• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Canada might need these sooner rather than later.

    With the breakdown of democracy and the rule of law in America, the Constitution just became wholly unenforceable and therefore irrelevant. That means that Trump could make good on his fever dream of invading Canada.

    And there are many Americans who would jump at the chance to obey his command to slaughter Canadians. With only 40M against America’s 334M - and 0.097M military personnel against America’s 2.1M - it would be absolutely no contest.

    Our only way of making such a fascist act of aggression as painful as possible would be with asymmetrical warfare using tiny, hard-to-defeat drones that could act independently and strike without warning. Deploy 10k of these suckers onto a battlefield, and the only survivors would be those within sealed armour or flying at high altitude. Because even an A10 Warthog loitering low over the field can be taken out if it unexpectedly ingests a half-dozen of the explosive buggers.

    • @Fandangalo
      link
      English
      433 days ago

      Surveillance drones everywhere.

    • @Thrashy
      link
      English
      93 days ago

      I’ve low-key started to think the only reason we haven’t seen autonomous hunter-killer drones yet is that nobody’s willing to break the seal, and I’m scared for what happens when somebody finally does.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        203 days ago

        My dear stranger, those already exist, and have been used in war to terminate key individuals.

        We are living the dream.

        • @Thrashy
          link
          English
          83 days ago

          Point me towards systems that don’t have a human in the loop, particularly any that utilize fully-autonomous swarms, and I’ll agree. Scary as the former are, there’s a world of difference between a handful of FPV suicide drones, and a cloud of HL2-Manhack-esque things operating on face-recogniton-guided autopilot.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            83 days ago

            Oh, that’s what you mean… yeah, there are humans behind, but potato potato, swap one brain for another… anyway it is a killing machine that can get you anywhere in the planet.

            • mosiacmango
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              The humans are using ai to pick the targets they kill anyway. They theoretically are supposed to parse out the bad targets, but we know from examples listed in the above, that for genocidal states like Israel, that review is intentionally ignored or minimized.

      • Erasmus
        link
        English
        53 days ago

        Horizon Zero Dawn looking more eminent any day now.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        They are definitely super willing to break the seal, just nobody has built a good target ID system yet that won’t fire on civilians.

        If you just need everyone in a 10 mile radius dead, you could send in the hunter bots, or you could just shell the area with heavy artillery from three countries away. We already have that problem solved. Once we have a reliable target ID system I guarantee you’ll start seeing unmanned equipment in war.

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      23 days ago

      And it sucks, when you think inside Star Wars, such small drones are used only in medical or expensive surveillance and military applications.

      But in real life it can really be a swarm of things worse than scarabs in The Mummy.

    • @Docus
      link
      English
      13 days ago

      There is no way these things could spread poison instead of pollen is there?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Dear technology under capitalism… We just want healthcare, housing, etc… We don’t fucking need swarms of robot insects.

  • @Doorbook
    link
    English
    49
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In the latest video about this by veritasium, he asked the researcher about ethics concern. the researcher insist that they dont care as humanity can decide for itself.

    Meanwhile:

    The new report also details the extent of MIT’s partnerships with Israeli military contractors like Elbit Systems, which supplies 85 percent of Israel’s killer drones, and Maersk, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, that has sent millions of pounds of military goods to Israel since the start of the war on Gaza. The Israeli military also sponsored several of the MIT projects with funds provided by the U.S. Defense Department.

    https://theintercept.com/2025/01/16/mit-israel-military-funding-research-gaza/

    • @shoo
      link
      English
      133 days ago

      That researcher is a real life Dr. Hoenikker. Vonnegut is probably shrugging in his grave

      • Sam, The Man
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        -…his mother was completely consumed by robotic bees. So it goes.

    • @remer
      link
      English
      93 days ago

      “We are willing to ignore and downplay the ethical concerns as long as the money keeping coming in”

  • Mister Neon
    link
    English
    463 days ago

    I’d rather just have bees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      But how can techbros get rich from bees? Bees just make themselves for free then serve the greater good, the little buzzing communists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        oh so you think birds aren’t already flying robots? robot bees are just the next step.

        /s obviously

      • @Cocodapuf
        link
        English
        43 days ago

        The MIT engineers agree. They said something to the effect of “If you could make a robotic bee, it wouldn’t replace bees. It would be a terrible idea to try to use them for pollination… Just put that same amount of finding into conservation and researching bees, you would have a much better result.”

    • @Dicska
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Fall into me

      And drown inside me

      I know you will see

      The beauty of me

      Also, I’ve seen this episode of Tom Scott.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    273 days ago

    The new technology could increase crop yields dramatically without harming the environment.

    That’s a surprisingly benign use case, I was expecting far worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 days ago

    Because developing a replacement for bees is certainly a better solution then saving the bees…

  • Zier
    link
    fedilink
    73 days ago

    It wont be long now before the nanobots exist and the Borg can finally take over. Resistance is futile.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 days ago

    How’s this for an obscure reference? This reminded me of an episode of Max Headroom in which the wunderkind Bryce invented a robotic fly with a spycam that could be used to literally bug a room. They send it on a mission to uncover an evil plot and everyone is excitedly crowded around the screen and heaping praise on it. Then it manages to sneak into the evil lair where it promptly gets swatted, leaving Bryce shocked and devastated.

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    12 days ago

    I think there was an X-Files episode about this.