Summary

A post-election survey by Priorities USA found that voters in key swing states prioritized economic concerns like inflation over Donald Trump’s role in the January 6 Capitol attack.

Many did not view Trump as a continued threat to democracy, including key Biden-to-Trump voters.

Efforts by Kamala Harris’ campaign to highlight Trump’s authoritarian tendencies failed to resonate, as Trump’s image as a “successful businessman” persisted.

Democrats underestimated voters’ lack of hostility toward Trump, particularly among younger non-white voters, complicating their strategy in the 2024 election.

  • @Jimmycakes
    link
    231 day ago

    The fbi didn’t care taking years to arrest people the court system didn’t care giving out mickey mouse sentences. This isn’t on the American public. Dems still don’t fucking get it

    • @Zak
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This isn’t on the American public.

      It’s on the substantial fraction that voted for the asshole.

      Everybody saw January 6. Everybody heard the call to Raffensperger. At least, everybody who’s paying the least bit of attention did, and I say this as a person who does not spend much time following political news.

      I especially blame people who voted for him because of prices. I don’t expect an advanced understanding of supply chains, but do people think the USA has a command economy? The president does not set prices, or have much ability to influence them.

  • @Snapz
    link
    131 day ago

    America has the attention span of…

  • @Ensign_Crab
    link
    English
    111 day ago

    Don’t blame voters for leadership’s lack of urgency.

  • @Nightwingdragon
    link
    English
    462 days ago

    Because the DOJ didn’t care. Neither did Biden.

    The day that Garland got sworn in, there should have been a warrant issued for Trump’s arrest on treason charges. Given his unique position as not only a threat to national security, but also a fight risk, Trump needed some 5 star accomodations at ADX-Florence until the threat to national security has been fully investigated and neutralized.

    If they could literally hunt down Edward Snowden in real time like a real-time game of Carmen Sandiego, they can have Trump brought in for treason. Lock him up in ADX-Florence during the investigation to make sure he doesn’t hop on a private jet and head straight to Saudi Arabia or Russia or something.

    The FBI, CIA, NSA or whoever executed the Mar-A-Lago raid absolutely should not have given Trump a heads up as a courtesy. Show up, secure the documents, escort Trump out in handcuffs and take him and everybody who even walked into that room in the past six months straight to Colorado. Under no circumstances should securing top secret documents be treated with the same urgency as rescheduling an inconvenient doctor’s appointment.

    If the DOJ wasn’t going to take this seriously, why should the people?

    • @Zak
      link
      51 day ago

      The day that Garland got sworn in, there should have been a warrant issued for Trump’s arrest on treason charges.

      That would have been foolish both legally and politically.

      Garland should have appointed a special prosecutor immediately rather than delaying for a year and a half. Direct involvement of the administration would have raised questions of political bias and revenge with both the courts and the public. A prosecution for treason, which is defined very narrowly would raise similar questions.

      The charges against him for January 6 would have likely derailed his campaign and could have led to a lengthy prison sentence had they been filed 18 months earlier. He is not a young man; chances are strong it would have been effectively a life term.

      • @Nightwingdragon
        link
        English
        51 day ago

        Garland should have appointed a special prosecutor immediately rather than delaying for a year and a half. Direct involvement of the administration would have raised questions of political bias and revenge with both the courts and the public.

        I completely disagree with this logic. What you are saying is that the President would be essentially immune from prosecution even before that terrible SC decision because prosecuting the former president would have been bad optics anyway. Heaven for-fucking-bid. All this does is strengthen the two-tier justice system in this country.

        A prosecution for treason, which is defined very narrowly would raise similar questions.

        The man stole countless boxes of national security secrets, stuffed them in a golf club bathroom, and his son-in-law magically got $2 billion out of nowhere. The man held meetings in the white house with foreign representatives, behind closed doors, without allowing US translators or note-takers in the room.

        That’s treason. At the very least, put treason charges before the American people and let a jury decide. I stand by my belief: The man should have had a permanent stay at ADX-Florence the minute those boxes were found.

        • @Zak
          link
          124 hours ago

          the President would be essentially immune from prosecution

          What is it you think a special prosecutor does?

          The man stole countless boxes of national security secrets, stuffed them in a golf club bathroom, and his son-in-law magically got $2 billion out of nowhere. The man held meetings in the white house with foreign representatives, behind closed doors, without allowing US translators or note-takers in the room.

          The first of those things is very much illegal, and the special prosecutor who was appointed too late did indict him for it. On a different timeline with a different judge, it likely would have resulted in a conviction and a lengthy prison term.

          The other two are very suspicious. It’s very likely there were crimes surrounding those events, but they are not, themselves crimes. They certainly aren’t treason against the United States, which

          shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

          Now it’s possible some of those foreign representatives could be considered “enemies”, and possible he gave them secret information, which would qualify as “aid and comfort”. The next thing the constitution requires is

          No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

          And sure, if that burden is met, he should be charged. Otherwise, charges that are actually likely to hold up in court are more appropriate.

          • @Nightwingdragon
            link
            English
            223 hours ago

            the President would be essentially immune from prosecution

            What is it you think a special prosecutor does?

            The idea of a “special prosecutor” is and always has been redundant. If I’m going to go after a political opponent, what is the difference between doing it myself and hiring someone to do it for me? If people are going to think it’s political persecution, they’re going to think that way whether I do it myself or hire someone to do it under my watch. The end result is the same. I can guarantee you that absolutely no AG is going to appoint a special prosecutor who isn’t going to do exactly what the AG would have done themselves anyway.

            shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

            And exactly what the fuck did you think Donald Trump was going to do with a room full of national security secrets stolen, hidden, and locked in a golf course bathroom? Some light reading while taking a dump? What did you think the Saudis gave Kushner $2 billion for? A birthday present?

            • @Zak
              link
              122 hours ago

              exactly what the fuck did you think Donald Trump was going to do with a room full of national security secrets

              Something very crooked, for which he should be in prison.

              Most things that are crooked and harmful to the country are not treason, and many things that might be treason are difficult to prove as treason due to the unique constraints on prosecuting that crime. We have other criminal charges for those acts, and Trump was, in fact charged with felonies for them. The prosecution was started too late, for which I do blame the Biden administration and specifically Garland.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    372 days ago

    Serious question, why should they have cared? The Dept of Justice didn’t care. US Attorney General Merrick Garland didn’t care. President Joe Biden didn’t care. If anyone actually cared, Trump would be in prison for treason, but the U.S. clearly has a two-tiered justice system that lets you engage in a coup as long as you’re considered wealthy enough.

    Both sides called each other a threat to democracy, and neither side actually backed up those claims. When the Dems tried, their donors got mad at them and they shut up, because being rude to fascists is a hard line in our country. Voters saw this and decided it was all smoke, so they focused on what each candidate was promising them. Harris promised 4 more years of a status quo that was hurting them, and Trump promised change.

    • @mojofrododojo
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      wealthy

      white enough. if a bunch of people with melanin, whether they were from africa, the middle east or asia, had stormed the capitol and SMEARED SHIT ON THE WALLS INSIDE, they would have been met with a brutal, violent and LIVE FIRE response.

      bet.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        21 day ago

        There would have been more than just Capitol police present, to be certain.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 days ago

    as Trump’s image as a “successful businessman” persisted.

    FUCKING HOW!?!? How does anyone not know this loser chucklefuck would be richer if he’d just put his money away in investments and that he lost so much money over the years because he’s a shitty business man and the only inklings of success he’s ever had are because he’s a bastard mafioso who doesn’t pay anyone.

    • @eran_morad
      link
      402 days ago

      I’d be willing to wager that your average Joe has not a fucking clue what an index fund is. Probably 1 in 10 could explain mathematically compound interest. If that.

      • @thesohoriots
        link
        English
        282 days ago

        A very, very low number know how our tax brackets work, so compound interest is some intergalactic conspiracy.

        • @sensiblepuffin
          link
          72 days ago

          Too many Americans celebrate ignorance, it’s depressing as fuck.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The orange fuck should’ve been in prison before the fucking midterms of the biden administration…

  • @FiremanEdsRevenge
    link
    442 days ago

    And the normalization continues. Living in fucking bizarro world.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      424 hours ago

      Lack of education and endless propaganda

  • @Uruanna
    link
    23
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I was pretty sure the fucking DOJ didn’t care that Trump instigated Jan. 6. And when the people saw that it was going nowhere fast, their money became more important. It’s not like voting for Harris was going to change anything anyway, none of the investigations were pointing anywhere to jail time or barely a conviction. Even the only one that went well is ending with the judge signalling that there will be absolutely zero jail time or fine or literally anything in the upcoming sentencing. What the fuck are the voters expected to think of it?

    The only thing this article is talking about is that actual treason and attempted coup are used as a boogeyman being waved around to tell people to “vote for us or it will be worse” but never actually doing anything about it. Now they lost because they ended up doing nothing about anything. “There’s nothing that comes to mind that I would do differently.”

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    202 days ago

    This is because there are a lot of very stupid people.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      62 days ago

      And they’re all in the Democratic leadership.

      How the fuck can the public at large be expected to recognize Trump as the fascist threat he is when the opposition itself doesn’t even slightly take the issue seriously?

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        41 day ago

        Democrats are not the party of leading by example. They’re the party of “Do as we say, not as we do.”

        They want lockstep voting for their candidates no matter what misgivings the electorate has, but always find some Manchin to come up with some nitpick to block legislation.

        They want us to treat January 6 seriously when they demonstrated that they had no interest at all in prosecuting.

        They want us to treat our votes as something valuable and precious that we must jealously guard so that we never lose them. And then they don’t try to shore up voting rights. And don’t hold primaries. If you regard voting with such contempt, why shouldn’t we?

      • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Oh no, don’t you realize , the DNC is going to magically change and actually win elections consistently for the next 20 years so they can reverse all that trump has ruined. The only catch is you can’t talk about how unlikely that is and you have to stick your thumb up you ass until then otherwise it won’t happen and it’s your fault.

  • @Maggoty
    link
    102 days ago

    We got clear polling and focus groups on this. Voters didn’t believe it was a big deal because the DOJ didn’t arrest him. They know how the justice system operates and seeing it just not operate informed their opinion.

    • @ovalofsand
      link
      English
      02 days ago

      Sources? I’d like to check that out

  • beefbot
    link
    fedilink
    212 days ago

    I don’t fuckin buy that for a second. Someone here is BSsing

    • Atelopus-zeteki
      link
      fedilink
      242 days ago

      Won the popular vote by the thinnest of margins, there was no mandate for trump. Congress, too, the tiny-est of margins. More media normalizing of fascist bullshit.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    142 days ago

    eyup. people seem to have no grasp on the fragility of democracy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 days ago

      That’s because a combination of the media’s obsession with horserace politics for ratings and the Dem leadership’s insistence that “bipartisanship” is the highest political virtue possible has succeeded in convincing the average voter that the fascists are just regular conservatives and worrying about the imminent demise of democracy is for sore losers who are probably too woke or something 😮‍💨

      Also: a shitload of “it couldn’t happen here where we have an infallible constitution to protect us” American exceptionalism idiocy.