• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3012 hours ago

    In this day and age, people should learn how to text. That guy almost had to have an awkward voice conversation. 😳

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3012 hours ago

      Believe it or not, this is a perfect time to leave a voice mail. The not answering spam calls I am normalized with, but the refusal to use voice mail for important calls is inexcusable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        78 hours ago

        I don’t have a voicemail set up specifically because I don’t want to dial in to check it. If you’re a real person just text me to get my attention.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        410 hours ago

        Dunno about other countries, but in Brazil you have to pay to listen to your voicemail

      • There was a time where spam calls didn’t exist? I am pretty sure 2 seconds after Alexander Bell tested the first pair of phones, someone tried to sell him an extended warranty for his car.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          513 hours ago

          “Mr. Watson, come here. I want to see about extending your horseless carriage’s warranty”. - Definitely the first ever phone call.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7018 hours ago

    Real talk the lack of caller id for all businesses or government lines is insane.

    If you are not making a private call, on a private line, the I’d should be populated

    • @Crashumbc
      link
      English
      3717 hours ago

      The bigger issue here is spam calls.

      If that shit was stopped, people wouldn’t ignore unknown callers.

      While your solution is good it only solves part of the problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1517 hours ago

        No, if a company was calling me and I didn’t want to talk to them, I’d still be better informed with caller id.

        A spam call would be ignored because I wouldn’t recognize the business name

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1517 hours ago

      Many countries have this. It’s just just shitty American carriers that hold us back by gating anything and everything behind a fee.

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        515 hours ago

        Actually, in this case, it’s partially the opposite.

        The Madison River Telephone Company (later CenturyLink and now Lumen) started blocked calls and services from Vonage (VOIP) in 2005 because VOIP was a threat. The FCC stepped in and ruled against Madison River in what was really the beginning of Net Neutrality legislation.

        Their ruling established that phone carriers couldn’t discriminate against other services accessing their network and its features. Among those features is Caller ID. Since any. VOIP phone system doesn’t actually originate from a telephone exchange, so they all essentially have to “spoof” their Caller ID.

        The phone companies can’t block CallerID spoofing from spamme4s and scammers without violating a 20yo ruling from the FCC.

        • bountygiver [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          414 hours ago

          which is extremely outdated, with proper called ID these spoofed numbers should be presented as such on the caller ID

          • @chiliedogg
            link
            213 hours ago

            The problem is there is legitimate reason to spoof CID.

            VOIP is one. I also have the ability to do it when I make a call from my work cell to have it display the city switchboard so people both aren’t calling me when I’m off duty, but also so that the people receiving calls see a call from the City, not from some random dude.

            • @JordanZ
              link
              49 hours ago

              This is already being worked on with STIR/SHAKEN. Very similar to certificates with websites. You want to place a call as a certain number? Where is your proof you own that number? Now we’ll place your call. Your cell’s recent call list should already be showing little check marks on certain callers. Those are authenticated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      514 hours ago

      The issue is with cell phones and mobile networks. They don’t all support passing CNAM (caller name delivery) between them. I worked in telecom for over 15 years, dealt with only businesses, I never met a company that didn’t have CNAM set up.

  • @CuddlyCassowary
    link
    8819 hours ago

    Why didn’t they text? Cultural norms aside, texts usually go through more easily than calls in spotty areas. But yeah, I’ll take hypothermia and exposure over answering an unknown number any day.

    • @mipadaitu
      link
      English
      711 hours ago

      Modern search and rescue tools actually do send a text with a link to ping your exact location. The text is intended to be customized to the situation so they know it is legit.

      Clark, your mother Martha is worried about you. You are not in trouble. Please contact Metropolis PD to let us know you are safe, or click this link to share your location so we can come get you.

    • @GrammarPolice
      link
      -2717 hours ago

      I’m more likely to answer a call than respond to a text, and i feel like this is the same for most people. Besides, why would rescuers send a text?

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9320 hours ago

    I’m totally with the hiker on this one, and this illustrates why spam calls are more than just a nuisance.

  • @edgemaster72
    link
    English
    4819 hours ago

    I wouldn’t expect rescuers to be calling me (assuming this is legit), so yeah, I probably wouldn’t answer either

      • @edgemaster72
        link
        English
        1017 hours ago

        Well then since they presumably got the missing person’s number from someone that knows them and knows they were missing, maybe they should’ve called from that person’s phone

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    2018 hours ago

    …Dear Trevon, we’ve been trying to reach you about your car insurance…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2619 hours ago

    Weird story. If they needed rescuing and had cell coverage why would they need to wait for an incoming call?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3018 hours ago

      Iirc He wasn’t lost. Somebody told the authorities, that the guy was missing and that he wanted to go on a hike. So they called him to see if he really was lost. He didn’t answer the call, so they presumed he was injured or lost his phone. With this information they declared him lost and started a search.