Everything except making a store people wanted to use? Ethan Evans, who was previously Vice President of Prime Gaming at Amazon, has a short retrospective of trying to take on Steam.

  • Float
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 days ago

    I don’t think they tried releasing a compelling product.

  • @Broadfern
    link
    English
    1113 days ago

    Everything, including:

    • giving a shit about the customer and having them permanently own their own games, even DRM-free like GOG?

    • Not forcing online connectivity to access the library?

    • Not shoving ads and spyware into the rest of the Amazon platform?

    • Appealing ethically by paying all employees a living wage?

    • Prioritizing innovation in expanding native Linux compatibility?

    🤔

    • @Pregnenolone
      link
      English
      233 days ago

      Most of the games that Amazon give away are GOG codes lol

      • @Broadfern
        link
        English
        133 days ago

        Well wipe my ass backwards and call me biscuit; I have been informed today.

        • @criss_cross
          link
          English
          53 days ago

          Yeah I found that out too and have been cashing in

    • @RightHandOfIkaros
      link
      English
      173 days ago

      Steam doesn’t give customers permanent ownership of their games. Its extremely rare, but game licenses do occasionally get revoked on Steam.

      • missingno
        link
        fedilink
        133 days ago

        Which means that’s an area where they could’ve tried to set themselves apart from Steam.

        • @RightHandOfIkaros
          link
          English
          53 days ago

          Those are terms set by the games publishers, Steam and other platforms pass them on to the customer. The only platform big enough to strongarm publishers to not do that is Steam, but it would definitely make some publishers pull out of Steam completely.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      I just installed all the free games I got from Amazon before deleting my account and they’re all DRM free…

      • @Broadfern
        link
        English
        43 days ago

        Apologies, I should have added the sarcasm tag. /gen

        Case in point is that Amazon will try everything for profit except not be cunts

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 days ago

    Every single Amazon product is a half-arsed mess off things that barely function. They’re basically just a delivery company that charges a percentage of the package value now.

    • @Hugin
      link
      English
      217 hours ago

      They also charge storage fees to keep your products on their shelf in the warehouse.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      82 days ago

      Something like 70% of their net income comes from AWS that pretty much runs a huge portion of the internet.

    • @SamboT
      link
      English
      02 days ago

      This is why you never really trust anything from a lemmy comment kids.

  • ShadowRam
    link
    fedilink
    523 days ago

    No they didn’t.

    I never saw a simple program with a clean store front and no bullshit.

  • Harwood97
    link
    English
    683 days ago

    I didn’t even notice they tried to take on Steam.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ethan Evans desperately trying to keep his job as VP of Prime Gaming:

  • @andrewth09
    link
    English
    223 days ago

    Steam? Set your sights lower. Maybe try to beat GOG or the EA launcher.

      • @qbus
        link
        English
        32 days ago

        It’s basically like G-Force now for a selection of GOG and epic games

  • @steeznson
    link
    English
    82 days ago

    Their Luna product seems to be different to Steam. It’s a streaming platform like Playstation Now or the Google Stadia one that got shut down.

    The other games that they’ve got on there primarily seem to be DRM-free GOG codes, mixed with some for the Epic store. Maybe they meant they were taking on Steam by boosting their competitors?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 days ago

    Nobody is going to overtake steam without being better. Corporate suits are also too out of touch to even come close

    • Tarquinn2049
      link
      English
      153 days ago

      No publicly traded company can compete with a well run private company. Infinitely growing profits breaks everything. Never take a company public if you can help it. It may even be preferable to shutter it if that is the only other option. Having stupid amounts of money is cool and all, but it does nothing useful. Money is only a tool if you actually use it… a golden hammer sitting on a shelf does no one any good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah even apple is talking about potentially introducing ads into maps when their whole positioning of premium price has meant premium product and experience.

        But the pressure of continual stock increases means company has to keep chasing exponential growth as opposed to being content with sustainable growth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 days ago

      Nobody is going to overtake Steam even if they’re better. People don’t want to have multiple libraries to deal with so you see them brag about paying for games to have them on Steam even though the game has been free on other platforms… Sometimes they even have claimed them and will still spend money to have them on Steam.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 days ago

        Steam will stay great so long as they stay a private company. It’s the enshitification of going public and appeasing boardmembers and shareholders that ruin companies like Valve. I hope GabeN chooses a great successor when he decides to step down. Hoping for another 27 years of awesome.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You realize that the cut they’re taking ends up being used to pay for a yacht collection, right? They don’t need board members and shareholders to enrich the few at the expense of the many and to take anti diversity decisions…

          There’s nothing great about Valve at this point, they disrupted the status quo back in the day, came up on top and take advantage of their position, just like any other company, private or public, does in their position.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            They disrupted the status quo back in 2003 (2001?), then in 2009 they were doing Linux ports, then in ~2015 they were doing HTPC stuff (and also funding Linux graphic driver dev the entire time, Linux gaming in its current state would not exist without Valve), there was their Steam Machine experiment somewhere in there (it flopped but that doesn’t make it cost any less), then they were doing Steam Deck stuff. They’re still paying Linux graphic devs BTW.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 days ago

            What position are they taking advantage of? If they ask for a smaller cut than 30 percent they get botched at for being anti competitive and being too cheap to try and compete against. They ask for more than 30% and they’re price gouging. Sure, everyone who works there is happy and sleeps in piles of money, but they can’t do anything about it without turning into more of a monopoly. As it stands they at least blow money on potentially cool things in R&D like the steam controller, steam box, and Steam Deck.

            What do you actually want Gabe to do? He’s already far and wide the industry leader in employee compensation, and he can’t take a smaller cut without becoming a monopoly. Yeah, he could donate loads of money to charity, but his giant stack of cash also keeps his private company lush with funds to continue paying his employees if anything dire does happen, instead of doing like everyone else and laying off people.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -32 days ago

              You’re defending the owner of a yacht collection and saying his money is used to keep his business lush… Get real.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 days ago

                No no, you don’t understand!

                He’s one of the good billionaires!

                (/s for some of you, and for others perhaps you should reconsider why you feel the need to defend a billionaire, regardless of your opinion on video game platforms)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Tried everything except building a nice service that doesn’t get in the way and that works, without enshittification and monetisation everywhere.

  • @ISolox
    link
    English
    163 days ago

    Cloud streaming is not a replacement for steam.

  • CaptainBasculin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Beat the competition, then enshittify yourself while your customer base sticks with you is the strategy used in all Amazon products. Amazon is the last storefront I would want to sell games in the scale of Steam.