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      PaperWM really should be its own DE. It’s so good, almost perfect, but held back by its nature of merely being a GNOME extension.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You’re not wrong about that at all. I thought about making a Wayland WM TM around that idea, but programming is work and not fun now so ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • Nemo
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    Looks really interesting, hopefully this can be a step forward for window management as a whole

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Moving maximized windows to their own workspace seems like a really cool idea. Workspace management is one of the things I struggle with so I usually just end up with way too many tiled windows on a single screen when they could be moved around more efficiently.

    • Virkkunen
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      That’s pretty much how MacOS does, but I wouldn’t call Mac’s window management good by any means.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yeah, I am regularly confused by it. I prefer having my maximized windows as normal windows in a virtual desktop. I can then minimize them and work with the windows below as usual. The MacOS approach is very different in that regard. I prefer managing virtual desktops myself, as it allows me to organize stuff and allows me to keep a simple overview of my virtual working layout in the back of my head. Dynamically changing the amount of virtual desktops/maximized windows is just too counterintuitive for my taste.

  • @warmaster
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Looks awesome, I can’t wait.

  • @lynny
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Are they going to rethink putting thumbnails in the file selection dialog or many of their other insane decisions?

    Gnome seems like they want to take the Apple approach to UI design without the attention to detail that Apple’s UX has.

    • Virkkunen
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I always disliked Gnome because of this and also because it seems like the developers want to force their tastes and use cases to everyone else. You either learn to work their way, or move out. That’s one of the many things I like about KDE, despite the devs having their preferred default way of doing things, they leave options for the users to decide in an easy way (i.e. having everything in the settings menu, without needing to download and install a separate program or manually editing config files)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    This is looking really great, and I want it now. Wish I didn’t know about it until just before I could use it :P

  • @Bogasse
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    I love the direction this is going, I’ve been using i3/sway for years and gnome apps recently became awesome in tiling mode because of their responsiveness. If this is implemented this could definitely get me back on gnome 👍

    • Chewy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yes, I’ll definitely give tiling on Gnome a try again once this lands. Tiling mainly the reason I’m looking forward to System76’s new Cosmic DE.

  • rayon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    This looks cool. I might consider trying GNOME again if it gets implemented.

  • Gamma
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If this becomes a Wayland protocol, then I’d love to see other desktops adopt it as well.

    I could see a few classic TWMs use those hints, or at least expose them for users to script functionality.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    As long as the windows are being maximised into a workspace you can jump to with SUPER+[0-9], this seems interesting, if overly reliant on the mouse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Looks well thought out, I’m interested! I think the biggest problem will be leaving the user enough control to modify the layouts after they’ve launched and not downsize apps after the user has upsized them and the like. As long as that is overcome this would be a fantastic way to use the desktop.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    So I’ve used the Pop Shell extension. It’s really neat when you have a bunch of little windows like terminals and file browsers open. 95% of the time it’s actively annoying though. I appreciate that it’s on a toggle so I can use it when I want it. The proposed mosaic mode doesn’t seem terribly different, and has the same problem where it just randomly moves things around breaking my association of “where I put that”. Most of the time I really need the spatial aspect, and am willing to manage a few windows by hand to get it.

    Also: Joining half screen windows into a single unit?! Please don’t do it! D: Augh! Apple did that on OS X about the time I left and I absolutely hated it. It was so actively bad. :(

  • Ozymandias
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    That would be really awesome! Especially if it could learn your preferences automatically by how you change the default arrangement.