Beau is Afraid was the last one I recall. I think it was mostly the latter half of the movie where I started to get a bit confused and needed the ending explained to me.


What movies made you look up some kind of explanation afterwards? I feel like I have done it several times in the past for more surreal movies but can’t think of any other examples.

It can also be a TV show.

    • Pons_Aelius
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As soon as I read the title of this post, I knew that Primer would be one of the first comments.

      You are not alone, that is the hardest time loop movie to wrap your head around.

      Relevant XKCD

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        69 months ago

        12 Angry Men. Gen X kid here, not my style, B&W a fair bit before my time, too old.

        My god. Put it on for a lark before bedtime on a worknight. Far too tired, stayed up all the way through, suffered the next day. Worth it.

        If OP had asked, “Name a movie you couldn’t put down?” or “What’s a movie that sucked you in and you had no choice to stop?” Yeah. That one.

      • @SzethFriendOfNimi
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        Mainly because it’s so accurately done. It truly shows how insane it can get and it’s made worse by all the people violating their own “rules” repeatedly

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I didn’t grasp the implications of the final scene with Aaron and the workers until I checked the plot write-up on Wikipedia.

    • @Lifecoach5000
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      I think this movie is virtually impossible to understand in 1 viewing.

    • Rottcodd
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      I was going to say this, but I figured I could just scroll until I found where someone else inevitably said it.

      By the end, I was just letting the drama wash over me and not even trying to sort out which version of who was doing what in which timeline.

      And honestly, I suspect that that’s the best way to appreciate it anyway.

    • Xariphon
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Came here for this, glad to be beaten to it. I’ve seen this movie three times and I’m still not sure I could actually explain it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Ha, me neither. Love everything about the movie though. The fact that Shane did everything for this movie (wrote, directed, produced, acted, music, editing), it was made on such a small budget (7k I think), and shot over 5 weeks, yet it really doesn’t feel “cheap” when you watch it, is such an achievement.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      149 months ago

      That’s cheating. No one knows what that movie is about.

      • @Traegs
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        I’ve heard that you can watch that movie in a loop starting at any point and it doesn’t make any more or less sense than starting at the beginning.

        • @CitizenKong
          link
          English
          39 months ago

          It was supposed to be a pilot for a TV series, that’s why it makes even less sense than the other Lynch movies.

    • @scorpious
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      I think what makes it so tricky for many is trying to “interpret” Lynch’s storytelling.

      Spoiler, sort of?

      At the beginning, we see a POV of laying down on a pillow in a dark room. Then a dream begins — with dream-logic and structure — and eventually winds up with the cowboy saying, “time to wake up.” Then the final act reveals what really happened to the main character (and how the dream made her the innocent victim/hero).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      I think all of David Lynch’s movies could fit here. I tried watching his mini-series “Rabbits” over and over to understand, and I still have no idea what it’s really meant to be about.

      • @some_guy
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        Check out the documentary Lynch/Oz, it helps put his work in a more straightforward context.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    239 months ago

    The Lighthouse. I really liked the movie but I would be lying if I said I understood it after watching it.

    • CorrodedOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      189 months ago

      I watched that movie with my dad.

      We were both equally confused and all the unexpected masturbation made it a tad awkward

      • Davel23
        link
        fedilink
        399 months ago

        I’ll bet. What about the masturbation in the movie?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    • mother! (2017, Darren Aronofsky)
    • Enemy (2013, Denis Villeneuve)
    • Men (2022, Alex Garland)
    • Under the Skin (2014, Jonathan Glazer)
    • Us (2019, Jordan Peele)
    • Titane (2021, Julia Ducournau)
    • The Neon Demon (2016, Nicolas Winding Refn)
    • Tideland, (2005, Terry Gilliam)

    And a bunch more.

    • @Lifecoach5000
      link
      English
      39 months ago

      Which one is your fav out of this list?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Of these, I think mother!. The Images and vibes there are taking up the most rent-free space in my brain.

        I neglected to mention Gasper Noe; basically everything he’s done. But his work leans too hard into palpable horrors for me to ever actively recommend.

      • @shrodes
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        Titane is excellent, though I prefer Ducournau’s previous film Raw

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      Honestly it seems like a lot of Aronofsky films are deeper than they appear at surface level.

      Loved Pi back in the day.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    2001 A space Odyssey

    No country for old Men.

    *Annihilation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      2001 was a movie that made me go “wait, what? People like this?”

      I heard it come up so often and was excited to watch it. Absolutely hated. One of the worst movies I’ve ever watched. I had to look it up a lot after I watched it because I was sure I had to be missing something big. But no, I wasn’t. Really not my kind of movie, I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I mean, it was groundbreaking for its time and it redefined the genre and a lot of moviemaking in general, but it really didn’t age well as far as moviemaking goes. Yeah, it has severe pacing issues, is undeservedly way too long and it got way too trippy and abstract by the end. Frankly a whole lot of it feels like Kubrick masturbating over how great he is, with a lot of scenes being way too long and serving no real or useful purpose on on the movie.

        I could say pretty much the same about Solaris too (the original Tarkovsky version which cinephiles always rave about, not Soderbergh"s, which I actually prefer), and if rumors are true, apparently Kubrick took a lot of ideas from it.

        And I say all that as an avid sci-fi fan. The books from Arthur C. Clarke are more enjoyable.

        • @Takumidesh
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          I absolutely love 2001 and could not get through Solaris, I’m sure I will try again, but Solaris takes the long meandering scenes (which I generally enjoy) of doing nothing to an extreme, and I say that as a tarkovsky fan as well.

          That being said, the third act of 2001 could use a bit of editing for modern tastes.

      • @shrodes
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        If you have the chance to see it in a cinema I highly recommend. Something about the big projection and sound, plus ideally an intermission really made it click for me

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Kubrick actually fought against including an intermission. It was the norm at the time to pause a movie halfway in, raise the house lights, and let everyone piss and get a snack.

          The compromise was that the house lights would stay down and the movie would keep running showing the intermission card, with the music that he had composed for it.

          • @shrodes
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            I can see from the filmmaker’s perspective but given it’s basically unheard of these days it felt cool and novel. Pretty sure the screening I went to did just what you described

      • @HardlightCereal
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        I watched it with my partner and we riffed on it the whole time. Thoroughly enjoyable. Making fun of the movie’s bad parts allowed me to get past the boredom and appreciate the good.

  • Brokkr
    link
    English
    149 months ago

    Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, but even after reading the explanation I still don’t know what happened.

    • @yesterdayshero
      link
      English
      39 months ago

      After watching the movie twice, then reading the book and watching the movie a third time. I now know what’s going on.

      • Brokkr
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        Honestly, I think you should be proud of that. That demonstrates both impressive commitment and intellect. Good job.

  • @DuckPuppet
    cake
    link
    English
    119 months ago

    Synecdoche New York

    I didn’t have a chance.

    • @Lifecoach5000
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      One my favs as far as heady horror films go. I mean not horror in the traditional sense but getting old is terrifying.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    Cloud Atlas (2012)

    I didn’t think the plot of the film was too confusing, but trying to keep track of which cast member played which character in each respective time period while watching the film was challenging.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      It took me like half the movie to understand the pidgin for New Hawaii.

      The book doesn’t jump around. Each story is like a book opened to the halfway point, with another book inserted. They’re all nested like this down to New Hawaii, which plays through straight, before finishing each story in turn.

      I love ambitious (if somewhat failed) movies like this, and I’m not really sure if the Wachowskis could have done a better job.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I completely agree with the last sentiment you shared! I think of Cloud Atlas as a flawed gem and am glad to have watched it at least once.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    I didn’t exactly need the ending explained, but Everything Everywhere All At Once has so much going on that I got really hyper focused on looking up commentary for everything in the movie. There were a lot of things I missed so I found it really valuable beyond just wanting to deep dive every little detail haha.

    Surprisingly, after all the hype of Interstellar being incredibly confusing, I felt like I missed something because it seemed fairly straightforward (not the plot, which was obviously convoluted, just that I understood the ending). Then I looked up explanations of the ending and they fit my interpretation so that was a bit anticlimactic lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      For Interstellar, I think it’s either you get it or you don’t. I got the idea pretty well, aside from the physics and stuff behind it. I talked with some people who couldn’t understand it and tried to explain it but it still left them confused.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t remember being confused. But it was definitely one of those movies where I had to sit for 15 minutes after the credits rolled to process the emotional impact.

  • skulblaka
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    The wiki for Bird Box told me a hell of a lot more about what was going on than the actual movie did.

  • @jordanlund
    link
    English
    99 months ago

    The Fountain. It kinda makes sense on first watch, but you really need to read the companion graphic novel to get it.

    • @yesterdayshero
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Me too. But I still really enjoyed the weirdness of it.

    • @workinkindofhard
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      I can think of at least two things wrong with that title

  • Haus
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    Memento is the most extreme cases of this I’ve ever experienced. A week later, I was still walking around with a notebook, slide rule, and french curve trying to work out what the hell actually happened in that bitch.

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    79 months ago

    • Waiting for Godot (play, but it’s been recorded, so like a movie) • Lost Highway • Rubber • Primer • Coherence • Triangle • Eraserhead • Pi