(archived link)

“I was hoping this would blow over but since the death threats have started I have decided to address it.”

  • TheTechnician27
    link
    English
    412 months ago

    confused supporters of U.S. president-elect Donald Trump

    Interesting tautology there.

  • @Seleni
    link
    English
    282 months ago

    Well, these Trump supporters are sure doing a good job of showing why the florist in TN needed to bar them from entry.

  • @Tehdastehdas
    link
    English
    142 months ago

    Shouldn’t take reviews from people who’ve never visited or ordered anything from a shop.

    • @Agent641
      link
      English
      272 months ago

      Software designer here. Quick question on the spec. How do you want us to validate that?

      • @qarbone
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        Unethically invasive data

        • @x00z
          link
          English
          62 months ago

          Public toilets with stool analyzers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Totally invasive idea here but just spitballing.

        Take a photo at the location, upload photo so that EXIF data can be used to geolocate you at the business you are reviewing. Photo doesnt have to be used in the review, just as a passkey to verify you were St least present at the place you were reviewing at least once.

        Cons: faking EXIF data let’s people review places they never went to, sharing a photo with a horde of review bombers so they can all upload it and still reviewbomb the place

        Fun thought experiment.

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          Good enough. What percentage of the population do you figure has even heard of EXIF, let alone how to spoof it? And of those, who would go to the trouble for a fake review?

          • @BigPotato
            link
            English
            52 months ago

            “Hey fellow believers, use this image for verification so we can review Jim’s Unrelated Entity we’re currently harassing! FB doesn’t want you to have this image so go to X!”

            and I never had to explain EXIF to my horde of undedicated monsters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Presently probably not a huge amount, but its an easy thing to disseminate once it’s figured out.

            You could keep a hash of a photos EXIF data so that the same photo can’t be used for two different reviews, to prevent spamming, but that’s a whole other set of questions and problems to build a solution for storing that.

            It’d be a fun problem to work on, but wouldn’t ever be 100% secure from exploitation. Might be a fun weekend project to get a proof of concept working.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Qr code in the location, you have to scan it to post a review. Your phone keeps track of the last years worth of lcation qr codes, and you have automatic permission to review anything youve already reviewed.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Trump-supporting hateful dumbasses, more like.

  • @SpiceDealer
    link
    English
    82 months ago

    In the days since the owner of Memphis-based Everbloom Design…

    Holy shit! She’s local. I’m going to pay a visit to support my local businesses.

  • Maple Engineer
    link
    English
    62 months ago

    As dumb as blocks of wood and not nearly as useful.

  • GladiusB
    link
    English
    32 months ago

    Of course they do. They have now become Scientology.