Meta Plans to Charge $14 a Month for Ad-Free Instagram or Facebook::European users would have option to pay fee or agree to personalized ads, according to company’s pitch to regulators

  • vikinghoarder@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 years ago

    Next they will target ad-blockers as reducing their income and trying to ban them using the shitty web drm stuff.

    • xylogx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      Their ads are natively served so ad blockers already are pretty useless for them already.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Facebook Purity completely removes all native ads and is updated each time after it breaks.

        It also lets you change the font, size, if pictures load, remove shorts and people you may know, custom scripts, etc. It works for nearly every major browser.

        I don’t use Facebook except to keep in touch with family, but FB Purity makes things… bearable.

        Also, don’t judge the decade’s old style of the web page. The program is really over a decade old and been maintained this whole time.

        • plz1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Served up natively” skirts DNS blocking. To block FB ads, you need something that handles DOM-level blocking, like uBlock Origin. That said, FB is cancer and I recommend blocking the entire platform, not just the ads.

  • Usernameblankface
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    After so many rumors about Facebook charging for access, it’s hard to take this seriously.

    • dalë@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think this will be aimed at mainly EU members after a law banning targeted advertising (without explicit consent) comes in which will mean a reduction in ad revenue to Meta, as a result they’re hoping to make up the shortfall by charging users for an ad-free version.

      • topinambour_rex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why would I pay for free ad when I would already get untarget ones ?

  • iopq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d rather give my instance admins this money

  • snekerpimp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Extract profit, building value is for sucker startups

  • Enlarging5805@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Add free doesn’t mean tracking free… they still gonna track you and sell your data to advertising companies…

  • Enlarging5805@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Add free doesn’t mean tracking free… they still gonna track you and sell your data to advertising companies…

  • Dramaking37
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    At least we know how much per user per month to charge them when they inevitably lose your data next time

  • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    How is a month of Facebook worth as much as a video streaming service like Netflix? How doest that value compare?

    • Scolding7300
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What does Meta even make per user? This seems like pure greed/satisfying the shareholders

  • olicvb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Think that’ll push the piracy scene to come out with some patch like the reVanced group? Cuz that’d be nice

  • Gazumi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    As they say in parts of Liverpool and Ireland… Get te feck!!!

  • foggy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    ISNT IT WEIRD how all these tech companies have been scrounging for change since about when massive sanctions were levied onto Russia for invading Ukraine? It’s almost like there’s a direct link between most of these tech giants and some Russian oligarch. It’s almost like Russia has been basically invading the US via social media for the last decade.

    strange init?

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The fallacy in your tinfoil argument is assuming the US are the good guys.

    • Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      To you people, everything is somehow linked with Russia. US tech giants have been under the thumb of the feds for the longest time, yet I didn’t see yall complaining.