• @HLMenckenFanOPM
    link
    English
    891 year ago

    This is blatantly unconstitutional.

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      1081 year ago

      That’s pretty much the Republican party at this point. Project 2025 either convinces you the Republicans are going to far and avoid them like the plague or it speaks to all your petty fears and hates convincing you that only the Republicans are the party for you.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade
        link
        fedilink
        621 year ago

        The real problem, in my experience, is the large number of people. from all over the political spectrum, who will say, “Oh, that’s not what the party wants, that’s not what the politicians will do, it’s just some people saying things.” and just like, NO THEY REALLY DO WANT TO LINE ME AND HALF THE PEOPLE I KNOW UP AGAINST THE WALL AND SHOOT US DEAD, really seriously truly they do.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          English
          281 year ago

          And even if they don’t it’s what they’ll try to do. I heard that exact statement about overturning roe for my entire life

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s “surely they won’t actually do those things…” to, “well, it’s still better than being a Democrat” then vote for them giddily.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        That’s pretty much the Republican party at this point.

        And then they use the very same taxpayer dollars they’re supposedly so concerned about to defend the inevitable lawsuits.

      • @RobertOwnageJunior
        link
        71 year ago

        In Germany we had the NPD (now we have AfD), in the USA ypu have the Republican Party!

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        The fact of the matter is that it’s been the Republican party for decades, at least. It’s just now, with donnie Bin Laden and those who now feel emboldened because of him, the mask is off.

        It’s now very difficult for the corporate bothsiderist “liberal media” to pretend otherwise - though they sure do continue to try…

    • @eran_morad
      link
      321 year ago

      Brought to you by the traitor cunts who want to install fucking trump as dictator.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is it? What would Thomas Clarence Clarence Thomas say? What about Sam Alito? Because that’s who they’ll be asking if it’s illegal or not.

      I once had a philosophy professor that said “The only black person in America that hates other black people is Thomas ClarenceClarence Thomas.” And, aside from the fact that Candace Owens exists, Clarence is one of the most far right…errr…injustices on the court.

    • @bluestribute
      link
      31 year ago

      Unless it’s being used to protect school shooters, why would Republicans care about the constitution?

    • @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Since when has the right ever (really) cared about that?

    • @ShadowGlider
      link
      01 year ago

      It somehow violates two seperate parts of the 1st amendment, which would be slightly impressive if it weren’t being used to kill people

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      sorry for texting here but idk if theres another way to dm, why am i banned from atheist memes (if you know why, not sure how ban logs work)

  • @foggy
    link
    561 year ago

    Wait wait, all pornographers??

    yes has a very successful history good luck let me know how it goes yes okay have a good evening thank you

  • mle
    link
    fedilink
    541 year ago

    This headline had me guessing wether it’s about the US or some middle east state

    • stevedidWHAT
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      It’s really just any conservative country that doesn’t believe in progress, change or reform. Just hateful people really. The good news is they’re reeeeeally easy to pick out so that’s nice at least

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Bill I really think it’s time we form a committee to discuss ways to punish people whose life circumstances aren’t described in the bible!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -71 year ago

      Bad headline, no one has actually outlawed these things it’s just a batshit crazy proposal from a far right think tank

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        It’s not really “batshit crazy” when there’s prominent figures in a major right-wing party who would enact the proposal in a heartbeat.

        • @mriguy
          link
          91 year ago

          The fact that some right wingers want to enact it doesn’t make it any less batshit crazy. It means that they, too, are batshit crazy.

      • @PostmodernPythia
        link
        91 year ago

        Once, people on the internet thought I was crazy for thinking Roe v. Wade would be overturned. And all the laws ALEC got passed were once just “crazy proposals from a far right think tank.” If we underestimatr the right, they win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        That title made perfect sense to me, the term “vision board” describes everything in your comment

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not “far-right” if all conservatives are voting for this shit. These people aren’t “the fringes” of their party. They are their party.

    Conservatives are vile sub-humans who seek to oppress and harm the vulnerable. They genuinely delight in the misery of others. Every act of bigotry, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, transphobia, and antisemitism comes from conservatives. They are not “the extremists” of their group. They are their group.

    Teach your children why we don’t do business or keep relationships with conservatives. Marginalize hate by marginalizing the hate group.

    • TechyDad
      link
      61 year ago

      The problem is that the Republican party isn’t a “center-right” party anymore (if they ever were). They are now a far right party. In the past, Republicans would give dogwhistle support to far right causes, but would moderate their stances to get widespread public support. Now, Republicans have decided that there’s no need to moderate. Instead, they’ll simply remove democracy so that they can remain in power no matter how unpopular their views.

  • pingveno
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    Philip Wallach of the American Enterprise Institute called the visioning effort an “authoritarian fantasy.”

    When the center-right is like “slow down, too far crazy right”, you know it’s bad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the center right is more like “Don’t say it out loud yet, we don’t have enough public support.”

      When it comes to Republicans, I don’t think there’s actually a divide between moderates and radicals. There are the people who want to impose a Handmaid’s Tale authoritarian theocracy right away. Then there are the people who also want a Handmaid’s Tale authoritarian theocracy but think they don’t have enough public support for revolution and want to gradually move America further to the right by taking over school boards and sabotaging liberal public institutions and so on. The destination is the same, only the strategy differs.

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Poilievre will be bringing this to Canada if he gets the opportunity.

  • @Gradually_Adjusting
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    Silver lining, maybe people will ask why I emigrated less often.

  • subignition
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Title suck, it’s not happening right now but rather what Republicans are gearing up for.

    The far-right wish list is part of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, laying out policy positions for the next Republican president, and led by a cadre of former Trump administration officials.

    Right wing thinkers are circulating a chilling 920 page blueprint for the next President to declare the mere existence of trans people pornographic. These are not cranks, this is the Republican policy establishment. pic.twitter.com/ZU1jqCKIgCAri Drennen (@AriDrennen) September 7, 2023
    
    
    • @ChonkyOwlbear
      link
      171 year ago

      The Heritage Foundation is a terrorist organization.

    • vortic
      link
      151 year ago

      The title didn’t day it is happening right now. It said that is what is on their “vision board”.

      • subignition
        link
        fedilink
        -61 year ago

        ‘“vision board” outlaws’ is pretty unambiguously saying the board is doing the outlawing.
        They didn’t say “wants to outlaw” or “would outlaw”

          • subignition
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re right, I’m a member of the general public who has never heard the term before.
            So I have

            • the general understanding that a “board” is usually a group of individuals with some sort of authority.
            • An unknown adjectival noun “vision”. And
            • the present tense verb “outlaws”

            The headline could have replaced “vision board” with the word “proposals” used in the first sentence of the article and been more clear. But I feel like the choice may have been a deliberate one to drive clicks. (outlaws -> propose it should be outlawed)

            If it’s supposed to be this sort of hokey motivational poster, is this really a common term now? Maybe I am too old.

            Edit: Very interesting. This term has a definite trend in January (New Year’s resolutions?) but the trend only seems to have kicked off around 2011. https://i.imgur.com/SQDyfSS.png

            Old confirmed! There are dozens of us!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I made some vision boards back in grade school but I don’t remember them having too much political power

  • TechyDad
    link
    71 year ago

    It would also define anything “transgender related” (and possibly anything LGBTQ related in general) as pornography.

    “Jimmy decided that he really was a woman and so traditioned to being called Tina and used she/her pronouns.” According to their vision board, this would be deemed pornography and I would be arrested for having written it.

    Obviously, it’s not porn, but they are combining their hatred of porn (at least public hatred of it) with their hatred of LGBTQ and want to make both criminal offenses.

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    These people seem to need a quick trip with some hemp

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    There should be a LOT more discussion about Project 2025.