On a technical level, how is TikTok being blocked/banned in the US?

Can I still sideload the app to my phone? Is it only being banned from the two big app stores? Is there a penalty for being found in possession of the software on US soil?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 hours ago

    No app store download and no hosting in the u.s. Even if they weren’t blocking u s. Users the amount of video traffic suddenly hitting their servers outside the country would cripple their infrastructure and seriously hinder other Internet traffic. Since net neutrality doesn’t exist anymore, ISPs can be paid to block it or seriously cripple it.

    Still totally legal to install the app and access the content. However the same content will be reposted to other platforms which will be a great passive revenue stream for someone.

  • @Evotech
    link
    127 hours ago

    Don’t worry, trump will just cancel that whole shit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6312 hours ago

    I believe I read that the ban prohibited new downloads but wouldn’t stop existing users from continuing to use, however the parent company kinda put a middle finger up and said they would stop service in the US completely, probably by IP/geofencing? Take with grain of salt.

    • elgordino
      link
      fedilink
      3712 hours ago

      Yeah. ByteDance, the owners, are choosing to block US users to kick up the maximum fuss possible. From my understanding they didn’t need to, they just risked withering away because there would be no new users.

      • @FuryMaker
        link
        English
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, they won’t geofence. Still money to be made from existing US users. And no one puts principles above profits.

  • @A_Union_of_Kobolds
    link
    2812 hours ago

    Afaik you should still be able to sideload it and use the service with a VPN

    • @modusOP
      link
      1312 hours ago

      So are American ISPs being forced to block TikTok’s server’s IPs?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It will probably be removed from DNS (and appstores). Google IANA , and DNS if you want to know more.

        PS Ofc the company itself will stop its services. It’s not like they want beef with a whole country (any, not just US).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1712 hours ago

        afaik the legislation doesn’t include active blocking of a qualifying service’s (which includes tiktok by name, but is not limited to only it or bytedance) traffic…

        it only prohibits the distribution of their ‘apps’ (such as via google/apple ‘stores’)–this is the part that does most the heavy lifting, and hosting of their services within the u.s.

      • @cm0002
        link
        912 hours ago

        No, US is not blocking it (there isn’t even infrastructure in place for such a request, we don’t have a “Great Firewall of China”)

        However, the VPN is required because reportedly TikTok themselves will stop allowing US based users to see content which is above and beyond what the law calls for

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            147 minutes ago

            Good thing we live a country with plenty of good honorable ISPs. Xfinity, Verizon and uhh… What’s that other one that offers 10mbps for $200/m?

      • Porto881
        link
        English
        312 hours ago

        I dont think any ISP will be forced to given that both the current and next WH have said they won’t enforce a ban. If it goes dark, it’ll be TikTok themselves blocking access

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1212 hours ago

    I believe Google and Apple are to be fined if they don’t remove the app from their stores.

    We don’t have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs, so current users will still be able to access it. So you shouldn’t need a VPN.

    Android users could side load the app if they want.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 seconds ago

          Not quite. You don’t need any app store at all.
          You literally download an APK file from a website or anywhere, then install it directly. Could even be a friend with a thumb drive. Doesn’t matter how you get it, it’s just a file.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 hours ago

        On Android you can download apps (.APK files) from the web, and install them without any app store.

    • lurch (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      12 hours ago

      We don’t have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs

      I disagree. It may be able to circumvent it, but US ISPs could configure their DNS servers to not resolve the domains and their routers to drop packages from and to these IPs. It will affect everyone who uses their ISPs default config for DNS and not uses VPN/Tor, which is a lot of people.

      The question is: Is there a legal procedure to do that? For malware they are sometimes doing things like that (seizing botnet control domains etc), but tiktok isn’t officially malware, AFAIK.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      312 hours ago

      Public DNS servers hosted in the US will get notified to delist the domain or direct it to an alternate IP. ISPs will get notified to route IP traffic elsewhere.

      • borari
        link
        fedilink
        1411 hours ago

        Source this information, because it is almost positively incorrect.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -211 hours ago

          I have personal experience with backbone carriers.

          • borari
            link
            fedilink
            1111 hours ago

            Yeah, I do to. We’re not talking about theoretically blocking access to a site nation wide. We’re talking about the TikTok ban, which doesn’t stipulate any sort of network blocking, it’s just a delisting from the app stores.

            The government has never required dns providers to remove records for a domain, or required ISPs to null route traffic to IPs. That’s almost certainly a First Amendment issue, and I can only imagine that such an order would be immediately challenged in court.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              011 hours ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States

              Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA)

              In March 2008, the New York Times reported that a blocklist published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency established under the Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 and other federal legislation, included websites, so that US companies are prohibited from doing business with those websites and must freeze their assets. The blocklist had the effect that US-based domain name registrars must block those websites. According to the article, eNom, a private domain name registrar and Web hosting company operating in the US, disables domain names that appear on the blocklist.[38] It described eNom’s disabling of a European travel agent’s web sites advertising travel to Cuba, which appeared on the list.[39] According to the report, the US government claimed that eNom was “legally required” to block the websites under US law, even though the websites were not hosted in the US, were not targeted at US persons, and were legal under foreign law.

              As far as null routing IPs, we’ll see.

              • borari
                link
                fedilink
                511 hours ago

                We won’t see, it’s never happened and isn’t a requirement in the ban bill.

                Read the cited article in Wikipedia. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407043030/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html eNom didn’t block DNS users from resolving the domains, they were the registrar for the domains. The domain owners were paying eNom to list their records. As soon as the domain owners moved to a different DNS provider, anyone in the US would be able to access the sites again, even users using eNom public dns servers (if they exist idk).

                You didn’t cite a case of the US blocking DNS providers from resolving a domain, you cited a case of the US blocking a registrar from doing business with an entity on a blocklist published by OFAC.

        • borari
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          This is not an action that will be initiated by the incoming ban, just fyi.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -211 hours ago

          To be fair, it wouldn’t be every ISP that would reroute, just backbone ones. Their routing tables would filter down to regional and last mile networks.

          • borari
            link
            fedilink
            411 hours ago

            When have any Tier One providers in the Is done such a thing in the US?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      he wouldn’t be able to, anyway.

      the deadline is the sunday the 19th. monday the 20th is mlk day (federal holiday, courthouses closed. ag couldn’t file proceedings to enforce the legislation) and the last morning of the biden administration. diaperking is then in charge. even though it was his idea to begin with, he’s flopped on the issue.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    612 hours ago

    The US servers are being shut off because they don’t want to risk the fines even though the current administration said they wouldn’t enforce them. TikTok will go black for us users tomorrow. I’m sure there will some way around it for those dedicated enough to find it but the average user will lose access on 1/19.

  • Fugtig Fisk
    link
    fedilink
    512 hours ago

    I believe thar they said in the news here in Europe, that any service that distributes the tok tok app to the USA market, will be fined $5000 per download!

    It will not be illegal to have but it won’t be updated in the US market and new users won’t be able to download it

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    311 hours ago

    Generally the large ISP will receive an order to sinkhole the tt domains for their users. And most normal people use a modem supplied by the ISP it will use the ISP DNS server or their phones will use the mobile providers DNS servers.

    It will not block a determined person but it will effectively block it for a large chunk of the US internet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      140 minutes ago

      Man I wish I invested in some VPN stock a few years ago. I’m sure they’ll be making a killing with all the us porn bans and now this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -712 hours ago

    The US won’t block it, but it will be blocked. Tik Tok itself said it will turn off it’s servers and block US ips like it did with India.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/17/politics/tiktok-ban-supreme-court/index.html

    So it will be tik tok itself enforcing the ban. Which is hilarious. USA showed all this bravado and now has to turn around and beg tik tok to return. I fully expect in the long run tik tok will be sold to Chinese agent Elon Musk and be turned into the spy apparatus US claims it to be. The whole situation shows what a clown USA is.

    • @False
      link
      211 hours ago

      Why anyone who matters care enough to beg them to come back?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        How should I know? But you have Biden insisting he won’t enforce the law and Trump promising he’ll stop the ban and make sure tik tok stays. He’s even inviting their CEO to his inauguration. On the other hand it’s tik tok threatening to shutdown now if they don’t fix it sooner. It’s a strange turn of events but I have no idea why USA thinks begging is the appropriate move.

        I mean seriously, if you want an answer ask the US government why all the important people like both presidents are begging. It’s not me making this decision.

        Edit

        Don’t take my word for it. Here’s an article by the rolling stones magazine on it and how all the important people are scrambling to save tik tok. No joke, I’d like someone to explain why all these important people care.

        https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/biden-dems-tiktok-ban-1235239244/