Summary

Clarence Thomas criticized the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for ignoring Supreme Court precedent in a case involving David Smith, convicted of attempted murder, whose sentence was overturned due to procedural concerns.

Thomas argued the court violated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by re-evaluating evidence rather than deferring to previous rulings.

Critics highlighted Thomas’s hypocrisy, noting his role in overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, disregarding decades of precedent and leading to abortion bans in over 20 states.

  • @cabron_offsets
    link
    1319 days ago

    He can fuck off and die. Painfully, publicly, soon, and slowly.

        • @Thunderbird4
          link
          68 days ago

          It’s gonna be Aileen Cannon. She’s already proven that her only judicial competencies are complete deference and fealty to trump and disdain for impartiality and procedure, which are the only qualifications they’re looking for.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 days ago

            Which would continue the nightmare, making that person necessary to be gone too in order to make it passed the nightmare.

  • @SoftestSapphic
    link
    1089 days ago

    A SCOTUS member accepting bribes should come with the death penalty

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      229 days ago

      And not a painless one. I’m thinking the thing they did to highway thieves.

    • @stetech
      link
      89 days ago

      Cold-ass response. Imagine you’re the dude and were reading along here and maybe for the first time realizing that people don’t like you specifically for your actions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    919 days ago

    I’ve been waiting for this particular bit of brazen hypocrisy.

    By ignoring precedent in order to issue rulings clearly intended to establish precedents, the wholly corrupt and compromised SC effectively guaranteed that sooner or later, they’d have to do this.

    Outside of the warped context of a corrupt and compromised court, it’s actually very simple:

    Either precedent matters, in which case their Roe ruling, their gratuity ruling, their immunity ruling and a number of others are self-evidently flawed, or precedent doesn’t matter, in which case no other court has any duty to consider anything the SC does.

    One or the other.

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      269 days ago

      They have no intention of being consistent, or uphold the law; it can be both They will soon start shoving their political opponents in jail too.

  • @yesman
    link
    55
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    You can never tell with Thomas if he’s been bribed in advance or is soliciting a gratuity.

  • Baron Von J
    link
    509 days ago

    He’s upset they followed his precedent.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N
      link
      fedilink
      English
      339 days ago

      Shush. We don’t want that happening right now. Old Uncle Tom is somehow not the worst it could get.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        309 days ago

        He’s not the only one I’m talking about. The U.S. is run by the worse retirement home I have ever seen.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            49 days ago

            Cant im reinforcing myself in the basement, you can join me if ya wish but if you touch my sandwich makings im taking your hand.

    • @Hobbes_Dent
      link
      209 days ago

      Corruption just keeps on working without consequence.

      400 million temporarily embarrassed swindlers.

      • @Gradually_Adjusting
        link
        English
        129 days ago

        I think it’s safe to say Americans are now permanently embarrassed.

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    279 days ago

    Clarence Thomas is a bribe accepting crooked hypocrite who falls to pieces the second the doesn’t get what he wants. How is this news? I thought everyone knew that already?

  • @_stranger_
    link
    24
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    (For anyone unfamiliar with Uncle Ruckus, he was an Uncle Tom type character, and a white supremacist)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 days ago

      Only difference is Clarence Thomas gets paid to throw his beliefs out the window, Uncle Ruckus (no relation) did it just for the love of white people.

      Actually now that I think about it, I’m not really sure why Clarence Thomas does the shit he does…

      • @hedgehogging_the_bed
        link
        49 days ago

        He was educated in Catholic schools and was going to be a Priest. Thomas has done nothing but uphold the white Christian man’s power and privilege his entire life.

        Had to sit through someone’s gushing fanboy talk about this last year and I nearly threw up. He’s a gross misogynist and fucking smug about it too.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          39 days ago

          Many a person thinks that by upholding the power of the white Christian man they can remove one of the adjectives

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 days ago

    Am I wrong, or is he just signaling to allies how he will rule if this reaches the Supreme Court…?

    • @TehWorld
      link
      English
      119 days ago

      Was there ever a question?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Thomas’s hypocrisy

    looks at article

    He’s talking about a lower court not following a Supreme Court precedent.

    The Supreme Court is able to overrule Supreme Court precedent in later cases. It happens only rarely, but it does happen. There’s a list of such rulings somewhere I remember on Wikipedia, several pages. Roe v. Wade was one such example.

    But lower courts are not supposed to do that.

    goes looking for Wikipedia page

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions

    This is a list of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States that have been explicitly overruled, in part or in whole, by a subsequent decision of the Court. It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes.

    As of 2018, the Supreme Court had overruled more than 300 of its own cases.[1]

    • @Serinus
      link
      99 days ago

      It’s nuance that doesn’t matter.

      The fact is that this Supreme Court is a joke, and why should anyone respect it in any way?

      He is the one who destroyed the credibility of the court. The precedent that the SC has set is that precedent doesn’t matter. The judge should do what he thinks is fair. He shouldn’t be bound by rules that very clearly don’t bind anyone else, including the fifth district court.

    • @wjrii
      link
      English
      39 days ago

      Yeah, as deliciously ironic as it is that it was Thomas who was tasked with this, lower courts are supposed to rule based on precedent, and if anybody is going to overturn that precedent, it needs to be SCOTUS. Now, back in the day that would be done to overturn bullshit like Dred Scott v Sandford or Pace v Alabama once people finally got their heads far enough out of their assholes.

      This court? Not so much.

  • @kemsat
    link
    119 days ago

    Leopard’s case?

  • @mx_smith
    link
    79 days ago

    Fucking Handkerchief head