What about other government workers, such as military, teachers, social workers, etc?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 days ago

    Cop unions are the worst unions. It’s like a doctor’s union that protects doctors from malpractice lawsuits. That’s not what they are for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        323 days ago

        The thin blue line flag was developed as a reaction to Black Lives Matter.

        Basically people asked the police to stop murdering minorities and the reply was that people should be grateful for the police for murderously guarding white privilege.

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen
    link
    223 days ago

    That union is always on the wrong side of support for other unions. ACAB forever.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    193 days ago

    I mean it’d be one thing if they lobbied for better working conditions and training. But they lobby to militarize themselves and thats a problem. At least in America.

  • @roofuskit
    link
    English
    173 days ago

    Here in the US they pretty much all do. And yes, 100% of labor should be unionized.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      133 days ago

      Yup. And while police unions are awful it’s a call to fix how police unions are formed and supported rather than deunionizing the police entirely.

      The saying is a bad apple spoils the bunch and there are a fuckton of bad apples in the police.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Police aren’t labour. Labour operate the means of production for the ruling class. The police use violence against labour to support the ruling class. It’s an important distinction.

      • Yes, that’s the reality. But if they actually operated the way people have been led to believe they do, then they would be as much of a labor force as the fire department.

        We should talk about getting the police to actually being the fairy tale people think it is first, though.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          That is impossible. If they didn’t do violence to citizens of a state on behalf of the state, then they are not police. They would be something else. A “citizen service league” or something.

      • @roofuskit
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah, treat other working stiffs as the enemy, that’ll help.

        Change hiring practices, change training, police can be a benefit.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          No. It will not help. The problem is not the individuals we hire. It is the job we hire them for. The JOB is not labour. It is violence. The purpose of the police is to maintain the state’s “legitimate monopoly on violence.” The reason every police officer exists in every nation is to do violence against members of a state on behalf of that state’s needs.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

          Police are not labour and this is well known. So well known that technically, police in North America (and likely other jurisdictions) are not allowed to form unions. If you take a close look at the “police unions” in North America, you will find that they are all actually “police associations.” They don’t enjoy the same rights and powers as an actual union, but they adopt all the trappings so that people don’t realize, and don’t think about the true relationship between citizen, state, and the police.

      • Bilb!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        I think it would be considered non-productive labor in the Marxist sense.

      • @roofuskit
        link
        English
        -13 days ago

        Oh they’re capital are they? I didn’t know they were ownership class.

  • Comrade Spood
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 days ago

    Cops serve and protect capital, not you. There is never going to be a situation where law enforcement doesn’t become authoritarian and only protect those in power. Law enforcements has routinely shown they are class traitors and have no qualms supporting corporations in crushing unions. Cops should not exist, let alone have unions, which will only ever be used to protect themselves from facing consequences and taking accountability. All WORKERS should be unionized. Cops are not workers, they are class traitors who wouldn’t think twice about arresting you for trying to use your union to get better working conditions. 40% of cops are abusers, and they only solve 2% of crime. Studies show rehabilition and restorative justice as well as providing people with their basic needs is more effective at reducing crime and protecting people. Abolish the police, abolish prisons, ACAB

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    33 days ago

    Everyone should form unions. Collective bargaining is the best and only realistic way to stand against capitalist overreach.

    That being said, a union of assholes is still a giant bag of assholes. The issue is that unions for anyone can’t be able to bypass responsibility and ethics. If they can, and the cop unions do, there’s a problem. They do need to be able to provide members with protection from false accusations, but police unions end up making it hard to remove officers from duty at all, even when the officer should be facing criminal charges.

    But saying that a group of employees can’t organize because of the job is just bullshit. Remember Regan and the ATC workers?

    Even the military should be able to, though I don’t know how in the hell that would work in practice.

    I’m not saying that unions are perfect, they aren’t. Police unions are a perfect example of how flawed they can end up. But they’re still the best tool we have as a populace, and everyone should be able to negotiate collectively

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 days ago

      If it doesn’t have the legal powers of a union, then it’s not a union. It would be impossible to have a military that is unionized in any meaningful sense of the word. Yes, they still have the power of collectivism, and they should still use that power to their common advantage, but that doesn’t make it a union.

      • southsamurai
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        Yeah, I can’t see it actually working right at all. It’s contrary to how a military body works.