• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2601 year ago

    His character and The Wasp character are lovers… Weird Al was probably the least Alabama option.

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    162
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actors are people who exists outside of their work with their own hobbies and interests. Paul Rudd is getting paid to dress up and play Ant-Man only at his job, so he can dress up and play whomever he wants on his own time. (especially Weird Al)

    Besides, if he actually dressed up as Ant-Man, everyone is just going to think he is a Paul Rudd impersonator anyways.

      • Margot Robbie
        link
        28
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re welcome, bingbong.

        Also, that’s esteemed Academy Award nominated character actress Margot Robbie to you!

          • Margot Robbie
            link
            121 year ago

            I really don’t know why people here always insists on addressing me with both my first and last name for some reason.

              • Margot Robbie
                link
                51 year ago

                … But Margo Martindale isn’t Academy Award nominated though.

                Why do you think I’m always so insistent on mentioning that?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      381 year ago

      Also, he’s probably contractually bound to not appear as Ant Man without permission from the studio.

      • @angrymouse
        link
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Holy shit this can possibly be the case. A little sad

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      That and I doubt he wants to be shooting ready in an antman costume to walk around the neighborhood with his daughter.

      His costume, other than the wig, is comfy as fuck. He can transition into whatever the night reasonably holds without have to have costumers remove the stuff and strip him of makeup, etc.

      Besides, its probably in his contract to NOT portray his marvel character OUTSIDE of the movies, simply to retain proper branding. If he tried to put on his own antman getup, it would pale in comparison to a pound of makeup backed up by CGI artists.

      • @papalonian
        link
        41 year ago

        I mean, I don’t think anyone was expecting him to get fully decked out in his movie gear, if his daughter wanted him to be ant man I’m sure she’d love it if he put on a cheap Amazon “Insect Guy” costume. That actually would’ve been hilarious, and with a mask on he may not have even been recognized

        • credit crazy
          link
          91 year ago

          Funny yes but he works for the same company that sued a dead kid for having a spider man grave stone

          • @uis
            link
            11 year ago

            As I understand in american legal system dead always win

        • Margot Robbie
          link
          11 year ago

          Pretending to be a goofy impersonation of himself would be hilarious and would help him stay under the radar, huh.

          Now, where have I heard that one before?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      You’re using whom incorrectly. The first usage should be who. “Whom” is used when there is no associated verb. The second time, whomever, is correct because there is no verb that pairs with the word. “Whos” are subjects, and “whoms” are not.

  • NightLily
    link
    fedilink
    751 year ago

    What a nice dad trying to keep the attention on his kid!

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    I really like Paul Rudd as a person and I’ve hardly seen any movies with him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    People really need to stop this celebrity obsession. He’s a dad trick or treating with his daughter a few years ago. It is beyond ridiculous that people not only tolerate this, but cheer it on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      You know, this is what dads do. Every good dad or mom is worth cheering on, since in this shit world it’s not granted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ha, I completely didn’t pick up how my post could be read that way. And you’re right! I meant more about people being creepy and not letting a dad and daughter go unbothered for Halloween.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Internet would be so much more peaceful without legit misunderstandings haha. I’m sorry, you have a good day :)

      • @Madison420
        link
        51 year ago

        I think they’re implying that we shouldn’t pay attention to it so these people can go back to having a private life. Maybe we can hope that might keep so many of them from dying by their own hands in one way or another.

    • @theragu40
      link
      51 year ago

      Seriously, this.

      All I could think of was wow, this poor little girl can’t even have a normal childhood experience trick or treating with her dad because some fuck head paparazzo is chasing them around snapping pictures of them. That’s so sleazy and shitty. She didn’t ask for this. She just wants to be with her dad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Firstly, it’s not necessarily a paparazzi - it could’ve just been someone in their neighbourhood who posted it to facebook.

        Secondly, here we are generating “engagement” with the product of their work.

        • @theragu40
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          First, sure. It could be that. My opinion is that it’s awfully likely that a photo in this format was a paparazzo. And if it was a random neighbor it’s pretty rude of them, too.

          Second, the title of the post had zero indication that this would be a photo taken from the bushes of a celebrity and his child. Comments here in the form of “engagement” are doing absolutely nothing for the person who took the picture. I’m certain the person who made the meme didn’t pay for the shot. We don’t need to feel guilty because we accidentally viewed it for free on a website that generates no revenue. The people taking the picture are the ones who are wrong.

          There are lots of groups out there who could use random people on the internet defending them. Paparazzi are absolutely not in that category. They are terrible people.

  • ScruffyDucky
    link
    221 year ago

    She went as an imaginary character, he went as a legend :)

  • ekZepp
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    Best Howard Stern cosplay i’ve seen in a while.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      51 year ago

      Only if he goes around saying “Dubayu-EEEEENNnnnn-bee-see” while someone dressed up as Paul Giamatti constantly correcting him “no no, is Dubayu-EEeennnn-bee-see”

  • @uis
    link
    21 year ago

    Wierd Al:

    • @uis
      link
      31 year ago

      No, really. He is voiced by Wierd Al, he looks like Wierd Al. So he IS Wierd Al.