• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    In what world is die hard 3 worse than die hard 2. It’s arguably tied with die hard 1 as the best one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 hours ago

    Matrix is great all the way through. The problem is that a lot of people didn’t understand the story. There’s a good explainer on YouTube by Looper.

    • @gerbler
      link
      English
      34 hours ago

      Eh, the subtext in 2 and 3 is neat but the first movie is by far the best. It sets up a premise and concludes it beautifully and doesn’t get too big for its britches. I still enjoy some of the over the top moments from 2 and 3 but there’s definitely a leap and I’m not sure the pay off is as good as the first film.

    • Billegh
      link
      English
      66 hours ago

      Sure, but it is also the medium’s responsibility to help the audience understand.

      • @IzzyScissor
        link
        English
        35 hours ago

        That’s true, but I’d argue that the more personal that any art is, the fewer people who will instantly understand their meaning.

        Think about it like this, if you were watching a movie in a language you don’t speak (without subtitles), you could still enjoy a lot of it, but might not be able to fully follow the story. But, the story is still there if you know how to hear it. Sometimes you just need someone else to help translate.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      I agree they’re better than this says, but the first is also the best, by a moderate margin. The other two get a lot of shit that isn’t deserved.

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 hours ago

    Terminator is a strange one. Cooked with the first movie, second one is somehow even better and then the third one is absolute ass.

  • Lorindól
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 hours ago

    I am fully aware I’m pretty much alone with my opinion, but I find Terminator 1 far superior to T2.

    Even with the limited budget T1 manages to create a far more horrifying vision of an unstoppable killer coming after you. The lo-fi’ish synth soundtrack sets a perfect oppressive feeling. The casting is perfect, Michael Biehn’ s scarred and wiry Reese with Hamilton’s young and scared next door girl going against metal-Arnold in his prime is the epitome of underdog scenarios.

    And the pacing is very good, the plot flows.

    T2 is a good film, but like many sequels, it suffers from the “let’s do the same thing from a different angle, but bigger and louder!” - syndrome. It doesn’t really get to be it’s own kind of beast. I was very surprised that Cameron fell for the trap, after he avoided that mistake with “Aliens”. Switching genre from space horror to space action made that film stand firmly on it’s own feet and the result was good.

    Lastly, T2 has the young John Connor doing the “badass kid” - role, which so many seem to love. I just find the character annoying.

    • @BeMoreCareful
      link
      English
      38 hours ago

      I think T2 hits everybody that was a certain age when it came out a bit different. Young John Connor appealed to the divorced-parents-latch-key-kid generation.

      Though hard agree the first one was pretty solid. Definitely more of a horror vibe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 hours ago

    I know it doesn’t fit the trilogy thing, but you left out the best Rocky movie: Rocky IV.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    1811 hours ago

    I disagree with the Indiana Jones ratings. The third movie was better than the second, and possibly better than the first too.

      • db0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The second was so much more sexist and racist than I remembered that I gave up

    • @Allonzee
      link
      English
      68 hours ago

      They made viewers work to understand. Viewers largely rejected that.

      Which has led us, irrevocably, to spoon fed trash that plays to the dumbest person in the audience.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 hours ago

        I enjoyed all three movies, but there was a lot that I didn’t get until I watched an explainer on YouTube.

    • @nieminen
      link
      English
      711 hours ago

      Don’t understand why people dislike those movies so much. Even enjoyed the 4th one.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        They didn’t deliver on the promises that Neo made at the end of the first movie. They’re quite different than the first film. The 4th one was an obvious cash grab by the studios. The Wachowskis didn’t want to make the movie, and they straight-up tell the audience in the movie that they were forced to do it, or let someone else do it.

        • @BeMoreCareful
          link
          English
          78 hours ago

          The fourth was sort of hilarious on that point. HERE’S YOUR STUPID MOVIE! I’d have been pissed if I was expecting something different, but I laughed my ass off.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            English
            47 hours ago

            I wasn’t expecting much of anything with the movie. I only watched it because it was free, and I was curious. The messaging about cash grabs, licensing, and lack of style were my favorite parts of the movie. It’s just a shame that it exists and somewhat tarnishes the rest of the movies.

            • @BeMoreCareful
              link
              English
              36 hours ago

              Yeah, but you did get to see an angry director have some corporate movie executives write her a check to tell them to fuck themselves in a pretty definitive manner.

              That made me kind of happy, it was a relentless torrent of hate, but it seemed like it was aimed in the right direction.

              • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Yes, I respected them a lot more after watching the movie than I did when it was announced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 hours ago

        well, on that one, i personally flat out noped out when they had that rotund dude thirst over trinity

  • @grue
    link
    English
    89 hours ago

    Back to the Future is, as a whole, the best trilogy on this list.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Nope, including the LotR movies. I will die on this hill.

        Specifically, Robert Zemeckis > Peter Jackson. the BttF trilogy was masterfully executed with great plot, pacing, and incredible attention to detail (down to things like e.g. “Twin Pines Mall” becoming “Lone Pine Mall” because Marty ran over one of Old Man Peabody’s pines). Meanwhile, Peter Jackson couldn’t even figure out how to get major plot points like the Scouring of the Shire to work, let alone Tom Bombadil.

        • rustydomino
          link
          English
          14 hours ago

          My brother in Manwe, you kind of lost some credibility calling Tom Bombadil a major plot point.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            18 minutes ago

            No, you misunderstood. “Not even X, let alone Y” is just as much about differences in magnitude as it is similarities in kind:

            Meanwhile, Peter Jackson couldn’t even figure out how to get major plot points like the Scouring of the Shire to work, let alone [minor ones like] Tom Bombadil.

  • @ChicoSuave
    link
    English
    4714 hours ago

    Indiana Jones 3 is as good, if not better, than any other movie in the series.

  • @deus
    link
    English
    711 hours ago

    I can’t wait for Dune 3. If Villeneuve sticks the landing his trilogy will become for Sci-fi what LotR is for fantasy.