• @Kyrgizion
    link
    English
    661 month ago

    If it escapes under Trump’s leadership can we call it the trump virus? Please?

  • teft
    link
    English
    371 month ago

    The constant edging with bird flu mania is going to make people not pay attention when it actually pops off.

    • @straightjorkin
      link
      English
      311 month ago

      The problem is that the CDC isn’t getting to say anything right now, so we can assume that the moment they get to talk about it, the stupidest people you know are going to go “woah this was really sudden! They clearly made it in a lab!”

      • teft
        link
        English
        121 month ago

        That’s actually a really good counter point that I hadn’t thought of.

        • @straightjorkin
          link
          English
          171 month ago

          Thank you, I’ve spent a lot of time giving myself brain damage so I can understand the perspective of conservatives.

          • @T00l_shed
            link
            English
            51 month ago

            Huff a lot of glue or paint, maybe ram a crayon or two in your brain. Then you might get close to understanding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is it popping off. We’ve already lost a huge portion of chickens in the US. We’re seeing dozens of cases in humans. And it’s in cows too. The only reason it doesn’t feel like a big deal is because we as a nation aren’t doing anything about it yet, only individual farms are. Same way COVID went from “is this a big deal?” to “oh fuck shut everything down”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        The big event will be someone with regular human flu getting bird flu, giving the virus opportunities to swap DNA segments. If it gets the transmissibility of our standard influenza and the lethality of bird flu, it’ll be a rough six months to a year before we have vaccines for it as it rips through our population.

        Especially considering flu vaccines are made with eggs, and this disease is currently thoroughly decimating our egg producing livestock.

        • @Ultraviolet
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          The lethality is 52%. If it rips through the population, we’re looking at total collapse well before the vaccine is available.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Highly dependent on the degree to which it’s contagious. But you’re right, especially considering we’re looking at one of the worst flu seasons in more than a decade currently. If all flu cases were 50% lethal that’d be 10-15 million deaths.

    • Catma
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      If we just stop testing it will go away like magic. Did you learn nothing from Covid?

    • @seven_phone
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      The little boy who called bird flu, but I think the call here is that it is difficult to feel safe behind the idea that it does not cross the species barrier when you have bird flu in cows.

      • teft
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Unfortunately people will just think “Hey I’ve seen this bird flu in the news and it didn’t seem bad.” Then they ignore all virologist recommendations and we have a second pandemic.

        • @seven_phone
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          Too little information is as bad as too much, it is a difficult balance. The problem with information dissemination last time was not oversaturation but that people latched onto ridiculous conspiracy narratives and that derives from lack of basic education not too much news.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      When would you like to be alarmed? For me it was when it jumped to mammals.

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      And this time there will be zero investment in stopping it spreading when it starts killing people

  • Singletona082
    link
    English
    351 month ago

    Corona 2 electric boogaloo here we come!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        in the beginning yes, but as the virus mutates, the variant that spreads quicker will also be less deadly. like with covid too. not that it isn’t dangerous now, but it was far deadlier in the early stages.

        • @jimmy90
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          in a country that could start acting against this virus right now with RNA vaccine research has probably closed down all those facilities

  • @Snapz
    link
    English
    341 month ago

    No coincidences, trump will always bring disease and ruin. You keep welcoming the fox back into the henhouse, America.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      Between this and Gaza (and everything else), I really honestly don’t think we have seen a person in all of human history who checks more boxes of being the antichrist.

      Like fuck, he literally brings pestilence and disease with him.

  • AnimalsDream
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    If we could get enough people to stop eating animal products at the same time, it would simultaneously lower their personal risks of infection, the risks of another pandemic, and it could hit the animal ag industries hard - who are some of the largest funders of the gop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      I love the enthusiasm but the movement would immediately be labelled as woke and a lot of people would start eating more animals just to “own the libs”

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        The people who would do that would be putting themselves at greater risk when the next pandemic does break out. That’s their problem - especially if they’ve been informed on everything they can do to help and protect themselves.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 month ago

          That’s their problem

          Unfortunately, with how pandemics work, it would be everyone’s problem.

          • AnimalsDream
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            It already is, and they’re already speedrunning us into the next one. All the more reason to focus on protecting who we can, and who is willing to not be an active harm.

      • @surewhynotlem
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        Nah, we just need to lean into their toxic male fragility. Remind them it’s super gay to have some animal’s meat in their mouth. So juicy it slides right down your throat. Yeah, you enjoy that beef on your tongue, you slut?

        If we really pushed that message, Joe Rogan would be vegan within a week.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      In the last pandemic, we couldn’t get people to wear a mask sometimes without them losing their shit.

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        Should we have all stopped wearing masks because some people refused to? Should we all be anti-vacc because some people are?

        If you’re so constantly focused on your perceived enemies that you fill your time and mental energy with trying to tear them down, then yeah, you’re going to lose sight of what you’re reaching for in the first place. Change yourself first, and as you live by your own word, your example in and of itself has at least some automatic impact on changing others - even if those changes are gradual and take time.

        Don’t lose sight of the fact that even a single person changing their diet will have less risk of death because of that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      030 days ago

      The worst thing the left could do is go after people’s meat.

      Set environmental targets and cruelty laws, but get out of here with associating the left with veganism.

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        029 days ago

        Really? Cause if nothing else, every dollar you spend on animal products may as well be a direct donation to the republican party. And environmental targets? Good luck with that if you support meat and dairy.

        Sorry, but animal consumption and commodification is so thoroughly embedded in the conservative identity, that if you’re going to be anti-vegan, you may as well start wearing this shirt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Lol, I’ll add that to my list of things I need to be on the “left.”

          How you going to lead the revolution without guns and protein? Fuck workers interests and owning the means of production, we should be concerned about their diets!

          Capitalists will sell you meat if you want meat and vegetables if you want vegetables, one is certainly more green, but not more left.

          • AnimalsDream
            link
            fedilink
            English
            129 days ago

            It sounds like you can’t really imagine a world where there exists more than two kinds of people. Also saying you can’t get protein on plants in 2025? Maybe before wasting your time on pointless debates, you should spend even a modicum of time getting basic facts right.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              I mean you’re the one who can’t imagine a person on the left not being vegan. Who can’t imagine more than two kinds of people in this conversation? Are you going to form a workers movement with those very same working conservatives you are upset with by telling them about how their cooperation in a union benefits themselves and everyone, or about a moral crusade about the animals?

              Like sure we gotta cut down on animal products for environmental reasons, but that’s not veganism, that’s practical environmentalism. There’s no moral argument there. But to be frank, I and most other people do not care at all about the morality of eating animals, and will not be convinced to care, ever. An economy without animal products is not something most people ever aspire to obtain.

  • @SolidShake
    link
    English
    221 month ago

    The mask thing is going to be so funny again… I guess … ughhhhhhhhhhhh. Subscribe to the WHO if you haven’t already

    • guldukat
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      I’d be more than willing to build special warehouses for the unvaccinated manned by doctors and midwives with tons of knowledge about holistic medicine and essential oils, get them out of real hospitals

  • GhostOnTheHalfShell
    link
    fedilink
    128 days ago

    @ploot

    It’s a matter of time before some variant mutate and enable fall on human human transmission. When was the Spanish flu pandemic… 1918

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Yes, and I’ve heard people say “It’ll be OK; the strain that goes pandemic won’t be as lethal as the current strains.” There’s some truth in this, that extremely deadly viruses will tend to burn themselves out by killing their hosts so not spread so widely. So perhaps bird flu transmitted from person to person would not sustain the extremely high death rates this type of flu has shown in people in the past. But as the 1918 flu and even the COVID pandemic show, there’s a lot of wiggle room for a virus between utterly deadly and utterly harmless, and even something that’s far from the worst can still go pandemic and cause huge amounts of death, disruption and misery.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -181 month ago

    Maybe I’m late to the party, but do you think that the actual plan might be to kill as many of us as possible to weaken any potential uprising?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ah, the classic baseless dummy conspiracy theory of governments murdering own people for a reason or another.

      Edit: typo it -> or

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Oh man, my comment wasn’t totally serious but totally based on fear. I guess that’s exactly how conspiracies start. If my rhetorical-turned-accidental-theory turns out to be right, I’m gonna be super-bummed.

    • Dark Arc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it’s human nature to “look for a reason” but … these engineered virus narratives have never set well with me. It implies that the only way a pandemic could happen is if some person created it; that’s incredibly self indulgent, “the only way man could die to nature is if man invented nature.”

      Viruses just happen; we’ve had a reprieve from major plagues and things and have been unusually healthy because vaccines and other advances in medicine allowed us to save many that would have otherwise died.

      The only parts humans are playing in our current health crises are: A) Increasing the number of unvaccinated people giving viruses once nearly killed off room to play again B) Increasing the temperature of the planet which has been demonstrated to increase mutation rates and may release lost viruses trapped in ice and permafrost C) Cutting down large swaths of the Amazon rainforests which may also harbor lost viruses

      In all cases, we’re not creating the problem directly, we’re just giving the advantage back to nature that research from recent centuries gave to us.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Shit, I didn’t mean to make it sound like I thought this virus was manufactured. Why would anyone need to manufacture a disease when you can just leave a brain-worm rapist to dismantle every safeguard until measles becomes an active issue again.

    • AnimalsDream
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      I read somewhere that the previous Trump administration did make some policy decisions based on the belief that those on the left would be disproportionately impacted by covid. But do not underestimate how inept and incompetent Trump is also.

      Make an effort to be healthy, and keep updated with flu vaccines. Moderna recently received funding for developing h5n1 vaccines, so keep an eye on that. And don’t wait - you never know what stupid things Trump might do to suppress vaccine access.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/republicans-died-double-democrats-covid-b2227425.html

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      ah yes, uprisings famously never happen after many people died. They only ever happen when the population is prospering.

      • @straightjorkin
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        It’s only takes 3% of the population who want to actively over throw a government for it to happen. And if you reduce the population, it makes it easier to get to 3%

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t mean weaken like that. I mean thinning out potential armies. Like, literally reducing numbers.

        I was speaking out my ass and it was essentially some NWO bullshit. Then again, every accusation a confession…

    • @straightjorkin
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Who’s plan? The ketamine addicts or the pants shitter?

      They aren’t smart enough to develop a disease, but they are stupid enough to think that if they don’t do anything about it, no one will notice (don’t test for covid and the numbers will go down)

    • GladiusB
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      You make more for them alive then dead.