- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Importantly, the law authorizing this doesn’t authorize the president to reverse the ban. Trump has used it before too.
So reversing this likely means an unusual ruling from the courts, or getting congress to change things. Both possible, but take a lot more effort than simply issuing an executive order.
You must log in or register to comment.
People should read the first chapter of “The Ministry for the Future”. People will start dieing by the millions due to heat waves, it’s going to happen even if we stop burning oil now because of how long the feedback loop takes. Drilling more lengthens this trend into a future where billions die.
This doesn’t mean the overall system is stable; there will still be ice melting (albeit more slowly than if we kept on burning stuff) but it’s a vast improvement over the alternative.
That entire book should be required reading for everyone over the age of thirty.
And I’m only setting the cut off there because the under thirties have enough shit on their plates.
He is relying on an obscure provision of a 1953 law, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, which he says gives him the authority for this executive order.
He could have done this the entire time!?!?
He could have, but didn’t need to; he could simply choose to not issue leases in these places.
Yes…that oil increase is largely on private land, which means the President has had limited power to do anything about it
picked up the pace under Biden, who had approved more permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands by last October than former President Donald Trump had by the same point in his presidency.
The ban affects the entire Eastern Seaboard, the Pacific Coast along California, Oregon and Washington, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the Northern Bering Sea.
So that basically just leaves the Texas and Louisiana Gulf coast, and part of the Alaskan coast?
Yes, and state waters (those less than 3 miles from shore) where the federal government isn’t the one making the management decisions.
And Hawaii?
I don’t see that in the list, but Hawaii has a very different geology which makes oil much less likely there
Sure—I thought the previous comment was just trying to identify any US coastlines not on the list, not filtering by reason for exclusion.
I did not exclude Hawaii on the basis of oil prospects, I just forgot about it.
This feels kinda like bike shedding to bring up currently with the executive, legislative, and judicial branches all bought and paid for by oligarchs, but isn’t that executive branch overreach where the legislative branch should be who is determining this?
Hilarious. Biden oversaw record oil and gas drilling throughout his entire presidency, dwarfing that of W, Obama, and Trump.
Now he was to slow things down so Dems can score political points when Repugs immediately open the drilling floodgates. Seriously pathetic Biden, you could have actually done something for the environment during the past 4 years but chose corporate profits over people’s lives instead, every time.
In many ways, the ban is symbolic… On Monday Mr. Trump called Mr. Biden’s move “ridiculous” and said he would revoke the ban. “I’ll unban it immediately,” he said on the Hugh Hewitt radio program.
Couldn’t genocide joe have done this like 4 years ago?
And if dude can just do this, can’t trump just undo?
No, the law here allows the President to designate areas as off-limits, but doesn’t provide for the President reversing such a decision. It would take either Congress changing the rules, or the courts to invalidate the rule.
So it’s a bit more than posturing.
And he didn’t need to four years ago, because he could simply not issue new drilling leases in these places.
Besides, it’s not like Biden will ever run for office again. Posturing is worthless to him right now.
I find it amusing when liberals believe the rule of law applies to fascism, instead of being dictated by fascism.
Laws only matter if they are enforced.
I thought there was like a 60 day window where the new president can just say “nah” but anything established longer than that required a process to discourage jerking people around
That window is provided by the CRA and only applies to agency rule-making, which is not the process that Biden used here.
Also the CRA does not allow the President to say “nah”. It allows Congress to say “nah”.
There is a window, but it requires a vote by both houses of congress. Offshore drilling bans are popular, so there’s a decent chance of peeling off a couple of Republicans and preventing it from passing.
GeNoCiDe JoE ThAnKs YoU fOR yOuR tRuMp SuPpOrT bEcAuSe BoTh SiDeS
Add it to the pile of his accomplishments
