• enkers
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    There’s actually a whole class of these words. They’re called heterological words.

    Their opposite, autological (or homological) words are words that do describe themselves. “Autological” is an autological word because it describes itself.

    Here’s a fun question, though: is “heterological” a heterological word? If you say yes, then that means it does not describe itself and therefore it is not heterological. If you say no, then it does describe itself therefore it is heterological. Bit of a head scratcher.

    This is the Grelling-Nelson paradox.

    • @pyre
      link
      43 hours ago

      the new administration has banned the use of homological words so be careful.

    • @ewigkaiwelo
      link
      23 hours ago

      Isn’t there a mistake in your first statement about the word heterological? If I say yes the word heterological is heterological it means that it doesn’t fall into the class of words that it describes and so it is heterological, because as you’ve defined heterological words do not describe themselves

      Here’s a fun question, though: is “heterological” a heterological word? If you say yes, then that means it does not describe itself and therefore it is not heterological.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        You’re correct! I had an extra not in there. Good catch.

        • @ewigkaiwelo
          link
          119 minutes ago

          I was actually referring to the other “not” that was at the end, but it only shows why it is paradoxical and how confusing nature of predication is in languages, as in this question appears to be a case of Russell’s paradox of sets

    • @jaybone
      link
      24 hours ago

      You’re the substitute teacher who wouldn’t let us play Heads Up Seven Up.

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      My favorite homological word:

      Sesquipedalian.

      An unnecessarily long word, or a person who uses unnecessarily long words.

      Sesquipedalian is a sesquipedalian word.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        21 hour ago

        Oooh, that’s a good one! Its use also makes its user described by itself. Neat!

  • @Pregnenolone
    link
    English
    46 hours ago

    The hyphen has long been killed by the Internet. It suffered a worse fate than “literally”; it faded into nothingness without even so much as a “where is it?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 hours ago

      This seems to apply to a number of speech impediments, as “rhotacism” is the term for people with difficulty saying R sounds and apparently “stutter” is a particularly difficult word for people with stutters.

    • metaStatic
      link
      fedilink
      128 hours ago

      Same person who named the fear of long words Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia

      • *Tagger*
        link
        88 hours ago

        And who spelt dyslexia like that

  • Annoyed_🦀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    !hyphenated.

    Edit: lol my intention isn’t to link a community but to replicate the “Not” statement like in coding.

    • @Whelks_chance
      link
      15 hours ago

      Important hyphenated.

      CSS is a strange language too

      • @AnUnusualRelic
        link
        English
        14 hours ago

        That’s one of the syntax usages that irritates me the most in any language.

  • @lemmus
    link
    59 hours ago

    Unhyphenated. Also, nonhyphenated is correct in multiple style manuals.

    • @pyre
      link
      13 hours ago

      hyphenated words are on their way out. not much use for the hyphen in most cases.