President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, during a closed-door meeting on Wednesday, rejected an offer by the Trump administration to relinquish half of the country’s mineral resources in exchange for U.S. support, according to five people briefed on the proposal or with direct knowledge of the talks.

The unusual deal would have granted the United States a 50 percent interest in all of Ukraine’s mineral resources, including graphite, lithium and uranium, according to two European officials. Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury secretary, who presented the deal to Ukraine, said Sunday that the United States wanted the minerals “as payback for the aid we’ve given them” — leaving unclear whether the deal would cover future military and financial assistance.

A Ukrainian official and an energy expert briefed on the proposal said that the Trump administration sought not only Ukraine’s minerals but additional natural resources, including oil and gas. The proposal, they said, would entitle the United States to half of Ukraine’s resource earnings — funds that are today mostly invested in the country’s military and defense production.

MBFC

Archive

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1636 days ago

    The audacity of this mineral shakedown reeks of late-stage empire logic—strip-mine a nation’s future while dangling survival as a bargaining chip. Colonialism never died; it just outsourced its PR. Trump’s “deal” is pure extortion: surrender half your sovereignty or face abandonment. Zelensky’s refusal isn’t principled—it’s survival math. What’s 50% of ashes?

    Security guarantees? The U.S. wants a vassal, not an ally. Promising troops for rare earths after a peace deal is like selling fire extinguishers post-inferno. Ukraine’s minerals are the new blood diamonds, traded by suits in Munich while frontlines smolder.

    Watch how “democracy” becomes a euphemism for resource arbitrage. The real pandemic is geopolitical vampirism. Kyiv’s counteroffer? Probably another round of hollow treaties. But hey, at least the circus has fresh clowns: Vance and Rubio, scrambling to monetize a massacre.

    • @AlternatePersonMan
      link
      English
      526 days ago

      Good. Trump is a ventriloquist dummy for Putin. Even if he wasn’t, demanding a kid for half his lunch money to save him from a bully just makes you another bully.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 days ago

        Munich hosts the annual Security Conference, where power brokers gather to carve up geopolitical pies. Ukraine’s minerals are on the menu, served cold with a side of imperial ambition. The suits in Munich aren’t just sipping overpriced cocktails—they’re brokering deals that turn blood-soaked trenches into corporate spreadsheets.

        The connection? It’s where the U.S. pushed its extortionate mineral “deal” while Ukraine countered with demands for actual security guarantees. Munich isn’t just a city; it’s a stage for this theater of exploitation. If you’re missing the dots, it’s because the script is written in fine print only lobbyists can read.

        So, Munich matters because it’s where sovereignty gets auctioned off under the guise of diplomacy.

  • @2000mph
    link
    English
    726 days ago

    So now the US are officially running a protection racket! You really do have mob bosses running the place.

    • @Paddzr
      link
      English
      36 days ago

      It’s like that crude joke

      “Would you have sex with me for 1 million? Yes. How about for 20 instead? No, I’m not a whore! We already established that, we’re now negotiating the price”

      First it was the rare earth worth X amount, now it’s half. What’s next?

    • شاهد على إبادة
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      They have been doing it with Arab countries for decades. Pay up or get sanctioned, bombed, invaded and couped. What some in the West wrongly perceive as bribes are actually tributes to avoid becoming the next Iraq, Syria or Libya, or worse: Palestine.

      • @lurklurk
        link
        English
        56 days ago

        A defence alliance

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    996 days ago

    Good. Fuck em (us) the USA shouldn’t shake down Ukraine for minerals with the empty promise of security.

    Ukraine should join NATO and they all should rally to support Ukraine. USA isnt dependable currently. And should be treated as hostile.

    Take it from me… an american, the US government is absolutely hostile towards folks. :(

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 days ago

      NATO isnt an option anymore. Trump being president means the US will reject their NATO application.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        476 days ago

        Unless, of course, the US exits NATO. At this point, everybody would be better of without them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          296 days ago

          I believe that the us passed a law saying that a president can’t remove the USA from NATO… But gestures broadly we can see how much rule of law matters to a R government trifecta.

          Idk… either way… Ukraine needs support and if they don’t get it… the Russians will be at doorsteps to the major European countries. IMHO.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 days ago

            It doesn’t really matter what happens with nato, trump is technically commander in chief of the armed forces and just the chaos alone of the first few hours and days is where it makes all the difference. Jan 6 for example would have looked a whole lot different under a different sitting president where the national guard and military were sent in when they should have been, because as it was, disaster was minutes and tens of feet away that day.

      • Arghblarg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        186 days ago

        So kick US out of NATO. They can re-apply once they’re done with fascism.

      • @MrNesser
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Meh as long as it’s not in a treaty they can start the process and wait for trump to hit the burger king in the ground

        (I was going to say sky but we all know he ain’t going up)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 days ago

        Nato isn’t an option for anyone anymore. Europe needs to re-group and handle their own security. This includes weapon production. US is not a stable partner, and it’s finally starting to dawn on the Europeans

    • @MutilationWave
      link
      English
      46 days ago

      I have this terrible feeling that Turkey would veto, even if somehow we could distract Trump with enough McDonald’s and fake tits to try to get it done.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -126 days ago

      As a US citizen, it’s never been hostile towards me. In fact, I would imagine most people have had little to no engagement with the federal government (outside of the routine items: taxes, etc…) Now, their state government may be a different story.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    656 days ago

    What good is being saved from being enslaved by one dictator only to be enslaved by your “saviour” instead?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      Theoretically maybe the “savior” won’t shoot, maybe.

      Look, it’s not a good deal, but hey, I’m trying this optimism thing out. Don’t think it’s working.

      That said, anyone who makes a deal with Trump hasn’t paid attention to any of the deals he made in his last administration that he’ll drop them when they’re inconvenient.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    English
    616 days ago

    I think that, if Trump hadn’t decided to just sow chaos for the last three weeks, all of these deals he’s trying to make might actually end up with more favorable outcomes.

    How is anyone supposed to trust the US in good faith when they’re watching us destroy ourselves on purpose?

      • @hark
        link
        English
        156 days ago

        That works if you’re in a position of power and don’t need to rely on the people you’re reneging on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    616 days ago

    The offer might have gone over slightly better if the US Secretary of Defense hadn’t already ruled out NATO membership and a return to Ukraine’s 2014 borders.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 days ago

      I’d like to see Ukraine get Crimea back but it’s never going to happen. not without russias complete collapse at least

  • @WhatAmLemmy
    link
    English
    62
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Lol. The US is a fucking failed state that couldn’t even defeat Vietnamese, Afghan, or Iraqi peasants at the peak of their empire, with trillions of dollars in capital… Literally 1000x more capital than their enemy.

    Every country needs to grow balls, forge alliances, and tell the US to collectively get fucked. They’re swinging their dick around like they hold the cards, when they’re grossly incompetent, and without the rest of the world playing ball the US is fucking dead in the water. All of their wealth is worthless without the global supply chain. They will collapse in months without us.

    Even if Ukraine’s gov fell, it’s likely Russia would be locked in a guerrilla warfare quagmire (like Afghanistan in the 80’s). If the USSR couldn’t defeat a bunch of peasants, why would a state with 1/10th the power be able to defeat Ukraine?

    If the EU is smart — and not a bunch of capitalist oligarchies masquerading as “democracies” — they’ll offer asylum and jobs to US scientists, and brain drain the US of what little remaining leverage they have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 days ago

      Don’t know about the other countries,but Afghanistan is a bit special. Many invaders have tried, and failed. I guess the mountainous terrain doesn’t make it any easier. Seems to me that nobody is capable of conquering Afghanistan. When you hear about another empire trying their luck, you know it’s going to drain their power.

      • Skua
        link
        fedilink
        126 days ago

        Vietnam has historically been pretty brutal for invaders too. Between the end of the third Chinese domination and the start of the French colonial period, they went almost a thousand years rarely ever losing a war. They even fended the Mongols off

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 days ago

          Let me guess, it was the jungle. I recall from history class, that China is protected by a massive jungle on one side, which has kept potential invaders from trying that direction. Maybe the same is true for Vietnam as well.

          • Skua
            link
            fedilink
            76 days ago

            I assume it must have played a role. The Chinese border with Vietnam, Laos, and Myanmar has some pretty damn big mountains too, which is one of the other classic “invading through this sucks” features

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -26 days ago

          Yeah - the US was just unlucky. They lost these ones + the korean war. But anywhere else they would win. Maybe except in Russia. Or china. Or a few others. But except for that they would win

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 days ago

            The US was lucky that Afghanistan didn’t drain all of their money and power. It was already a total disaster, but it could have been even worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 days ago

      Well… the US could have won any of those wars, but only by completely wiping them off the map. And even the worst of the presidents wouldn’t have done that (the current one TBD).

    • @Webster
      link
      English
      26 days ago

      Would love Asylum. Scared for my daughter growing up in this country right now. Realistically we’d have a hard time taking it and leaving our families, but I told my wife anything is on the table if our daughter needs it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If the USSR couldn’t defeat a bunch of peasants

      What historical event are you referring to?

      If the EU is smart — and not a bunch of capitalist oligarchies masquerading as “democracies” —

      Finally it’s dawning on the average western progressive

  • @badbytes
    link
    English
    336 days ago

    Sorry Ukraine, that we elected a small handed baby, who is a terrible leader. Hopefully, things work out for you. Sincerely, U.S.A.

  • @IndustryStandard
    link
    English
    316 days ago

    Good. Crazy that people were cheering on this straight up extortion. Europe and America promised support to win the war. Now that Ukraine is deep in the sunk cost fallacy they start extorting them.

  • @Thrillhouse
    link
    English
    226 days ago

    And this is exactly why the fuck Trump is chasing Canada as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    we’ve decided that you lose, and have negotiated the terms of your surrender with this bully psychopath who is also having sex with your mother and i

  • @hark
    link
    English
    66 days ago

    US support was never out of the goodness of their hearts, there was always going to be a price to pay, but of course trump goes about it in the most hamfisted way possible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 days ago

      The US has always got the dollar-as-global-reserve-currency out of its military spending, which is a large part of how post second world war America accrued a huge portion of unearned global wealth. Trump, those that voted for him, and those that spent decades creating this situation for personal enrichment are rapidly hastening the end of this situation.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        16 days ago

        It’s not just the act of spending on the military, it’s about control which they get through the use of the military.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    English
    36 days ago

    I love going to the SanDiego area swap meets. There are at least 3 big ones… National city, El Cajon and Oceanside. There, many people come haggle and barter to get used or grade B products. Maybe Trump should start there?

    Anyone who has ever gone there knows that you don’t go for the jugular of your cash cow. If you’re a buyer, you wanna be a nice mosquito… Look around a few times to see what you wanna get, go elsewhere, and then come back. If you are selling, you don’t kill the mosquito, buy you know how much blood to give. As a buyer you find a thing you don’t want, which is similar to the thing you do want so you can trade down or somehow not show interest in the actual thing you want.

    Now the entire world knows that Trump is an idiot and wants 50% of all natural resources. It could have been 90% of all uranium for example. Bug nah, look, here are all my cards! Take a good look see!

    That’s Trump’s are of the deal and it’s ass. It doesn’t mater if he actually gets anything from it. Its ass. We lose, they lose, ruzzia wins. Maybe we should have a well trained Lego dealing kid to negotiate a better deal.

    • rigatti
      link
      English
      36 days ago

      Did the world already not know that Trump is an idiot?

  • @IndustryStandard
    link
    English
    46 days ago

    Good. Crazy that people were cheering on this straight up extortion. Europe and America promised support to win the war. Now that Ukraine is deep in the sunk cost fallacy they start extorting them.