Summary

Progressive Democrats accused Donald Trump and Elon Musk of orchestrating a “constitutional crisis” after Musk moved to shut down USAID and gained access to a federal payment system.

Lawmakers, blocked from entering USAID’s headquarters, condemned Trump for granting Musk unchecked power over government functions.

Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that Musk’s involvement could trigger financial instability, while Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called it a “plutocratic coup.”

  • @Freefall
    link
    83 hours ago

    Blame is a weird way to say “point out”

    • @WrenFeathers
      link
      12 hours ago

      Was trying to think of a way to say this exact thing! Astute!

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    226 hours ago

    what the hell is wrong with this comment section. The problem here is not the democrats. Fixing he democrats is not going to improve republican shenanigans. Shouting for the minority democrats to do something is like shouting for the green party to do something. The problem is in this idea to blame the good for not being perfect and ignoring that people are fine letting in the bad. My prediction is every one of the the super leftists looking for things to get bad enough for “the revolution” to happen will be seig heiling like their is no tomorrow when the boots hit the neck.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 hours ago

      The democrats are refusing to employ any of the government-breaking strategies the republicans just proved, over years as a minority party, can bring the government to crawl. Worse than that, they are enabling everything the republicans are doing. They aren’t even putting up a fight. They’d rather be “civil” and “the adults in the room” than actually stop fascism. They are controlled opposition.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        -24 hours ago

        I get the first picture but the second? We know democrats do not vote lockstep and we have pretty traitorous members like fettermen are among them. I see 37 voting correctly. This is one thing about when they are in power. People expect them to vote in lockstep like the republicans but that has never been the case.

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          73 hours ago

          I get the first picture but the second? We know democrats do not vote lockstep

          They expect democratic voters to.

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            -53 hours ago

            not really. they expect folks to choose better in the choice of better or worse.

              • HubertManne
                link
                fedilink
                -43 hours ago

                mine do. I can effect the election of two senators and one representative.

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  63 hours ago

                  No, I mean that when Democratic legislators are presented with a choice of better or worse, just enough of them always choose worse, but expect greater loyalty from the voters.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 hours ago

          So, you’re essentially saying this is normal for democrats? It’s normal for them to go to bat for republicans? How is that a defense?

          It never ceases to amaze me how hard people go in making excuses for democrats.

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            03 hours ago

            no its more that some democrats are not very much of ones. usually in swing states. I actually agree they should not vote for canidates based on electability but that is a problem with the electorate of the state with the primaries. But yeah democratic canidates in red states can be very conservative but repbulican canidates in blue states will still be very conservative. which is why you don’t want to be voting for them at any level no matter what bs they spew because they will always toe the line which has mostly meant get rid of regulations and lower taxes on the wealthy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 hours ago

              That’s just a No True Scotsman. “The subset of democrats who vote in line with Republicans, thus making all other democrats’ resistance moot, are simply not real democrats”

              • HubertManne
                link
                fedilink
                13 hours ago

                Not really. Its the reality of a republic. I can’t vote for democrats outside of the ones who represent me. I am good with their voting records. I cannot effect who gets voted into other states but I can see the history. I am also good with the democratic presidential canidates like biden over trump or kamala over trump. so I vote that way with them. I would encourage people in other states to vote for better democratic canidates as better repbulican ones will 100% vote lockstep with the party no matter what they say while the democrat may do what they said they would. I honestly don’t know what those democrats campaigned on.

  • @Bosht
    link
    English
    61
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Why the fuck is it only ‘the progressives’ that are saying it? This makes it seem like it’s a political issue and not a hostile takeover. Fucking ridiculous.

    • @P00ptart
      link
      129 hours ago

      God damn it lol my dumbass just looked up “orogressive” instead of realizing it was a typo.

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        54 hours ago

        I dumped that into ChatGPT to figure out what that would mean:

        “Gold-progressing”: If “oro-” means gold, then “orogressive” could describe something advancing toward wealth, golden standards, or prosperity.

        “Mountain-moving” or “Mountain-progressing”: If we go with the geological meaning, “orogressive” could mean progressing through or overcoming mountains—maybe symbolizing overcoming big challenges.

        “Speech-advancing”: If “oro-” is tied to oral communication, “orogressive” might mean someone who is progressive in speech, rhetoric, or persuasion.

        Honestly, all of those are ironically far more aspirational than “progressive”. I give it 4/5 stars for your newly-minted neologism.

      • @Bosht
        link
        English
        16 hours ago

        Haha, sorry man. Thanks for pointing out the typo!

        • @P00ptart
          link
          16 hours ago

          That wasn’t really the intention there lol, but no problem.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      18 hours ago

      The liberals are just speechless with how beautifully the system is being exploited.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    459 hours ago

    Please, Progressive Democrats, try to make a new progressive party. Cut ties with the Democrats.

    Bipartisan succ.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      116 hours ago

      Problem is that if the DNC splits, both parties will be even weaker than they are now

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        23 hours ago

        The Democrats don’t have to field a candidate if they’re that worried about splitting the vote.

        It’s not like they try to win anyway.

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        34 hours ago

        A valid concern.

        I strongly recommend looking at what the Polish did. We can have multiple movements all trying to influence outcomes. They don’t even need their own candidates, they just have to endorse ones that party elsewhere or have a chance of being picked up by a major coalition (e.g. Sanders, AOC). Over time, that movement gains traction and notoriety, further influencing elections.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Initiative

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 hours ago

        Yeah, but that won’t last forever. Give progressive dems a chance to campaign in earnest for their platform, without the chains of establishment pro-corporate policies around their necks, and you might be surprised how quickly the 90-million non-voters come around.

        • @dejected_warp_core
          link
          14 hours ago

          you might be surprised how quickly the 90-million non-voters come around.

          Good. I’d rather know what the score is with the actual, entire, electorate than left to yet another situation where a huge number of people just stood by.

    • @DarkCloud
      link
      77 hours ago

      I’m not from America, so I don’t really get why you’re not all forming militias into battalions and organizating command structures and overt/covert lines of communication and national plans.

      A counter coup if you will. Aka trying to find a majority based path to a bloodless civil war. Ideally a series of stand offs where fed forces have been prearranged to stand down.

      Of course if that fails Trump would declare marshall law which is part of his agenda as it legitimizes the executive having more power so…

      Death by 1000 grifters I guess is the alternative.

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        4
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Not sure where you’re from, but we have some problems that stand in the way of coordinating any kind of resistance. At least, not proactively.

        In short: we have no living memory of domestic war, famine, epidemic, or wholesale financial hardship lasting longer than a few years. We’ve had tastes of those things, but they always effect people disproportionately, usually along class lines. So being proactive by taking up arms, or preparing for economic catastrophe, is literally unthinkable for most.

        Meanwhile, the usual kind of political corruption that we’re accustomed to just came to an end, and is changing shape before our very eyes. Nobody knows what to do with that, yet.

      • TimmyDeanSausage
        link
        24 hours ago

        Most of us are in denial. You probably would be too if it was your way of living and life on the line. Most people aren’t mentally prepared for shit to get that kind of real…

  • @Crazyslinkz
    link
    6610 hours ago

    Isn’t it obvious that this administration is a government for the wealthy?

    Americans are so out of touch… remember that some people that voted didn’t even know Biden dropped out.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 hours ago

      everyone’s just sat around looking at thirst traps on instagram

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 hours ago

        I watch an ungodly amount of porn and still manage to do some basic keeping up on politics. The problem isn’t the other things people want to do, it’s that being up-to-date on politics is straight up a faux pas. Everyone can agree that our current government sucks, but start trying to tell the vast majority of people about anything specific, such as, I dunno, how Mitch McConnell stole Supreme Court appointments from Obama, their eyes glaze over. People think it’s cool to bitch about your own problems, but if you learn enough to do anything about it and advocate for political action, you become a tryhard.

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          but do you get your news from porn or from social media? because a disturbingly high proportion of the population gets their news almost exclusively through facebook, instagram, twitter, and reddit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 hours ago

          their eyes glaze over.

          As someone who’s eyes glaze over, what should I be doing? I can’t vote McConnell out. I have a job and responsibilities to deal with just keeping myself alive so I can’t travel around protesting. I vote but my vote gets drowned out by the overwhelming majority of Republicans surrounding me. It’s overwhelming to think about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 hours ago

      Since 2016: “Trump will be the end of democracy!”

      After election: Hands over the reigns without a fight

    • @P1k1e
      link
      128 hours ago

      “No you!”

      -Nancy Pelosi or some shit

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    3910 hours ago

    Meanwhile all the Dems in leadership positions are conspicuously silent.

    We cant afford to keep letting geriatric procorp moderates be the only alternative to fascism.

    We just saw it the last four years, even when we “win” things don’t get better, they just stop getting worse for a few years.

    It’s never been sustainable, and we’ve wasted decades on “the lesser evil”.

    We need to actually run a good candidate Dem voters already agree with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I think it might take something more drastic to deal with the actual Nazis running the country now. They are gaining more control over people’s lives and speech every day, and they have stated their intention to keep Trump as leader for at least another term after this one, and to do away with elections. Running appealing candidates may no longer be enough to topple them.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        78 hours ago

        I think it might take something more drastic to deal

        Gets truer everyday as long as we the only other option is neoliberalism and “the lesser evil”.

  • @assembly
    link
    18 hours ago

    Progressive Democrats accuse ocean of containing water.

  • Verdant Banana
    link
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    progressive democrats are oxymorons