• AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
    link
    841 year ago

    “What if they misinterpret our fanfictions as the literal word of some god and start killing and enslaving each other over it?”

    • Ignotum
      link
      251 year ago

      Skip forward 1000 years to people worshipping Harry Potter and praying for him to save them from the dark lord

  • uphillbothways
    link
    fedilink
    601 year ago

    When I was a teenager, an older friend told me how he learned in college history how the first Emperor of China wrote the language, made all these scientific discoveries, etc, etc. And I, knowing fuck all about Chinese history, was like ‘you mean he killed all the historians and advisors, then burned all the libraries, so he could take credit, right?’ My friend is like ‘uhhh…’

    Yeah, so turns out that’s pretty much how more recent readings of it say it went down.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He’s also not the person OP referenced.

          The actual “first emperor of a unified China” being a different person than the mythological “First Emperor, tamer of rivers, maker of paper, big brained inventor of everything.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They’re both cultural stories that were probably based on several actual historical figures at some point that were combined and mythologized over centuries.

          Take Arthur. You could maybe find the origin of the character in some Celtic leader fighting the Romans, then as people retell stories he gets merged with a different guy, and then when the Anglo-Saxons invade new stories get added and repurposed etc etc and now the French hear about it and decide it needs a love triangle where the English king gets cucked by a French Chad Knight, boom, now you’ve got a medieval courtly love story from someone once talking about the time Athor’lescs’op once stole some Roman sheep.

          The Yellow Emperor is the same thing. There probably was a Chinese warlord who paid for some irrigation ditches and wasn’t too big of an asshole to the peasants, and another one later who built some libraries, so they’re “based on a historical figure” but mostly the stories are just cultural myths that make good entertainment and maybe work as a morality play.

  • StrikerM
    link
    291 year ago

    It’s likely that people were selectively documenting information since the beginning of time.

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Yes, but not necessarily maliciously. No one person, no matter how good they are at being objective, can possibly see and hear and experience everything. Most of what historians wrote down would have been second or third hand information at best.

      I usually assume that there’s a lot of telephone-game style information passing built into any written record.

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
        link
        31 year ago

        No one person, no matter how good they are at being objective, can possibly see and hear and experience everything.

        Except Patrick Stewart.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      That’s what basically all of history has been, honestly. Our problem (or salvation, depending on how you look at it) will be that everyone’s random opinion is archived and will be viewable by our descendants. Previous generations had the advantage that their most asinine, pigheaded, and ludicrous ideas were filtered by history, since the more serious minds didn’t record in documents how a sizable portion of us were the absolute worst.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Previous generations had the advantage that their most asinine, pigheaded, and ludicrous ideas were filtered by history, since the more serious minds didn’t record in documents how a sizable portion of us were the absolute worst.

        You may be overestimating ancient writers and texts.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Okay but have you read Shakespeare? Or, for the Roman graffiti you referenced, Plautus? Or Suetonius if you want some good tabloid fodder? They’re similarly crude, and while there is a much higher level of literacy and wordplay, it’s… not that much different at its core. Even that graffiti, funny enough, has an example in the other direction - there are instances of graffiti in Pompeii which demonstrate a knowledge of classical literature amongst the urban masses.

            My point in the end is simply that history is written by writers, and writers are not necessarily less insane, less gullible, or less prejudiced than the general population.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    People were selectively choosing facts to mold their own realities before writing existed. The volume of information didn’t make that any worse.

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Of course it made it better! Actually it is not the volume, but ability to share and the bad incentives for the companies to increase “screen time” of the users of social networks.

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    The earth is doughnut shaped and big ball doesnt want you to know about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    Connect me to the matrix and give me a reality that fits my views, IDGAF if it’s all fake but looks 100% real

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        But I don’t want to be Neo if he took the blue pill, I want to be Cypher if he got reconnected to the matrix with a life he chose of his own.

        • swab148
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          The robots probably wouldn’t have actually done that

            • @LemmysMum
              link
              61 year ago

              Do you lie to your batteries when you put them in a remote? These are machines, why would they waste cycles on lying when you’re cooperating.

  • @samus12345
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    Humans have always been able to do that, even without written language.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    It’s funny cuz that’s how creatures brains already operate. Think of how many stimuli you’re exposed to but ignoring right now. Right this very second. Like that thing over there. Yeah, that! You totally had full view of it yet you had limited awareness or perception of it! Just like the excess facts. We’re built for filtering no matter what.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think I’m broken because I have counted all the little popcorn studs of my ceiling multiple times and spend time focused on many other stupidly mundane piles of “chaos.”

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        No, but without knowledge, you don’t get to choose whether you believe reality or not. Reality is just hidden from you.

        • @LemmysMum
          link
          21 year ago

          The difference between seeking knowledge and seeking understanding is the application of context and nuance.

  • @proper
    link
    -61 year ago

    with all that’s going on in the world these days I think webcomics are still the worst thing plaguing humanity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It’s weird because this one doesn’t even have a joke. It’s just stating a bad thing. You could literally sub in any current concern:

      “We should extract oil to create motor vehicles”

      “What if those motor vehicles create pollution?”

      “Shut up”.

    • DuskyRo
      link
      31 year ago

      Say that again after reading Scoob & Shag.