• @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    English
    331 day ago

    “Slavery-like conditions”, as defined by Brazilian law, include debt bondage and work that violates human dignity.

    Remember this, everybody.

    • @clutchtwopointzero
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Violation of work dignity is part of mainland Chinese work culture. I guess the big heads in China still don’t understand the complaint

    • @TankovayaDiviziya
      link
      English
      -21 day ago

      They will still say “capitalism bad”.

      Capitalism isn’t perfect, but it’s the better system we have so far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1122 days ago

    ‘slavery’ in quotes really seems to soften the blow. Like the time I ‘punched’ my boss.

    • @TankovayaDiviziya
      link
      English
      61 day ago

      It’s probably quoting the Brazilian authorities. Also, journalists are afraid of being litigated of defamation in case the situation and story turns out not what it initially appears to be.

    • @Buffalox
      link
      English
      11 day ago

      It’s in quotes because they weren’t fully paid for.

  • @ZILtoid1991
    link
    English
    232 days ago

    There’s a good reason why their cars are cheap, and only one part of it is Chinese state subsidies.

    • toofpic
      link
      English
      61 day ago

      The conditions were created by a Brazilian building contractor. It was not the factory environment, but the construction project environment.

  • @Itdidnttrickledown
    link
    English
    472 days ago

    You know the irony of this picture is that in the early 90’s myself and eight others tricked out a cargo container with scaffold build bunks on a job. We were not alone in doing this. We paid the plant we were working at a very small amount of money for electricity and used the showers in their plant locker room. We were of course being paid and were free to run to town anytime. We had large cookouts on any days off we had. Which were very few. Good times. I remember a week in Vegas after we finally got laid off.

    Those poor souls though if they were forced to live like that need to be compensated.

  • BentiGorlich
    link
    fedilink
    142 days ago

    I think the destinction between the chinese firm constructing the site and BYD itself is quite important here. I am absolutely not a fan of chinese car manufacturers but its just not the same as if BYD was operating the site right now and this news came to light

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 days ago

      If you outsource your work, you outsource your reputation. BYD is absolutely responsible for the conditions of the workers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        352 days ago

        Some would argue that this is precisely why they ‘outsource’ just like mobsters do. It gives plausible deniability.

      • @kippinitreal
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Absolutely, ignorance is tantamount to complicity. Especially since BYD will earn a profit on their slave labor.

      • BentiGorlich
        link
        fedilink
        -112 days ago

        The site is not yet in operation. That has nothing to do with outsourcing… Its maybe bad supervision, but honestly most manufacturers fall in that category

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 day ago

          It’s not “outsourcing” in the common use of the term, but it’s establishing plausible deniability between the brand and the practice, which is “outsourcing” in an ironic sense.

          That said, I find the deniability completely implausible. BYD would be intimately aware of the progress and happenings on that site.

    • @hmancuso
      link
      English
      262 days ago

      It is the same, sorry. When you hire a third party to build or expand your business, you’re accountable for what happens under your nose. Simply pointing fingers to outsourced work as if it were beyond one’s control does not cut here. If you wish to operate in Brazil, you must comply with local legislation. And stating that some companies break the law is the same as saying that some people are turning a blind eye to the legislation, too. BYD management must choose which side of the legal fence they want to be. Cheers!

  • @surph_ninja
    link
    English
    -12 days ago

    All of those chip factories Congress is funding building in the US? Congress is also trying to pass legislation to import underpaid Taiwanese labor for them. I expect the conditions won’t be better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      prolly worthy of a whole 'nather post rather than derailing this one that isn’t about the US nor Taiwan.

      • @surph_ninja
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        My point is, it’s a trend we’re seeing in exploitation of factory workers where countries are trying to bring back manufacturing from China. A lot of the domestic manufacturing in Brazil is due to the high import tariffs, which is gaining popularity here in the states, so I expect we’ll see an increase of this kinda exploitation.

        But yeah, you’re probably right.

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      32 days ago

      Ah, I’ve asked my late dad’s friend recently how did it happen that my dad left Samsung (he didn’t tell me), and it was generally the same story about the famed Asian work ethic. Hardly compatible with correctness, having dignity and not being a snitch.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    -232 days ago

    A socialist corporation is still a corporation.

    Aka parasite

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 days ago

      They aren’t state owned, they’re the largest private company in China (by number of employees), and have had plenty of issues with the authorities there.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -132 days ago

        It is a legal entity incorporated under the laws of PRC lol

        It is a fiction of Chinese law with everything that entails

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 day ago

          That’s not how Chinese law works.

          Chinese law requires that foreign businesses operate under the Chinese government. It does no require Chinese businesses do that though. That’s the whole reason why everyone says it’s unfair, China gives their own country an advantage.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -72 days ago

        A corporate entity sanctioned by the Communist part of China