You must log in or register to comment.
I still have mine!
7MP … money bags over here
My first point-and-shoot camera was a 2MP Fujifilm that I paid about $300 for.
My first digital camera was a 1.3 MP generic no-name with a fixed-focus lens. But I was like 12 and my parents weren’t about to drop hundreds on me. Plus it was the year 2000, so anything over a megapixel was amazing.
My camera before that was a Game Boy Camera. It was so bad that you could only really take selfies with it. Anything else was unrecognizable 8-bit pixel-puke. Plus the cartridge held less than 30 pictures and the prints faded within a couple of years, making it impossible to preserve any shots you took with it.
Your friendly reminder that the Mars rover main cameras are only 2MP. They probably have better quality sensors though.
Point and shoot like this is still around, I own a modern Sony one. It fits in my pocket for travel and replaces my huge Canon DSLR and Sigma lens that I have in storage while I’m moving to another state.
The little camera is very practical and can zoom 100x more than my phone and has image stability that blows my mind at its 4k video at full zoom handheld shots.
I’ve got a ZV1, useful little gadget
Cybershot for the win!!
Back when even the crap cameras for normies had decent optics on them. Smart phones…try.
Smartphones still take better photos but they compensate for the optics with software. If you stick that large of a lens into a smartphone, the battery would be too small. Not ti mention the extra moving parts required for retractable lens.
The Nokia 1020 would like to have a word
I don’t have a problem with phones having simple optics. What I think I’d like to reject is the notion that the one device is your cell phone, media player, web browser, camera, flashlight, fleshlight flishlight, floshlight and flushlight, all in one quarter inch thick slab of mostly touch screen.
Let me go back to having a 4 inch smart phone that can do some of that stuff, like I didn’t mind my Galaxy S4 Mini’s camera, it worked fine. If I’m going to be serious about photography I want a device that is mostly a camera with a good sensor and decent optics. If I’m gonna have a flashlight I want it to fit in my hand and have a properly bright LED with decent optics, if I’m gonna have a fleshlight I want a proper aperture with interesting texturing on the inside and decent optics. My S10e is the worst floshlight I’ve ever had. I might as well use my foot.
Sometimes snatch these for $10 at the thrift.
- Usually take modern memory cards, at worst with an adapter
- Actual focus mechanism vs. fake digital zoom
- Small loss if you drop it in the swamp, get it soaked, otherwise ruin it
- Almost all employ high quality gears and lenses and such
- Generally take a pair of AAs. (Maybe stay off the units with proprietary batteries.)
- Resolution is plenty fine for most use cases. Your pic is getting down-scaled when you share it. We’re dressing up and taking 1-year anniversary wedding pics because all we have is shit that was downgraded by being passed around.
tl;dr: I’d buy the one pictured in a second.
At 7mp that’s pretty good.
My first one was 1.2 mp, 2 years later my phone had a 1mp. Fortunately I didn’t pay much for the camera.
Better and larger sensor, producing less noise, meaning less need for noise reduction post-processing that makes smartphone photographs horribly muddy. The first digital camera my family ever owned (2MP, 8x zoom, still functional 20 years later) takes better pictures than my new phone.
These are selling for hundreds of dollars not just because of nostalgia but also practicality. You’re not allowed to bring connected devices into secure facilities but you may need to document things with photographs.
I would also like to have a point-and-shoot camera where the sensor would be much larger than the ones of the majority of phones.
Seems too niche of a market, but would be nice
Ricoh GR III
Fuji X100V
Yes, I had those on my radar for a bit, but the 1000 bucks is probably a bit too much for me
There’s the Fuji mentioned in the other comment, which is pretty much exactly what you describe. But also depending on your budget, there’s a whole market of crop-sensor/APS-C cameras in more or less that form factor with a lot more flexibility. Then of course there’s the Leica stuff, but that’s more money than problems territory.
There’s an Australian company basically reconditioning old canon powershots with new batteries and memory card connections: https://lola.camera/
deleted by creator
Point and shoot.
Good ol SX-70 film. Definitely recommend the SLR SX-70s though, way more fun to use and easier to store.
I’ve lately been seeing a lot of gen alpha using old school digital cameras. I don’t know if it’s a retro fad or what.
Aha! So it is a kind of retro thing.
Been there done that
Idk it’s a fun toy for when you’re in the woods or wherever with someone
It’s like we’re making a foto instead of using the phones
I still have one of these. They had an issue where the lense would get stuck and the solution was to drop the camera on the carpet from around 3 feet up. That dislodged it and it started zooming again.
Got some strong Apple vibes with that solution.
I still use one, when I need to take a picture of my phone, for reasons! A few other things, too, but not much.
I had this one.
my wife’s sister gave her her old digital photography camera from around 2005ish. she was really excited but that was tempered by the realization that her iphone takes nicer pictures. crazy how far digital camera tech has come in so few years!
I somehow ended up with a fujifilm that had a slot that took an SD card but would scratch it up and corrupt it within a few times using it, or you could use an xd card instead. What’s an xd card I hear you ask? Oh, only tech that existed for approximately 5 years and died the same year I bought the camera.
I’ve made stupider tech purchases but I’m having trouble recalling one at the moment. Perhaps the iphone 3gs was nearly as bad.
The Canon point and shoots used to take really beautiful pictures.
I dug out my old one, probably five or six years ago, to compare to whatever phone I had in my pocket. I remembered the excellent pictures and figured the lenses might make a difference.
It was obnoxious how much better my phone was. I don’t really get why, but it was night and day.
I have an Olympus Tough, which I bought because it’s waterproof and I can take it out on the water without worrying. What I use it for a lot though is its macro settings, amazing levels of magnification. And both: took some great close-ups of tadpoles in a pond.
