The push comes as India seeks greater regulatory control over global tech companies. The initiative would require manufacturers to include the government’s GOV.in app store and related apps like BHIM, DigiLocker, VoterID on smartphones sold from India.

Beyond pre-installation, they also requested that their apps be available for download outside the company’s app stores from third-party sources without triggering “untrusted source” warnings.

  • ElPussyKangaroo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll be the paragraph guy today.

    BHIM stands for BHarat Interface for Money, a payment application that uses India’s money transfer protocol called United Payment Interface (UPI). This makes all payments cashless, from ₹1 to ₹1,00,000. No transaction fees, as of yet.

    Digilocker is a government document vault app that allows digital copies of documents to be enforced. You don’t need to carry around the physical copies, the QR code generated by the app is scanned by specialised scanners that validate the validity of the document and also fetches any relevant records. This includes the Driver’s License, Aadhar Card (Indian National Identity Card), PAN Card (Permanent Account Number; used for what is essentially a 2 Factor Authentication system of documents for verification of identity), etc.

    Voter ID app is to identify your voting region, and make any changes to the details of your Voter ID.

    The Gov.in store is new to me and I don’t think I need one more store on my device, but hey… I don’t use an iPhone 😄.

    Why is all of this not a single app? Idk.

    Coming back to the point, I don’t mind having important apps like these pre-installed. It helps to have these for people who aren’t as technically inclined as you’d hope.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why is all of this not a single app?

      Because they have very different functions though all associated with the government. It’s just better to separate apps with different functions.

      Thanks for the explanation.

      • ElPussyKangaroo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fair enough. I just wish it were a single super-app since that’s more user-friendly. But its fine.

        • Tangent5280
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s an indian government venture. If the scope is too big app updates would be spaced out to every 8 years

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean they are known to be invasive, even trying to ban VPNs so don’t be too surprised lol

      • ElPussyKangaroo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lmao. No. UPI is an open standard I think… Open as in you can apply to use it. It is run via the Reserve Bank of India to ensure safety and validity.

        But no. None of these are open source. Location tracking is, I think, not across them all…

        UPI apps use it because it’s easier to pinpoint where a payment was made, thus ensuring you can verify the payment receiver. That’s all I understand about it atm.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      BHIM stands for BHarat Interface for Money, a payment application that uses India’s money transfer protocol called United Payment Interface (UPI). This makes all payments cashless, from ₹1 to ₹1,00,000. No transaction fees, as of yet

      In addition to BHIM, there are lot of third party apps for UPI.

        • astro_ray@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          You might think that, but creating a third party app is not comes with a lot of hassles. One needs to get license to access the infrastructure.

            • Tangent5280
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Stops a lot of scammers and if some gets through there might be a paper trail to follow and link the accounts involved to real people.

              • ElPussyKangaroo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Especially with finance related stuff like this, its very crucial that such regulations exist. You’re right.

  • ctx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is so annoying, I don’t want bloatware on my new iPhone.

  • surph_ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wild how many people preach from their high horse every time a non-western country does this, as if there aren’t western backdoors built into all of these.

    I’m against all government backdoors and spying efforts, but let’s not pretend they’re attempting anything the west has not already successfully done. There’s definitely an air of racism to the double standard.

    • just_another_person
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      What backdoors are pre installed on western phones? I’m talking actual backdoors on the device itself. I feel researches would have already found and altered to some very publicly.

        • just_another_person
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          These are neither confirmed, nor have ever been proven, and don’t deal with phones.

          The first link is about networking hardware, which has already been found by security researchers long ago.

          The second is about an attempt at doing something like a backdoor that never came to fruition.

          The last link has never been observed or proven, and how it would work is impossible to know. Having a “backdoor” on a CPU is meaningless without the other attached hardware to work with. Some would say impossible, and made up.

          • surph_ninja
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you don’t believe anything that’s been leaked by whistleblowers? You think the Snowden stuff is all fake?

            • Hominine
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Depending a lie with whataboutism is a bad look.

              Why not just admit you don’t know, but enjoy being paranoid and conspiratorial in this space?

              • surph_ninja
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                What lie? What “whataboutism”? The person tried to deny there’s any surveillance built into western technologies, and I gave a prominent example to prove them wrong. That’s not what “whataboutism” means.

                Weird move for y’all to burn your astroturf accounts gaslighting people about what we’ve all personally witnessed from whistleblowers. You really expect that to work?

            • just_another_person
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              The NSA activities Snowden leaked were specifically happening in data and telecom centers to snoop traffic in transit. He make known some secret programs about exploiting and compromising devices, but of that’s already known as a possibility. He never detailed anything about backdoors on phones from manufacturers as you’ve suggested.

              • surph_ninja
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                2 months ago

                Right, the Snowden leaks did not include phone backdoors. Just everything else you denied.

                • just_another_person
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Lol I’m not denying anything but your misguided comment. It’s not accurate.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What are the nature of the apps? If it’s just things like digital IDs and government services, that’s not bad since it helps tech illiterate people accessing them. Big room for fash fuckery though.

    And as always, preinstalled apps should be deletable.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. If you allow one country to shirk the norm, other countries will also start pushing

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think the slippery slope argument works here, you can object to any rules and regulations by saying other countries would start pushing bad rules and regulations if you comply. It’s not all or nothing.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think of it as slippery slope, I think of it as setting precedent

      • Shabablinchikow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Russia already has a norm to show “Russian apps” the first time activating an iPhone or iPad, so that ship has sailed

        • TheTechnician27
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          The ship hasn’t sailed; the more countries you let do that, the more problematic the precedent becomes. This isn’t a binary thing.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It really should be a binary thing. Company policy should be to ship the same, base OS to every customer in every country, and the only differences would be configuration for things like which radio bands to activate.

  • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t see it necessarely as a bad thing. I would rather have my gov id app (for taxes, id and driving licence, public services info) on my phone when i buy it, rather than candy crush and other fucking bloatware. I think it would also help a lot of non-tech savy users set up their phones quickly.

    Second of all, gov ID apps having their own store on the side is good. Them being only available on google’s store makes it so that if you want to access public services from your state you have to go through google (?), it is clearly not acceptable by a government standpoint, It is even worse than a monopoly.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would rather have my gov id app

      I’d rather have none of that. Give me basic system apps and an app store, and I’ll handle the rest.

      If an org wants stuff pre-installed, there should be an option for rolling out a batch of app installs when issuing a new device (probably exists?). Outside of that, leave the base install as bare as possible, and give me an option to import everything from my old device (exists).

    • trolololol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you want apple to help pre installing something so you didn’t depend on Apple when users actually want to use the app. Can you tell me how this makes sense?

      • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its not about nicely asking apple for “help” pre installing some apps, it is forcing them to open up the os to different software sources.

        • trolololol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          So, no pre installs needed, all they want is what the EU did.

          We don’t need an article to say that.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really don’t mind the concept of preinstalled applications as long as they can be easily removed.

  • plz1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think Apple would pull out of India before they’d cave to this.

    • Xanthobilly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apple will do whatever is profitable. Corporations don’t have ethics.

      • kipo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep. Late-stage capitalism incentivizes and rewards unethical behavior.

    • Phoenix3875
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re pretty happy to comply with censorship in China though.

    • TheGrandNagus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t know why you’d think that? Apple is a publicly traded company that ultimately cares about profit and nothing else.

      They already comply with a bunch of stuff in China and other places, why would India be any different?

      • plz1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        To my knowledge, they don’t preload non-Apple apps on any country, including the full fascist ones.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Doesn’t Facebook come preinstalled on iphones? That should be their #1 advertising angle

          • plz1
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It does not come pre-installed

    • TheGrandNagus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The EU does not mandate that Apple preinstall government apps. Stop lying.

      The EU went the other way and mandated that more apps should be uninstallable.

        • TheGrandNagus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Every government tells every phone maker what to do with phones. You can’t, for example, have them using restricted frequencies. Funny that you think you have a gotcha there.

          Trying to equate mandating that the user can uninstall apps if they want (a massive win for the consumer and good for competition) to mandatory installation of government ID apps is hilariously pathetic.

            • L3sM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Saying someone is lying and telling someone to “fuck off” are not the same, one breaks rule 3 and the other does not.

                • L3sM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Sorry you feel that way!

      • kautau
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        lol yeah the EU mandates that users can delete more core pre-installed apps. It’s literally the opposite

        Apple will let users delete core apps, including the App Store, Messages, Photos, Camera, and Safari, for the first time.

    • FooBarrington
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fucking propaganda. It seriously enrages me how people like you have become so programmed that they’ll attribute everything to an organization you’ve been told to hate. Don’t you ever stop and see how you’re being used?