• PunnyName
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Perhaps it’s a good idea not to have houses in flood plains…

    • HeyJoe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed, especially since there are probably plenty of better locations in NJ to have these houses rebuilt. With the rise of insurance costs this will save 1200 people the hassle of higher prices and the increased percentage of having to deal with a disaster. It sounds like a great idea to me.

  • Doug Holland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why do you add the quotes, OP? Is there a better ‘answer’ that New Jersey could feasibly offer?

    • grue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Depends on the cause of the flooding. If it’s failure to enforce limits on impervious surface of new construction, they need to fix that. If it’s climate change, they need to make policies that address the causes of climate change (e.g. zoning reform for walkability).

      That’s in addition to buying out the properties, not instead of, BTW.

      • TropicalDingdong
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        If it’s climate change, they need to make policies that address the causes of climate change (e.g. zoning reform for walkability)

        And how will that change coastal inundation?

        • grue
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If New Jersey acts but other entities don’t, the fight against climate change might fail. If nobody acts because they assume everybody else won’t, the fight will definitely fail.

          Therefore, your question is irrelevant and New Jersey must act.

  • cybervseas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    In a world of bad options, for a state government this might be the best of the worst.

  • AA5B
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t get either calling this dystopia or putting “answer” in quotes. This seems like a great example of a local town adapting to climate change. Many towns probably need to follow this example

  • rollerbang
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Now go and sue the person/entity that has approved construction in areas prone to flooding.

    • AA5B
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      New construction in floodplains justifiably gets outrage, but the reality is most of them have been there a long time. Most of them have had flood repairs that were less than the cost of replacing. It’s really not useful to look to the past and be judgmental about when they should have known to stop building there, or even stopped repairing there. But we clearly know now

      The specific example in the article was a 60 year old guy talking about his childhood home being bulldozed.

  • ekZepp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Coming soon on the Trump Show: "Floods are AI Antifa Oax and will be soon declared illegal "