And why is the W silent anyways?

    • @gedaliyah
      link
      111 month ago

      Oh-neh

      Twah

      Three is fine

      Fah-oor

      Feevey

  • Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    48
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The ⟨W⟩ is silent now, but it wasn’t until 1500 or so. Back then the word was pronounced /two:/; it would almost rhyme with contemporary “toe”. But then that /o:/ became /u:/ (the modern pronunciation), due to the Great Vowel Shift, and since /w/ and /u/ are really similar they fused together.

    @[email protected] mentioned that in a few associated words that ⟨W⟩ letter still represents an actual /w/ phoneme, note how the following vowel is different - that blocked the “fusion”.

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      I thought it was the ‘w’ that had made the sound all along, perhaps modified by the ‘o’. The ‘o’ then became a schwa or an unnecessary similar sound and was then dropped as redundant. “hwo” followed the same development, but we spell that “who” these days.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        We know that the modern /u:/ is not from that old /w/ because other words followed the same change - even words without /w/, like “moon”, “poop” (yup) or “boot”. In fact it’s how the digraph ⟨oo⟩ became associated with the sound.

        The case of “hwo"→"who” is a bit more complicated. As you said the “wh” digraph used to be “hw”; the change happened in Early Modern times, and it was likely for readability - less sequential short strokes = easier to read. People around those times did other weird stuff like respelling “u” as “o”, as in the word “luue"→"loue” (modern “love”), for the same reason.

        However, later on that /hw/ sequence of phonemes started merging into a single sound, [ʍ]: like [w] you round your lips to pronounce it, but like [h] you don’t vibrate your vocal folds. And if that [ʍ] happened before a rounded vowel - like [o:] or similar - it was reanalysed as a plain /h/. So for words like “who”, it’s like the “w” was dropped, just like in “two”, but in a really roundabout way.

        And, before non-rounded vowels, that [ʍ] still survives in plenty dialects; for example, “when” as either [ʍɛn] or [wɛn]. This change is recent enough that you still have some speakers in NZ and USA who use [ʍ].

        • palordrolap
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I guess my confusion comes from the fact I’m from a place that only within the last 100 years or so has all but lost the original “hw” in “correct” speech, except in “who”, and I was thinking that the ‘w’ had to have been preserved, especially if the ‘h’ was.

          There’s also that the ‘w’ hasn’t vanished in “twenty” (or “twain”, etc.).

          • Lvxferre
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            No worries - plus the whole thing is damn counter-intuitive, both “sounds fusing together but still conveying two phonemes” and “that sound was analysed as one phoneme, now as another” are kind of weird.

  • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
    link
    451 month ago

    Curiously in words related to ‘two’ the W is often pronounced!

    Twin, Twixt, Between, Twelve etc

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 month ago

      Oh. My. God. I am so disappointed in myself that I never realized these words were all related before. Thank you for this gift.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        A few less-obvious associations, just for fun:

        • Just like “the house” /s/ is “to house” /z/, “the glass” /s/ is “to glaze” /z/
        • Tiw’s Day, Wotan’s Day, Thor’s Day, Frigg’s Day. Note: Tiw, Wotan and Frigg are the native names for Norse Tyr, Odin and Freyja.
        • “Flee”, “fly”, “flow” are all related.
        • The “mus” in “muscle” is a borrowed cognate to native “mouse”.
    • @cybervseas
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      By the argument, is the w in “two” actually silent? What would it sounds like when pronounced? I think it would sound like “two” already does.

      • @cannedtuna
        link
        251 month ago

        It would sound like “twu” as in “twu wuv”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 month ago

        It sounds exactly like “to” which means the w is silent.

        It is not pronounced at all like any of the other example words given.

      • @over_cloxOP
        link
        81 month ago

        I don’t necessarily think so. If the W was pronounced, I think it would sound something more like ‘tawoo’ or ‘teewoo’

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        I wonder if perhaps an older dialect used to pronounce the W. Lots of words have changed spelling or pronunciation over the years, so I’m curious if that might be the case with “two”, too.

        • Lvxferre
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I wonder if perhaps an older dialect used to pronounce the W.

          That’s correct, and it isn’t even that old - based on the [o:]→[u:] change it should be from 1500 or so. And the modern Scots cognate ⟨twa⟩ /twɑ:/~/twɔ:/ still has it.

    • @over_cloxOP
      link
      41 month ago

      Side question?

      Does twelve basically mean two eleven?

    • @Crackhappy
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      The last time I was with a woman it was actually twoo, it was quite magical, I tell ya.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wait until you learn about words starting with a silent p, like pterodactyl and ptoilet.

  • @Lost_My_Mind
    link
    51 month ago

    So, basically the owl from the tootsie roll commercials.

    One…ah-ToWHO…three!

    crunch

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 month ago

    It is sometimes done in German. The word is Zwei, but it’s somewhat common to say Zwo instead for clarity. The w is pronounced.

    I guess the" tw" sound isn’t used as frequently in English. It happens in between.

    • @over_cloxOP
      link
      -2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Okay, unless you want to taunt someone into trying to hijack your Google account or track your info, you should edit your comment link to remove the ? and everything after that.

    • @over_cloxOP
      link
      -21 month ago

      You do realize the ?si shit is your private YT token right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My dude, chill. It’s ‘just’ an analytics tracking id.

        I do usually remove them before sharing. But no, it’s absolutely useless for hijacking an account.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Interesting. Do you have any more info on the SourceID token and how it can compromise an account?

    • @over_cloxOP
      link
      11 month ago

      I probably didn’t title my post properly. My bad, seems most people got my point.