• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    469 hours ago

    Every time there’s a recall, I remember the equation from Fight Club and how the company has to make a decision to recall or absorb the costs. Tesla has had A LOT of recalls mostly with the cyber truck. Musk doesn’t seem like the kind of person to be cautious and recall to be on the safe side.

    So… What AREN’T they recalling?

    • @meco03211
      link
      English
      23 hours ago

      For this kind of recall, the expense can be insanely low. It’s just a software update that can be done over the air. Something that would warrant a recall is the type of thing they would fix for future builds. So they already put money into it to update the software for future builds. Just pushing it to older builds is simple. Ergo the part of the formula for “the cost of doing the recall” is, as previously mentioned, insanely low. This makes it very easy to have that cost be lower than the amount to settle out of court.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Tesla may have figured out how SpaceX deals with the muskrat. They basically have a team of people that run interference with tons of busywork they shove in his face when he visits, so that he can’t actually do anything.

      If Trump’s people have half a brain, they will talk to the people that give the British rich and powerful the run around.

      • paraphrand
        link
        English
        78 hours ago

        How is it possible for the Muskrat to not be aware of all this, if we in the public are?

        • @Zron
          link
          English
          56 hours ago

          You think a billionaire that spends most of his “very busy” schedule tweeting nonsense cares to read the news?

          There’s probably a dedicated intern that gives him daily briefings while Musk scrolls twitter for a new Nazi to retweet. The intern knows better than to upset the Muskrat, and keeps news about Tesla issues to a minimum.

          • @unphazed
            link
            English
            24 hours ago

            Tweets and Diablo IV

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    the automaker said it’s providing a free software update to fix the problem.

    I know it has to be called a recall, but they really should find another name for these things now that OTA SW updates for issues are a thing, not only for Tesla but also other manufacturers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6510 hours ago

      Nah I like the term recall. Just because the fix is “easy” doesn’t mean the product wasn’t broken. Automakers should take the software in their cars seriously especially the ones that market their cars like a cell phone.

      • @ForgotAboutDre
        link
        English
        189 hours ago

        Broken software shouldn’t be accepted as much as it is. Especially in safety critical systems like cars, especially when they remove manual controls for things like steering, brakes, hand brakes and door handles. Fly/drive by wire is more dangerous when the software is unreliable. Mechanical linkages fail immediately or take a long time. Bad software fails in uncertain and potentially chaotic ways.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I just think it’s useful to have different words for things that can be easily fixed without having to go get the car to a mechanic and having no immediate safety impact, and things that may require you to take the vehicle to a mechanic ASAP because there is immediate serious danger. They should not be in the same category, and people should be aware that they require different levels of attention and urgency. When it’s all just referred to as a “recall”, people will start to not take them seriously when they more often than not are minor things like this.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          610 hours ago

          I think a “recall” has a very specific legal definition, where the manufacturer has strictly defined responsibilities (identifying and notifying owners of affected vehicles would be one of those). It wouldn’t surprise me if there was some external agency that acted as an auditor on that.

          On the other hand, manufacturers can put out a “service action” bulletin, where a particular repair is free to the vehicle owner, but none of those recall responsibilities are in place. This means that, for example, vehicle owners are not notified, so you just need to bring your vehicle in with the complaint specified in the service action. In this case, the vehicle owner might need to point out that there’s a service action, because a shady dealer will pretend it doesn’t exist, charge you for the repair, and also submit the repair to the manufacturer for reimbursement. This was a lot easier to do before the internet, since the information about that service action wasn’t readily available to the public.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 hours ago

            Tesla owners are not notified as such when the recalls are fixed by SW updates, they just get an update pushed to the car and a request in the car that there is an update ready to install.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              310 hours ago

              Maybe that counts as the notification? I’ve never owned a car that does OTA shit. All the recalls that have applied to any of my cars have been mailed to me directly, sometimes even well before they are even able to be repaired, waiting on parts availability.

          • @WhatAmLemmy
            link
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            A recall implies the product is irreparably damaged, or too expensive to repair, and needs to be returned/replaced.

            This framing benefits corporations, because the average recall is relatively minimal and inconsequential, the public will grow to consider “recalls” as normal instead of “potentially deadly failure/defect”, and make it easier for corporate sociopaths like Space Karen to scream gubberment overreach. The wording should reflect the risk to life/public health (e.g. potential to cause harm/death) as well as the cost to repair/replace (quantify the severity of the failure/defect).

            The greater the access and granularity consumers have to this type of data, the greater the benefit to society. Any corporation, politician or lobby group arguing otherwise is your enemy.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              49 hours ago

              A recall implies the product is irreparably damaged, or too expensive to repair, and needs to be returned/replaced.

              No, it does not. I can’t think of an automotive recall that wasn’t repaired and resulted in a buyback. I’m sure there was one or two, I just can’t think of them. Edit: Here’s the list. And most of those have to do with bad welds or badly adhering paint (which affects windshields in collisions).

              Lots of cars from all manufacturers end up with recalls that get fixed as a matter of course.

        • @kameecoding
          link
          English
          49 hours ago

          It’s not useful at all, knowing which brand sells shitty cars that have major issues is a good thing, this whole attitude that you can do OTA fix something therefore it’s fine and we can ship bad product is fucking ridiculous attitude to a multi-ton weapon capable of killing multiple people

          • @ForgotAboutDre
            link
            English
            29 hours ago

            It’s worse than that, people will argue shipping good code is impossible. Good testing is hard, so it’s avoided for things like unit tests. Something that’s only equivalent to basic QA in manufacturing. Every software functions is a design change and the system needs to be fully validated and tested. That’s means driving the car, and not shipping the code and using the users cars to prove your design.

        • @Soup
          link
          English
          18 hours ago

          The problem is, and of course when it matters I forget the specifics, that there are many times when language is changed to soften how bad something is and it results in people not taking things seriously.

          The issue here is cars being shipped in a broken state, that’s it. They recall the vehicles and force people to skip out of work or whatever to get this shit done because their products suck, and if they wanted to not deal with that then maybe they should products that don’t suck. They can also collect a bunch of these issues, seeing as they’re common, and either make a patch of several minor issues or just say that the problem will be addressed at the next service. This is entirely on the companies to save their image, not us to change our language to make them feel better.

    • @mrnarwall
      link
      English
      68 hours ago

      As a software engineer, I would think to call this a patch or a hotfix. I agree that recall for this type of situation is a bit too dramatic, but I’d also say that patch or hotfix are too casual sounding

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 hours ago

      Yes absolutely. The term recall is supposed to be when they literally recall the cars, like bring them back in, in the same context as you recall your dog after he runs around the yard.
      No cars are being brought back in. No dealers are involved here. It’s just a bug fix for the next software release.

      I also don’t like how the ability to fix bugs is creating a huge number of ‘recalls’. For example, last year Tesla had a ‘recall’ because NHTSA decided the warning icons on the dashboard screen weren’t big enough. Like the icons for parking brake and seat belt. Which is frustrating because the car is operated for years with the original icons and nobody had a complaint.

      But if this was an old style car, where those were individual LEDs silkscreened in an instrument cluster, that would never be a recall because it would cost millions to replace every single instrument cluster on every single car. But because it is remotely fixable, it becomes a recall.

      • @Serinus
        link
        English
        25 hours ago

        Guys, rail against the things that are true. There are enough of them that we don’t need to exaggerate or make up new ones.

        Regardless of what you think of Tesla, “recall” here doesn’t mean what people expect it to mean.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 hours ago

          Sorry we don’t think like that anymore. Nuance and multiple truths are a waste of time. Elon supports a Republican that means he is bad and everything he does is bad and everything he has ever done is bad and he has no vision or leadership of his own he is just a rich asshole using Daddy’s money to buy cars and rockets and Twitter. Thus he is unworthy of praise for anything at all that he has done since he was born into a life of luxury and anything he touches is automatically shit worthy of being canceled or outlawed.

      • @ForgotAboutDre
        link
        English
        49 hours ago

        They sold a bad product that needs fixed, bad software shouldn’t get an exception. The warning icons were probably not compliant and should never have left the factory.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 hours ago

          The warning icons were the exact same size as the car I had before that. No recall on that car, and if anything icons were even easier to see because the contrast was higher and they are closer to your face.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19 hours ago

      The fix is simple correct informative headlining from media “Tesla issues over the air update to resolve X thing related safety recall affecting X amount of customer vehicles”

      It’s not NHTSA’s fault media does their job badly.

  • @firepenny
    link
    English
    129 hours ago

    I’m still not sure why people buy this pos strapped to wheels? The quality is sub par at best.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    910 hours ago

    If Elon’s DOGE department is as efficient and top-notch in terms of quality, I think the US is on its way to golden times. amirite

  • @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    English
    310 hours ago

    Why the cybertruck picture? They aren’t trying to say that there were already 700.000 crappy tin boxes in the wild, or are they? 😉

    • kamenLady.
      link
      English
      410 hours ago

      The article isn’t really clear, it doesn’t exactly name the vehicles affected. But only mentions & shows the cybertruck.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 hours ago

        Gotta isolate the bad press to the obvious turd even though I bet they all have a similar system with similar flaws