Incorrect AI-generated answers are forming a feedback loop of misinformation online.

  • @Brimos
    link
    English
    1211 year ago

    Speed running our way to “electrolytes, it’s what plants crave!” I see … if you know, you know.

    • @Dippy
      link
      English
      511 year ago

      President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho did seem more entertaining at least then the circus we’ve had for the last few years. At least we can look forward to that?

      Plus Ow! My balls! Does seem like some good tv.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        631 year ago

        He was a great president. Saw a problem, admitted his ignorance to it, and hired the smartest person he could find to fix it.

        • @suodrazah
          link
          English
          281 year ago

          Our timeline is far worse.

          • @Cabrio
            link
            English
            151 year ago

            A benevolent idiot is better than a malicious ignorant.

        • @Dippy
          link
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          True, but given his cabinet, is 1 out of 6 that great in selecting?

          • @False
            link
            English
            141 year ago

            They can’t all be like the attorney general.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Hiring special needs, women and letting members of the public rise above their station to become one of the cabinet?

            Sure it’s literally for all the wrong reasons but honestly doesn’t seem any different than now and with less institutional corruption… so… maybe???

            • @Dippy
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              Nepotism, as I think the secretary of education was his step brother? So still a little corrupt.

          • fmstrat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            But how do you know they weren’t the best there was? It was bad times you know.

  • @expatriado
    link
    English
    641 year ago

    Quora

    well, there is the problem

    • @Moc
      link
      English
      32
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Festering pit of misinformation it is. And yes, they’ll ban you for calling it out or correcting the record.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        i tried to deliberately get a ban there after they refused to delete my account ant i just couldn’t

        • 10EXP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I… don’t think they can refuse to delete your account. You could straight up file a GDPR request.

          • voxel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            yeah gdpr should probably work… the official deletion flow is broken for me

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    551 year ago

    You can melt anything. An egg will burn first. Then you will get some type of rendered carbon ash. Which will, eventually, melt and/or vaporize with enough heat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Melting is a physical process that changes the form and aggregation state of a thing, but it still remains that thing. Melted gold is still gold, for example.

      Burning on the other hand is a chemical process that leads to new “things”. The egg isn’t longer an egg.

      • @Gabu
        link
        English
        -61 year ago

        You’re comparing an element to a hyper complex concept (not even a structure).

        • @surewhynotlem
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          If you don’t agree with him, then you’re saying butter doesn’t melt.

        • radix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Water isn’t an element, but it still adheres to these rules.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      I would argue that it’s no longer ‘egg’ once it’s carbon ash and therefore never melted before it’s existence ended.

      • @3ntranced
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        Which came first, the egg or the time dilation of carbon atoms?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      Well, for eggs, that are carbon based, you will in fact have problems since carbon doesn’t have a liquid state at regular atmospheric pressure. I guess you can add pressure, but is that really what we mean when asking a question if something melt?

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If I simply ask “can eggs melt” and the answer is complicated but still yes, I would hope it to explain the complications and not just say yes. But I mean, if I just wanted a yes or no answer, and it’s technically correct, I’m cool with that. I could always follow up with “how” if the simple answer doesn’t satisfy me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, I agree. But what I mean is that when people ask physics questions, it is often implicitly understood to mean under current conditions. You rarely hear normal people or kids (who I find asks most of the physics question) include anything about frictionless vacuums in the question. (For reference: https://xkcd.com/669/ ). So, for the egg question, regular people would most likely consider the answer to be “No, except under very special circumstances”. But, I agree with you that if a simple Yes/No answer is expected, it have to be Yes.

          • @Zeoic
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Wouldn’t that be true for everything then? 3,400C is pretty special circumstances in my book, yet we say tungsten melts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I don’t think adding heat is a special circumstance like adding pressure is. It’s very easy to add heat to something. Adding pressure means building a sealed environment to enclose it’s, and some specialized equipment to increase the pressure.

              Adding heat requires that you burn something. That’s it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Yes, you have a point. However adding heat is often implicit when talking about melting stuff. However, if it requires 3400C, then the answer would probably include a comment about that.

    • @Zeth0s
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      Eggs are primarily comprised of colloidal suspension.

      Colloids cannot melt, as they are not in a solid phase

    • @diviledabit
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      But then you’re melting carbon ash and not eggs.

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Which raises an interesting question: what if you cooked it in a zero oxygen environment (say argon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide… basically welding gases because they’re mostly inert). I can’t burn in that context, so does it melt? Or do you drive off all the volatiles and are just left with carbon anyway?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you heat carbon based stuff without oxygen a process called pyrolysis happens. It separates the components into their molecules and molecules into smaller molecules with less weight. During this process you can gain different materials.

        Not sure what kind of products are possible with the pyrolysis of egg + welding gases though lol

        If you heat carbon in a vacuum (via radiation) you can get melted carbon!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          If you heat carbon in a vacuum, it sublimates straight to gas. If you heat it under extreme pressure in an inert gas atmosphere, then it can melt. Unfortunately creating such pressures in the lab is only possible with diamond anvil presses, which are themselves carbon and thus tend to sublimate from the heat, resulting in pressure vessel failure. Doing the experiment on the surface of a neutron star would work, but presents some other difficulties.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      In an inert atmosphere under enough pressure pretty much anything can melt without burning.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        This is the correct answer. In a vaccum wood won’t burn for instance. It will melt, and even sublimate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      An egg is already liquid, so it can’t be molten. It’s the same way you can’t melt water.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    well it’s referencing this article now

    • @WhiteHawk
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      Somebody needs to write an article about that article that states the opposite

  • @nomecks
    link
    English
    351 year ago

    Take frozen egg. Melt. Repeat as needed.

    • @TheYear2525
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Thawing isn’t always melting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Had a friend open a conversation line by referencing something on Quora and I immediately tuned out. Quora is a wealth of nonsense.

    • @olympicyes
      link
      English
      391 year ago

      When my daughter was 7 or 8 years old, I caught her answering questions on quora on topics that she knew nothing about. Something to keep in mind.

        • @olympicyes
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          She was answering questions about ear piercings which she’d never had, but yes you’re probably right!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    can’t wait till more LLMs and content generators get trained on this garbage data and repeat it all over the internet ad inifinitum.

    • @Chocrates
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Truly the best future.

  • Tammo-Korsai
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    Even when Quora isn’t being ruined with AI, it’s flooded with Neo-Nazis that are self-proclaimed historians.

    • @Chunk
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Wtf kind of quora are you reading to find neo Nazi shit? I just find people shilling crypto and bad tech advice.

      • Tammo-Korsai
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I read a lot of world war two history, so search engines naturally shove such parts of Quora at me. Some are more subtle about being Neo-Nazis, but are defintely pushing the agenda.

  • korok
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I do sometimes “provide feedback” on terrible featured snippets, but goddamn does it feel like shouting into a void.

    • @diviledabit
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Ublacklist Firefox plugin.

      Add quota Add pinterest

      Make the internet a little less shit

      You can find some blacklist subs on GitHub too if you want to blanket filter out a lot of the other shit (like alternative.to and other bulk targeted result sites)

  • @WhiteHawk
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    They’ll be taking over the world any day now, just you wait

    • asudox
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      That human, you say? Are you perhaps also another AI?