• FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    This is what voting the lesser evil for 40 years got us.

  • Jhex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    are you “there yet”, America?

    • captainlezbian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Republicans won’t be satisfied until Nurgal delivers us all to the gates of Erishkagel

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I thought living in the future meant we would all be super smart and know shit, not whatever the fuck this is.

    • NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Idiocracy wasn’t a movie, it was a documentary sent here from the future.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Thank you for your daily contribution to capitalist society. Unfortunately, your woke-style awareness of social dilemma is counter to the goals of:

      • Increased profit
      • Decreased labor costs
      • More regressive taxes
      • Less progressive taxes
      • Military domination
      • Economical domination
      • Cultural division
      • Decreased regulation
      • Decreased education

      You’ll have 15 social credits deducted and may participate in free speech once again starting at 12:00pm tomorrow. Be aware that your score is nearing levels that will prevent job occupation, social program participation, social media participation, sunlight exposure, and time spent with family. Should your score decrease further, you may be required to shop exclusively from Grade D consumption centers. Have a good day.

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I thought living in the future meant people would understand how to use computers.

      I was, uh, wrong.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think so, Tube Titties. There has been a lot of smart fucking politicians, and lots of solid fucking political movements.

        I think it’s money. Money has superseded democracy and rule of law. It’s literally the only thing that matters. That is the problem.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Well, see, there’s your problem right there. There is a distinction between what politics means and how it gets corrupted.

            Like, in ancient Rome they made a decree that anyone hitting someone has to pay a $50 fine on the spot (or the fucking correlate amount of Sestertians), and one rich fuck went around in his sedan slapping people in the streets and have his posse pay the victim and then move on to the next one.

            That’s hardly “politics”- that’s abuse and loopholing the law.

            There is such a thing as just law, just politics, democracy and basic fucking human decency, and we can have it.

            But rich fucks decided, what if we use our money to corrupt politics, so we can slap people in the face with impunity?

            That’s the problem. Money. Not politics itself.

            • acosmichippo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              that sounds fine in theory but you can’t extricate money from politics. even if you enacted a perfect finace reform for all govt officials, average people tend to vote on issues that affect their finances. It’s always going to be about money one way or the other.

              • AA5B
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 minutes ago

                You’re missing an important distinction ….

                The problem is money distorting politics to harm society or citizens in favor of a few

                Politics serving the needs of citizens, including their economic needs, is NOT

  • DupaCycki
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.

    Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.

    There’s something both worrying and funny about reading such obvious manipulation on the official CDC website.

    • NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Hey everybody, I’m pretty sure there are no studies out there that disprove taking vaccines gives you a giant dick.

      If you want a giant dick to please all the boys and girls out there, get a vaccine because it gives you a giant dick!

  • snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.

    Oh look, the bizzaro scientific method.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The claim that “vaccines do not make you actually super hot and cool” is not an evidenced-based claim because no one has actually ruled out that vaccinated people are cooler and actually better hangs.

      Equally valid statement

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unfortunately they are starting to exploit the biggest “weakness” in science. That theories are valid only because they have yet to be disproven. And that theories will change if new evidence is introduced to the contrary.

      They are now basically saying “well since you can’t prove it, there’s a chance” which is fundamentally correct at its base but it’s in extremely bad faith.

      They’re now basically forcing people to prove a negative, which is impossible as a means of forcing their views.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That theories are valid only because they have yet to be disproven.

        No, scientific theories are valid because they are overwhelmingly supported by evidence.

        While it is true that they can be changed or replaced by evidence that dos not fit the theory, they are not just speculation waiting to be disproven. The ‘biggest weakness’ you are describing is a complete misunderstanding of science.

        Your last sentence is correct, but also contradicts your first paragraph.

        • acosmichippo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          yes, when people colloquially say “theory” they usually mean “hypothesis”.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Prove me “crazy thing” wrong! No I don’t have to show evidence you have to show evidence against it.

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s so stupid. You can’t prove a negative. The people claiming vaccines cause autism need to show evidence for their claim, not the other way around.

    • WhatAmLemmy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Corruption is a cancer that destroys everything it touches.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Also normalized fascism but that’s kind of redundant

  • paraphrand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.

    What’s this talking in the third person bullshit?

    • shalafi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think you mean “passive voice”.

  • NOT_RICK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Was this page helpful?

    Can anyone find the “fuck no” button?

  • blattrules
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m pretty surprised it took rfk jr this long to force them to update it.

  • chosensilence@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    the CDC has been a captured entity for years. don’t list to them. follow WHO guidelines instead.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can someone explain the downvotes this guy is getting and why, please? Thank you.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I mean the “face masks don’t help stop the spread of Covid” was my exit ramp

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Look I am clearly out of the loop here.

          Has the CDC not been regulatory captured for years?

          Just trying to make sense of this here, I don’t know.

          • chosensilence@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            yes, it has. these people have not been paying attention lol. the CDC was making bad decisions the first Trump presidency due to political pressure. it literally started there, guys, sorry.

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Look since we’re involved in this discussion here, can somebody provide sources for either side? I mean I know my hunches, but I kind of try to rely on data, hard as that may be to come by these days.

              • chosensilence@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 hours ago

                i mean, do you not remember their decisions 5 years ago? not being snippy just saying you don’t need sources… you lived it. they abandoned medical reality to force people to go back to work earlier and to stop staying home. no other health organization was saying what they were lol. because they were a captured entity by the Biden administration who forced them to kill us lest the economy suffer.

                • tomiant@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  NO no no no no no, look, I’m 100% not being snippy, I don’t know. I suspect, and I expect, a few things to be true, which are only getting more blatantly confirmed by the day, so I actually don’t know, I just don’t want this place to turn into Reddit, I like to hear shit out on their own merits.

                  Which, to also be fair, you haven’t provided evidence for. I am inclined to agree with you, but I’m too old to base my reality on hunches.