• archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Perhaps because he doesn’t seem to think there will be a need for a 2028 presidential race. Did he not say “you won’t need to vote anymore” to his supporters after the 2024 election?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      5 months ago

      yes. yes he did. that either means he’s establishing himself as dicktator for life, or he’s gonna fuck up the country so much there won’t be a government to elect in 2028. his actions thus far, it’s hard to tell which way he’s aiming that malformed 'shroom of his.

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just a correction, he didn’t say this after, he literally said it a few days before the election… :(

  • Lost_My_Mind
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trump cannot fathom a world where he’s not the center. So to him, the 2028 election doesn’t exist. It doesn’t dawn on him that the republican party will NEVER stand in the way of the 2 term limit, for one important reason. If they ever lose, they may never win again. Imagine if Obama had been allowed to run for a 3rd term. We’d be on his 6th term right now.

    So republicans don’t want to risk that.

    It’s like being 4th and 9. You punt. Unless you’re close enough for a field goal. But you don’t run a play and risk losing everything.

    • kobra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      republicans have thus far been willing to risk literally the entire constitution/democratic process, but term limits for president would be the line they don’t cross?

      • Lost_My_Mind
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because its the one that has consequences.

        If they kill democracy, or kill the constitution, that just means THEY’RE in charge.

        But if they go against term limits, there is no more inevitable back and forth. There could be a time where the democrats gain power, and without term limits, never give it up.

        Whereas this way, they continue to make slow progress thats never interupted. They don’t want to risk that.

    • Windex007
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the SC allows for a 3rd term as an option, it’ll be Trump v Obama 2028.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        To quote (Barack) Obama when he was asked in '14 or '15 about hypothetically running for reelection again if it somehow became legal, “Michelle would kill [him]”

        She’s done with the whole political pageantry bullshit, if her absences from hollow political theatre events like the Trump inauguration are any indication.

        Good for her, I say.

      • LengAwaits
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Unfortunately, the legislative policy that’s being floated in the House is that a president can seek a third term only if their first two terms were non-consecutive. (Source)

        • Windex007
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah yes. The “I’m too scared to run against Obama” clause

          • LengAwaits
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Absolutely! Thankfully. Just tipping their hand with regards to the ridiculous bullshit they’ll try use to prevent a Trump vs Obama situation.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We also said overturning Roe V Wade had no chance of passing. We also said “the president is immune to all crimes” had no chance of passing. We also said many other things they’ve passed had no chance.

            I’m not holding my breath.

            • bitchkat
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Roe vs Wade was never codified in law let alone the constitution.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              None of these things happened in congress. If there’s one thing we can still depend on it’s congressional inaction.

          • LengAwaits
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You are technically correct, which is the best kind of correct!

            I should have been more precise.

  • Red_October
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well he tried to get his last VP killed, so this is on brand for him already.

      • P1k1e
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably gonna amend the constitution to let Elon pull a Putin. Or just not and do it anyway

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can see him rallying his cult to defend him if anyone, including the GOP, tries to get him to step down. He’s done it before. But this time, he’ll have far more power.

  • Treczoks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    Of course. For Trump, presidency goes to the highest bidder. Musk just outbid Vance, that’s all.

      • werefreeatlastBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        For a few billion, what couldn’t you sell? C’mon 6 billion and 200 horses! He’ll write your name in the sky with spy satellites.

      • bitchkat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I firmly exoect Trump to sell Elon birthright citizenship. He bought his founder title at Tesla as well.

        • Raiderkev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Dumb piece of paper called the constitution. Don’t worry, we won’t have to worry about it in 4 years.

            • werefreeatlastBanned
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              OK, 6 billion, 200 cattle, the finest herd with hardly any covid, name in the sky and 10 virgins from south Africa!

              • werefreeatlastBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                A free personalized tezla with automatic satellite navigation!

      • Treczoks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Once Trump sees the amount of money Musk will offer to buy him out, I don’t see any hindrances.

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Welp, you heard the news JD. There’s only one way for you to become president…so get to work. I mean as long as you say its an official act you can do the deed yourself and aparently its totally legal.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.worksBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    The political theater never disappoints. Trump’s coyness about Vance’s 2028 ambitions is peak performative ambiguity—classic distraction from the fact that nobody actually believes in succession plans anymore. It’s all just ego preservation wrapped in faux meritocracy.

    Vance playing diplomat in Europe while simultaneously quarterbacking TikTok’s survival is a masterclass in cognitive dissonance. Saving a social media app while negotiating global conflicts? Only in a world where geopolitical strategy is outsourced to Silicon Valley’s dopamine factories.

    The real punchline? TikTok thanking Trump for its resurrection. A Chinese-owned platform crediting an American populist for its survival—irony so thick you could carve it with a propaganda knife. The circus is in town, and the clowns are writing the rules.

  • Windex007
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Things have changed a lot since '14.

    Like “on the one hand it’s a hassle having your husband be president”

    “… Buton the other hand… I want my daughters to have rights…”

    • Twentytwodividedby7
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s the oldest president in our history and eats McDonald’s frequently…

  • Geobloke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trump works for what ever makes trump look good. He will eventually fire Musk. Are there odds on musk making it the full 4 years? Remember he was also in the first administration, but got out.

    No, Trumps successor will be family. Or maybe Kushner