• Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Taylor Swift. Like, I get that billionaires are a problem, and her carbon footprint is huge. On the list of problematic billionaires, I feel like she really doesn’t do that much problematic shit compared to the others.

    Musk is a Nazi that gutted the US govt, Ellison has a laundry list of major issues, bezos is killing small businesses and bought a news company to whitewash himself, gates was involved with Epstein and did some shady shit to grow Microsoft, the waltons single handedly massacred thousands (millions?) of small businesses with anticompetitive practices.

    I really don’t think that Swift rises remotely close to the same level of degeneracy and existential threat that these guys do, yet the only other billionaire I see getting criticised as much as her is Musk.

    • AA5B
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      Was about to downvote, before I looked at the community. This is not an unpopular opinion

  • Scott 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What a CEO or founder of a company does off the clock. Brave, Mozilla, Mullvad, Proton, GrapheneOS - I just don’t care. If I picked a product off of the CEO not being a dick, I wouldnt have any products or services to use.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Shitlibs”

    Weird fuckin’ american paradigm. I’ve simultaneously been called a shitlib, a tankie, a communist and a capitalist. Piss.

  • glimse
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Pineapple on pizza. I don’t even like it that much but holy shit, shut the fuck up about it. You must have zero personality if you think it bring it up

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Cultural appropriation.

    So… You’re offended. People are living out of their cars now. I’m more worried about that.

  • FRYD@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Most things. The internet is a rage factory these past few years. I got enough real things to be upset about.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Firefox purity testing. Oh no they ran an ad or made a post on a mainstream platform or developed a widget. Look at the state of the world this is such a non issue and compared to the other browsers out there they are fighting the good fight unequivocally.

    • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I had to lol at Firefox today, it wouldn’t let me log into my modem because it was DANGEROUS. Awwww. Lucky I have Librefox as well, it lets me play with matches and drink puddle water.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        librewolf but also any flavor of chrome should show the same warning for self signed certs, for the first time. check it in a private window of librewolf

    • nullspace
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m glad someone said this. I don’t have two fucks to give about Firefox’s marketing department marketing their browser.

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Especially with the World Cup stuff that you can turn off with two clicks. Everyone and their dog watches football, this is the single most uncontroversial thing the nerd browser can add to appeal to new people

    • Katana314
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I have long agreed the fight for game preservation and access has been important, but I’ll admit I have a hard time with the stern argument that discs were key to that.

      I may be biased towards my Steam usage.

    • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      ik proprietary shitware and all that stuff but there are good games for playstation. fun to play, no pay to win bs like mobile phone games these days

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For me, physical media in general. Modern software is not static. It’s too complex. Asking for a bug-free game is basically impossible, so you need a way to update it.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Trans people: I don’t care which sportball team you play on or what bathroom you use, just wash your hands when you’re done.

    Whatever is in your pants is none of my business unless you’re trying to make it my business (in which case, I’m flattered, but in a monogamous relationship, sorry).

    • AA5B
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      My only real interest in this as a controversy, is bringing back single use bathrooms open to all would be nicer for all of us while leaving this outrage nowhere to go

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This should be the baseline bottom, but somehow its not. If you care or not or think its “wrong”, just keep it to yourself because Trans people are not harming anyone.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I have met 4 Trans people in my entire life, and they are just normal kind people. They’re not cheating at sports, or being weird in bathrooms, or anything people are fearmongering; they just want to live their life comfortable in their bodies

    • BladeFederation@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m with you on this, but I’m also against the opposite: the blind praise and promotion of being trans for some reason. Look, if you have something wired in your brain different that makes you present as another gender, go ahead. Present yourself how you want, I can’t imagine why I’d give much of a shit. It’s a free country. But why do people have to constantly yap and take over every non right wing chud internet space to make it about being trans or related like talking about how hot femboys are. It’s like…I mean honestly? A trend. And something major and life changing like that shouldn’t be a trend. I’m sorry but that is dumb. Have your own spaces where you can talk about your own issues, sure. Don’t be afraid to mention it in other spaces, sure. I’m cool with that. But maybe don’t take over everyone else’s spaces and make everything about you. Being annoying on purpose just doesn’t work in your favor.

      Also related, if psychologists and such agree that the best way to treat gender dysphoria is hormones, that’s cool. But like maybe don’t push socialized treatment for that so hard when we have literally nothing else socialized in healthcare. Priorities, you know? People are dying, every day, and cosmetic appearance for something a lot of people find weird and off putting is too easy of a target to keep healthcare terrible. I’m not saying it’s right, but you have to pick your battles sometimes. Just like if you want to make someone not racist towards black people, maybe show them something like jazz or soul first, not hip hop. Is hip hop art? Absolutely, one of my favorite genres. But it’s going to be an immediate turnoff if you jump to bad language and drug dealing and bitches and the other rap tropes. Should you have to cater to someone racist or transphobic? No, but that’s the world we live in. Everyone gets to vote. and everyone starts somewhere with understanding people different than themselves.

      Trans rights are human rights in the sense that you should be free to look and present how you want and not be harassed about it. But that doesn’t mean you get to have everything you want, for free, and everyone has to not only treat and react to you exactly how you imagined it in your head, but also praise you for being different. That’s not how the world works, for anything.

      • Katana314
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I definitely understand the annoyance, but I let it go because I understand how “Pride” works as a concept.

        Bigots and Nazis need to feel “popular”, like they live in a world of their making. One of the biggest weapons against them is showing how unpopular they are. The day that they make an offhand crass comment, and the whole room turns against them.

        Pride moments, raising trans positivity unwarranted, are meant to trap and push out those mentalities; keep reminding hateful bigots that “You are not welcome. Cut it out.”

        Where it gets tricky is for the many people who are fine with it and don’t care, but just get gradually annoyed. I’m partly there, but I also understand that Trans people have put up with enough of the world’s shit that they’re allowed to vent back for a generation or so at all the baseless hate.

        Priority in socialized healthcare is a tricky fight. Everyone wants their cause supported, when really all of them should be. The infighting is based around fear, and not entirely unwarranted, so I don’t have easy answers.

        • BladeFederation@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          44 minutes ago

          I think this is well said. You should be proud to be who you are, and sometimes bigots need a reality check, but it gets to a point where it is counter productive. I remember a few years ago when people were upset about the Proud Boys militia, and leftists made memes about gay dudes wearing banana hammocks being our “proud boys” because of gay pride. And, uh…no. First, it’s just not funny, so it fails as a meme. Second, being gay does not make you the representative of leftist/progressive ideals, I’m sorry. And third, I don’t particularly want to see a dude’s dick imprint on my home page either, please stop.

          Granted, I am in more leftist spaces than most people, but I see the trans flag more than any flag, even the US flag. Even during the world cup where every country was patriotic, I still saw more trans flag spam than anything else. And that is absolutely ridiculous to me, especially for a cause such as being trans, whose identity is generally “I want to be seen as the other gender and I’d prefer people don’t make a big deal about it”, not “my identity is being trans and I will never let you stop thinking about what’s in my pants”.

          I hear you with healthcare but in most cases, “my cause or your cause” is the same cause, even if it doesn’t specifically apply to you. If life saving medicine is free, we all win, period. Nobody is like “fuck people with type 1 diabetes, my tax dollars shouldn’t go to them getting insulin which would be negligibly cheap in a socialized system” unless they’re just vehemently anti-socialized medicine in general. Trans “healthcare” is, ultimately, not health related, it is cosmetic surgery or changing your body for cosmetic reasons. Mental health related? Arguable, and I do agree that it is personally. But VERY arguable, and not a lot of people support it. So leading the charge on socialized medicine by making it about trying to psy-op people into thinking “trans rights=human rights, and trans rights=access to expensive treatment paid by tax dollars” only hurts everyone by being an easy scapegoat. Not to mention the whole related psy-op of trying to convince people being trans, particularly “girldick” is hot in porn and whatnot, which is a whole other can of worms. Trying to trick people with thinly veiled propaganda is not the move if you’re trying to start a serious movement. And it makes the trans movement, which is already polarizing and on shaky ground, seem like a humiliation fetish, ESPECIALLY if you don’t personally know a trans person and only see what’s online. Which is a lot of people, since trans people are like 1% of the population, Trump is president so it is not popular to come out, and many trans people i didn’t know were trans until years of knowing them, because once again, the idea is to be accepted as the other gender.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Couldn’t agree more.

        It’s like…I mean honestly? A trend.

        This is the thing that really bothers me. So many kids claiming to be “trans”, when they are very clearly going through common teenage rebellion/finding themselves. It does a disservice to those who really do have gender dysmorphia. The conservative “anti-trans” crowd can point to this and say “see, they’re all just being weird”.

        And sure, there are kids who really are that way. My old ass thinks they should wait until they’re actually adults to go messing about with their hormones. That shit is permanent and they’re still developing. They can live as another gender in the meantime, no reason to stop that. But at least make the body modification decision as an adult.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Problematic media.” People who whinge over this are oversensitive children that treat fictional characters better than real people, think people can’t separate fiction from reality, and actively enable censorship states like the UK.

    “Gooner,” “porn addiction,” and adjacent complaints. “Gooners” seem much more well put together to me than the people who hate on them. I swear this is another effort from the global Conservative apparatus to increase repression as a bid to increase the popularity of their social policies. Also I swear some of you just see a woman who looks under 40 in media and call it gooner.

    “Cultural appropriation.” Not to say it doesn’t exist, but it’s been completely blown out of proportion, and probably does more to divide us than it does to protect anything. The modern discussion around it assumes everyone is an influencer doing things for money or power.

    • AA5B
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      people can’t separate fiction from reality

      They can’t. I’m probably taking a tangent from what you intended but the last decade in the us has clearly demonstrated that people can’t distinguish fiction from reality. That people’s words with a global audience can be very harmful even when easily disproven.

      We need to clearly distinguish “news” media from opinion media and hold news to reality. Opinion shows on Fox “News” are a great example of problematic media that needs to be addressed, as is a billionaire owner overriding the news desk of a formerly reputable news service

    • Katana314
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ironically, most of the gooner stuff showing up in my YT feed is from girl streamers.

      “Oh, wow! The new outfit puts her in a microskirt with a thong! Actually, can I move the camera down…? I can!!! This is so pretty!! Don’t judge!!

  • spittingimage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The moral failings of celebrities and creators who’ve been dead for decades.

    Save your outrage for things that are happening now, that you still have a chance to change.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Being interested in celebrity gossip is not mutually exclusive to caring about politics or more meaningful things, but I understand why people don’t care about celebrity gossip.

      I see this a lot here and it’s curious! Because would you say the same about other hobbies? That they’re a waste of energy because that could be applied to changing things now?

      • spittingimage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’m specifically talking about dead celebrities. People like to point out that HP Lovecraft was racist, Gary Gygax was sexist and Clark Gable was fascist. All true and well-known, but it’s much too late to change their minds about it. Whereas racism, sexism and fascism are going on outside our windows right now and can still be affected.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Ahh I did miss that you meant specifically dead celebrities. Fair enough! Thanks for clarifying!

  • Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Steam. Apparently I’m supposed to be angry they are a locked down monopoly but compared to practically EVERY OTHER GAMING COMPANY IN THE WORLD they are frickin’ saints.

    • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I buy based on trust, and at this time, steam hasn’t lost it.

      They’ve made their drm more lax over the years while Sony and microslop have worsened theirs. Like how you couldn’t easily play your games offline before steam deck.

      Still buying my games from GOG first though.

    • northernlights@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They’ve done so much for gaming on Linux I forgive them for having a convenient launcher that launches everything

    • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s one of those things where one could argue that steam is successful in part to being entrenched (all of your friends are on steam and all of your games are on steam, so might as well continue using steam), but also… other game launchers are just worse? The fact steam has a lot of useful features, as well as surprisingly few scummy incidents in its history just makes it not worth switching off for me :p

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do other launchers have the workshop functionality to add mods directly from their launcher? That’s been something I love about steam

        • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          All the ones I can think of are for individual games rather than general launchers lol. And third party mod launchers that you have to add your own games obtained elsewhere :p

          For me steam input the big one that pulls me towards steam; seamless proton integration too, but that one I could handle losing, steam input on the other hand I think is one of the best input remappers out there, I even added all my non-steam games to steam to make use of it too haha

          • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I definitely have some games I need to use nexus mods for (looking at you stardew) but it’s honestly such little hassle that I don’t mind.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I saw an article about Epic’s CEO having a gormless rant about Steams AI filtering and how but Steam was for them.

      All I could think was: “well, make a better product then”

      GOG Galaxy is the only launcher / storefront that comes close to competing with Steam, and that is because the one thing they do better:

      DRM-free games.

      The rest is about equal or slightly worse.

      If Epic looked at the customer base and analyzed what people wanted I am sure they could build a better platform than Steam, but with a CEO as unlikable as Epic’s and with his trackrecord it would take many years of hard work and effort to even begin to come close to Steam.

      It would probably take some massive PE/VC enforced changes at Valve where they start to enshittify Steam and the loss of confidence in the platform that will follow to make the other platforms competitive.

      • EtnaAtsume
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It would probably take some massive PE/VC enforced changes at Valve where they start to enshittify Steam and the loss of confidence in the platform that will follow to make the other platforms competitive.

        Make no mistake, it’s coming eventually. I held off on trusting discord for years buy finally they won me over. Now look where we are.

        Never again.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I have decided to bite the sour apple, as we say in Sweden, and overpay for the last two hard drives for my NAS build to complete it, then I will grab every offline installer for my games I can find and keep a local copy.

          32TB of storage that can loose two drives before any data loss, a solid start for backups, media and software.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Valve has been around since 1996, Steam since 2003

          Discord has been around since 2015 and was funded on VC money.

          Kind of different situations lmao.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              That’s true, but we’re not at that point yet so… What is your point? They’ve managed to thrive as a private corporation up to this point, clearly everyone working there is making bank too and treated well. (From all accounts I’ve read) so I’d hope the incentive is higher to keep with the same philosophy for whoever comes after. Of course hard to say, can’t undercut the greed some people have for making more money then they literally could ever spend.

    • THE_GR8_MIKE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yeah, the only people actually upset at Steam are people who have money tied up in other platforms. Steam is nothing but good for normal consumers.

    • UnfortunateShort
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t have any monopoly. There are plenty alternatives and all are trash.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah but they support linux gaming!

      and if you don’t use a linux PC to game, you’re a stupid ignorant complacent fool who is destroying society.

      or so I have been told like every other day on lemmy. owning a playstation or a switch is like ragebait to the user base here. apparently if i buy a switch i might as well support blowing up babies in gaza and mass rape as a genocidal tool, according to these folks.

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Linux becoming more user friendly and accessible is a plus though for individuals who like diy PCs, but stuck with Windows due to game support. Compared to then and now moving away from Microsoft is less of a hassle. That is pretty huge for long time Windows PC gamers. Not just for gaming, but regular usage of computers.

        From the sounds of it you dont like pc gaming in general, and that is fine. Do hope you can see how a non corporate OS alternative is a win though. Just having an option that is not a huge downgrade to a trillion dollar backed OS is amazing.

        You are on the fediverse after all which is an alternative from company run social media like reddit. Which also has its ups and downs when it comes to accessibility much like PC gaming, but there are similar pros to it too that some giving it a chance.

      • Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yeah that could be a whole different thread on here. I use Windows and Linux, I would love it if I could rid myself of Windows completely but Linux is not there, and I kinda doubt it will even be a total replacement for Windows. It’s worth remembering Windows didn’t become the monolith that it is for no reason, people wanted 1 application that could easily do… Well everything without needing a lot of manual fine-tuning. That ain’t Linux.

        • Rain World: Slugcat Game
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          windows became a monolith because of sabotage. and then! the network effect. microsoft is actively trying to sabotage linux, and they’ve got internal documents stating that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween_documents (the actual link is not loading)
          microsoft doing monopolistic anticompetitive FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) practices dates back at least to 1992: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code (yeah... i found out about this from a youtube video.....)
          and when was clippit (colloquially, clippy) introduced? <drumroll>… 1996. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Office_97)
          thus, using a clippy pfp is stupid. q.e.d.

        • AskewLord@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          i don’t even PC game anymore because it’s just not worth the headache. i also work on a PCs all day at work, so I want to sit on my couch to play games and not sit in front of a monitor for more hours of the day.

          And the reply is always ‘you are a retard then’. Yes, clearly, I am.

          • Grimy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            There’s no headache with PC gaming, this isn’t the 90s. You can plug a computer into a tv and use a controller.

            • AskewLord@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Right, that’s why when I tried to play fallout last year it kept crashing and crashing and throwing errors and fucking up, and i had to download custom drivers and edit files to get it to be somewhat more stable.

              but when i bought it on my playstation 5 it didn’t do that.

              weird how that works. also did similar stuff when I tried to replay xcom. so i just gave up. or how i have to give my nephews tech support every other month for their gaming pcs where games won’t load or play or frequently crash.

              but please tell me how I’m wrong and pc gaming is perfect and wonderful and clearly I’m an idiot if I have a bad experience with games not working.

              • Zarobi@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                The strength of a gaming console is that it’s a known quantity. My Switch will work the exact same as your Switch. Game devs can build and test with confidence.

                This isn’t true for PC; there’s a huge variability factor. My PC is almost guaranteed to be different than your PC. The unfortunate truth is that you’re correct: console games are more reliable, and they always will be. There is no world where that isn’t the case. If you just want to play games without any friction, a console is the better choice.

                People here don’t want to hear that though and will lynch you 😂

                • AskewLord@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  yeah, i like console gaming because it just works. and i am too old too waste time trying to get games to work.

                  on rare occasional a console game will crash, but it’s like a handful of times year. on PC i’m lucky to play for a few hours without a crash, or multiple crashes.

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, I have a switch from like 8 years ago and while I enjoy it for the mobile gaming while on long flights I wouldn’t buy a new one after all the shit Nintendo keeps pulling. I don’t know which other handheld would be a good alternative, so I don’t really throw shade at people buying new ones but I would like the company to hurt a bit.

        • MalMen@masto.pt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          @Oni_eyes @AskewLord I use the steam deck for the same porpose. I bought a xbox few years ago to play read dead 2, the onlything that could probably make me buy another console would be gtav, and even there I already decided that im gonna wait for a version that works on linux or otherwise just gonna emulate it few years from now

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      In comparison they are very good, however that can turn on a dime real damn quick.

      Scenario: gaben ded, bilzzard exec buys steam and it goes public. Hello enshittification

      • BladeFederation@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        So? As opposed to what, a corporation that is impossible for someone bad to take over? That doesn’t exist. Anything can happen at any time, but no use speculating about a 180 in policy. And they don’t actually have a monopoly, people just love them so much that they but almost exclusively there. If Steam gets shitty, I will buy from a different PC game store.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’d argue they do have a monopoly. My friends don’t know how to get a game if it isnt on steam. They are scared if I show them a game on a website to get (like armegatron).

          I’m just saying, do not trust steam, make sure your games are truly DRM free, and be ready to pay subscription pricing for downloads and steam cloud saves. With server storage pricing being insane and gonna keep climbing, they can’t keep giving you unlimited downloads and storage forever.

          • BladeFederation@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            First one is a quintessential skill issue.

            DRM free would improve Steam, I’m with you there. But if we’re talking about theoretical enshittification, there is nothing to stop them from adding DRM to existing purchases. And then you’d have to had to make a backup of every exe you downloaded, and not care about cloud saves, etc…so I’m saying I get your point kinda but there isn’t much point in speculating because services like that can always change unless the law prevents it. Which it SHOULD, but I’m not holding my breath. So all we can do is reward good behavior with how we spend money.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 minutes ago

              Yep I’d agree. I just am wary of any walled garden, because once they lock you in and kill off everything else (ie, the goal of capitalism) youre fucked. See: apple, amazon, google, etc.

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        True, but every option comes down to a hypothetical scenario which does speak of how it is at a decent place.

        And pc being an open hardware open OS system makes it so people can just hop to something, and have alternative means like piracy if worst comes to worse.

        PC benefit in the end is control over hardware, the programs we can run on it, and modifications that can be done to it. Something that requires hoping for jailbreaks when it comes to consoles.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would argue that is the other way around?

      “The internet” in general keep arguing that steam dominant position is not relevant, while they forbid any dev to sell their game on other plataforms for less (don’t even mention the steam keys because they are not part of the equation)

      • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s a pretty standard retail agreement clause that’s been around for decades before digital distribution. It’s not unique to Steam at all, letalone them doing it uniquely.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And is abuse of dominant position when you control +80% of the market.

          If a dev want a profit of 10us for game sold, it’s has to sell as 13us on steam. But if I open a marketplace and only charge 10% they could sell it for 12, getting a better margin selling for less, but they can’t if they want to use steam too. That affect players because cheaper options are not available, affect devs because they have less option, affect other stores because they can grow up competing on price.

          And that’s only possible because of Steam dominant position, because steam can strongarm devs into getting the same price as their competitors without reducing their 30% slice.

    • Grimy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      “What’s something the internet constantly gives a free pass to and simps for but should enrage people” wasn’t the question. The internet is overall much more a defender of steam than the opposite.

      The downvotes are kind of proving me right lol.

      • Fluke@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The fact you have so much rage over that is amusing me greatly, I thought you should know.

        • Grimy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Look at all the comments that came to steams defense. And yours, trying to like tease me? Lol.

          You might think I’m wrong when I say there isn’t much difference between steam and the others, but I’m not wrong when I say Steam is the internets darling. You’re here literally proving me right, thank you for letting me know about it.

      • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This would be the comment I would write if I was promoted to respond like the most stereotypical reddit gamer possible.

  • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reddit. They were irritating, so I left, but I couldn’t care less if someone posts content here from teddit or(apparently gods forbid) mentions reddit.

    I do not care about whatever happens with that company any more than I care about Apple or McDonald’s or any other company with shitty products I don’t engage with.

    • LordFireCrotch@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      My only issue is the bots that mirror reddit content over.

      And it’s not that it’s from reddit that bothers me, none of the posts I’ve seen ever have any engagement. So it feels like spam.

      • cattywampas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s much better in the smaller more focused communities, which is reddits best use case anyway.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I mean if it is a community for reddit reposting or other social media its not so bad because you just block communities your not interested in.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      i just block the people here who just spam content from reddit 50 times a day. and it’s always the shittiest ragebait, and if you point it out, they go apeshit on you and harass you and report you and call you a facist/nazi etc.

      then tend to be really dumb people who are true believers that post ragebait is ‘fighting the good fight’.

  • early_riser
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love Tolkien. I don’t like what Amazon did with Rings of Power, but I just didn’t watch it, simple as that. That’s how the free market works. People make a sucky product. You don’t buy the sucky product, they stop making the sucky product. And if they don’t stop making the sucky product, you make your own hopefully less sucky product. I don’t have the energy to complain about it online.

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      YES.

      I wish more people could understand that you can just… not consume something. You not liking it doesn’t make it bad and it doesn’t make other people inferior for enjoying it.

      Just scroll on.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ll do you one better.

      I like Tolkien, and I like Rings of Power. No its not a perfect adaptation, but its fine. Its better than those god awful Hobbit movies.

      • early_riser
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The writers couldn’t have made anything good out of what little they were licensed to use, IMO.

        But the main complaint online, that Galadriel is abrasive and bossy, doesn’t gel with me because that’s literally part of her character growth. I’m too lazy to look up the exact passage in the Silmarillion, but the reason she joined the Noldor’s exodus out of Aman was to set herself up as a ruler. By the time the Fellowship meets her in LOTR she’s thousands of years wiser.

      • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I strongly dislike when a single book is turned into multiple movies. You get 1-2 movies of nothing but set-up and trying to turn minor events into a climax, then one manic movie of nothing but climax

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My personal annoyance is with the hubris required to think you can write LOTR lore better than Tolkien. All the money in the history of the universe couldn’t facilitate that. Amazon sucks.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Usually anything to do with celebrity drama. While it’s not that common on Lemmy, the rest of the pop internet seems infatuated with what actor/musician threw shade or dissed some other, or which diva is being treated SO unfairly…

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      those are the same people who cause all the drama in their own lives.

      they love the celebrity stuff because it validates their own misery and poor choices. they view themselves as the poorly treated diva.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of celebrity gossip is rooted in the true crime aspect of it. Like the Secret Lives of Mormon Wives drama - one of the women was literally throwing metal barstools at her children while fighting with her partner. The outrage stems from people wanting her held accountable in some form. And the networks know that outrage will spur more views.

      I don’t see it any different than indulging in sports gossip or even Fediverse related gossip (Tesseract incident, anyone?). People like to indulge in some judgment and outrage at others. It can be unhealthy, but mostly I think it’s a rather neutral, human thing to do.