Reddit migrator here (shocking, I know)

Just wondering because I found out about all this yesterday and just realized the ammount of independent servers, but no sign of any ads or sponsors. So… is it all based on donations?

Also don’t just lurk, if you know you should answer because lemmy only counts users who posted or commented as active users.

  • @m88youngling
    link
    English
    11511 months ago

    I think this may be the wrong question. I am the administrator of a reverse engineered PS3 video game server, so it’s illegal for me to make a profit or any kind of revenue or donations from that platform. However, I maintain it for thousands of users simply because I and others enjoy it and want it to exist. That’s not a sustainable model for a business or for running something as gigantic as reddit, but it’s what I want and enjoy, and for right now it’s affordable, and I’m happy with that.

    • @_kato
      link
      English
      6611 months ago

      People like you make the internet a better place :)

    • @KuchiKopi
      link
      English
      2411 months ago

      Not counting the cost of your time, how much money do you spend on this server?

      • @m88youngling
        link
        English
        1311 months ago

        It costs me roughly $15-25 a month to host our game server, but I have other costs like our website that I’m dealing with as well, so taking all those other things into account and I’m probably spending something like $30 a month for now. I’m actively working to migrate my Wix site to WordPress to save money. Now, if we had thousands of concurrent users instead of like 30-40 concurrent users on a typical day, or if we needed significantly more storage, my costs would probably go up a lot. The growing storage and user count are both important things I’m thinking about carefully, because I imagine there might come a time I need to reevaluate our strategy

        • @KuchiKopi
          link
          English
          711 months ago

          Thanks!

          All things considered, spending $30 a month on a hobby is pretty good.

  • @ClarkDoom
    link
    English
    11011 months ago

    One of the points of federated and decentralized social media is that there’s no need to profit. The concept is that communities are built by individuals instead of a central institutions and the communal gain is what incentivizes folks to host servers and participate. I see it as a similar ecosystem as the open source software community who constantly gives everything away for free because it serves the common good, enables faster innovation and widens the spread of knowledge that makes everyone more successful/efficient at the end of the day. If these decentralized social networks can provide the same level of benefit as Reddit, I.e. people adding “Reddit” to their search queries to get first hand answers, I think that’s the singularity point at which people will realize giant social network corporations are completely unnecessary. I can’t wait. Seems inevitable to me because the entire business model of the current centralized networks is unsustainable - part of the reason you see Reddit making such drastic moves regarding their API or Meta investing in anything and everything outside of social media or Twitter throwing unnecessary digital products at the wall and hoping people pay for some of them. Once decentralized social networks are mainstream the ad target pool is going to be greatly affected and these companies will collapse under their own weight if they haven’t pivoted to something else.

    • AttemptNo209
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      What’s the general consensus as far as fear for future profiteering? Right now these platforms are great because the are run by people who genuinely care. Do you think there is any risk of this growing so much that federated content reaches the front page of search engines, followed by advertisers wanting space here? Or what about risks like reddit gold which was initially just a fun add on, which then became a “temporary” paid feature, which ended as a full scale scam.

      Anyway, I love what we have for now, I just want to know what everyone else is speculating for the future.

      • @JeffCraig
        link
        711 months ago

        The thing with the Fediverse is that things like this aren’t really possible. The creators of Lemmy are pretty anti-capitalist, so the source-code won’t ever support ads.

        An instance admin could try to modify it to incude Ad Sense, but the users would just reject that instance and move to a free one.

        I personally wouldn’t mind premium features, like animated emotes and stuff for people that pay for monthly subscriptions, but again, things like that don’t work in the fediverse because they won’t be supported on every instance.

        Maybe there will be some creative solutions that get made, but it’s highly unlikely due to how things are setup.

      • Rentlar
        link
        711 months ago

        Meta, a well-known for-profig company are gearing up to join the Fediverse, reaction is mixed, some server operators seem keen on welcoming them, some cautiously optomistic while others want nothing to do with Meta at all.

        In terms of paid features, might be a thing down the line but it will very from server to server. Cool extra statuses (e.g. Wow I’m a gold tier superstar supporter on this instance) likely won’t appear on other instances unless they decide to include something in the federation protocol that would display it.

  • Bob
    link
    English
    8911 months ago

    Why does everything have to be for profit?

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      3811 months ago

      This is the real question we have to ask ourselves. We really need to move away from looking at the internet as just a resource to extract money from, and instead see it through a social lense again. Look what late stage capitalism has done to our digital, social gathering places. Almost everything has become a product that needs to be profitable, to compete for attention and to extract as much data from users as possible and discourse has suffered greatly from it. I mean billions are donated to content creators simply because people want to contribute. Why stop there? We can shape the internet the way we want if we simply contribute and put our heads together. We don’t have to make a profit. That’s our strength.

      • Apathy Tree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 months ago

        I like this take.

        Due to life circumstances, I basically live on the internet, and have since the late 90s. My first comment on here was about how I support socialized social media.

        I want to go back to a time when I could actually talk to random people, and have meaningful discourse, even if it isn’t as big of a community or as content-filled. I want my social space to be interactive, not passive.

        Profit-seeking models push for passive consumption rather than actual meaningful engagement. I’d much rather have a non-profitable platform that people keep alive because they want the same thing I do. I’ll donate to it, as long as it stays that way.

    • AtHeartEngineer
      link
      English
      611 months ago

      I think they are asking “how are things paid for” not necessarily “are they making tons of excese profit”

      • @queermunist
        link
        English
        12
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Profit is the money leftover after everything has been paid for, though. All profit is, by definition, excess.

        You’re probably right and the OP is just confusing terms, but I think it’s an important distinction to make.

        • AtHeartEngineer
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          Yep yep, I think it was a mis-speak, definitely agree with you. Trying to giving the benefit of the doubt.

    • @ZeroHora
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • A Phlaming Phoenix
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8911 months ago

    They’re not, and profit isn’t the reason people run Lemmy instances. In fact, avoiding the problems that arise when human communication is capitalized upon is a driving theme behind open source software and federated social media.

    • @agitatedpotato
      link
      English
      2511 months ago

      Its been so long since ive been on a part of the internet like this, it used to be almost all like this, now its almost all a buisness.

      • Sota4077
        link
        English
        1611 months ago

        Right. I’m loving this. It is a huge breath of fresh air. Obviously the people hosting Lemmy.world have to pay for this though. If they put out a subscription that was minimal in cost I would pony up even now with the jank and all. This place is worth investing my time and energy into I feel.

    • @sriracha_no_big_deal
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      Profit might not be the point, but it is going to cost time and resources to run an instance. Unless the admin is just planning on paying for everyone’s ability to use Lemmy on their instance out of their own pocket, ads or subscriptions may be necessary. And depending on how much time and effort goes into keeping it up, it wouldn’t be unreasonable for them to want to make a profit on it so they feel like it’s worth the effort.

      I’d hate for an instance to blow up in popularity only for the admin to decide it isn’t worth the time/effort/cost and shuts it down.

  • @ickplant
    link
    English
    80
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Like many said, it’s not about profitability but sustainability. I signed up to donate $2 per month to help run the servers for lemmy.world. I’m very happy with this instance (and the fediverse in general) and want to contribute. There are plenty of other people willing to do the same. Together, we will make something much bigger and better than reddit over time.

    I love their $8/month tier description: “The $8 verified user tier. You’ll be allowed to place a blue checkmark behind your name. You’ll have to do that yourself though. And you could also do that without donating ;-).”

  • TheSpookiestUser
    link
    English
    5611 months ago

    They aren’t. Do they need to be, though? Maybe once the scale gets gargantuan, but even then - is it strictly necessary to be profitable? As long as donations cover costs, I assume most instance administrators want what the rest of us want - a good platform for discussion and content aggregation.

        • @RookiMA
          link
          English
          211 months ago

          AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA tooo

      • @grue
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        That’s the neat part, they~~'re not~~ don’t need to be

        FTFY.

    • @Cybermass
      link
      English
      1011 months ago

      I agree with this sentiment, there are a lot of admins who are very virtuous and and will pay money out of pocket and dedicate time to this cause which is appreciated. The big thing in the beginning is the actual time it takes to run an instance, when servers get big they are going to need employees, no one can be on call 24/7 for something that costs them money (with the exception of a child).

      Once Lemmy has around a million active users funding the actual server costs will become a problem but I’m sure people will figure out how to make money off of it well before then, wether it be ads, data selling, alternative services, subscription models or something else.

      Whats important right now is that as a community we do what we can to keep this place alive, and to help out the hard working admins.

    • rokejulianlockhart
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      That’s a good point. If the organization that hosts the instance is non-profit, they merely need cover their costs.

  • 🦥󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠
    link
    English
    4911 months ago

    The funny thing is that not all human endeavours actually need to be profitable for them to exist. It’s perfectly fine and normal for people to be generous and provide services for the community for nothing in return and for some of those in the community to help out too.

    • TwoGems
      link
      English
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • UltraMagnus0001
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It don’t need to be profitable, just sustainable and us humans are greedy.

    • @thawed_caveman
      link
      English
      611 months ago

      I’m going to split a hair here: any endeavour needs to be financially sustainable for it to continue existing. So yes, in terms of future growth of federated platforms, i am mildly concenrned that there may not be enough people willing to put in the work and expense of maintaining an instance just so free. If you imagine a future where the fediverse has Twitter or Instagram levels of users, it’s pretty likely that instance owners will want to monetize as much as possible, and then what happens?

      • @cley_faye
        link
        English
        1311 months ago

        it’s pretty likely that instance owners will want to monetize as much as possible, and then what happens?

        why is that “pretty likely”? People have been running services 24/7 for years, sometimes out of pocket, sometimes with basic community support. It does not have to be profitable, as you said, it has to be sustainable, which is vastly different.

        • @thawed_caveman
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Please see the full sentence:

          If you imagine a future where the fediverse has Twitter or Instagram levels of users, it’s pretty likely that instance owners will want to monetize as much as possible

          Running a fediverse instance is a hobby now, but if there are enough users, then maybe you can start making money from your instance, and that’s when profit-seeking behavior begins.

          You see, i don’t want to enjoy a nice cozy corner of the internet, that’s weak shit, what i want to do is obsess over how we’re going to ruin it.

      • @DiachronicShear
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        it’s pretty likely that instance owners will want to monetize as much as possible

        I disagree. It’s find to have hobbies that don’t make money. Running a lemmy instance can be that.

        • @hunte
          link
          English
          411 months ago

          Running any decently sized instance quickly turns from a hobby to at least a part-time job. A thing that you can’t just quit whenever is not a hobby and we should be mindful of that.

  • Vincent St. Pierre
    link
    English
    4711 months ago

    I am a proud monthly donor. My couple of bucks I send Ruud and the admin team every month helps make this corner of the internet a reality.

    So, that’s how it’s funded.

    If you’re able, please consider sending in a donation. You can do so at Open Collective or Patreon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      I didn’t know you could support lemmy via patreon. Thanks for the info! I’m going to start donating right now!

      • Antik 👾
        link
        English
        711 months ago

        Just a heads up. The link he posted is to support the lemmy.world instance not the Lemmy developers. I’m a co-admin at lemmy.world so ofcourse thankful if you decide to donate but I see your account is on another instance and want to avoid confusion. If you’re looking to support the developers go to https://join-lemmy.org/ and check one of the 3 donation links below. Thank you for your support, where-ever you choose to donate :)

    • Drunemeton
      link
      English
      411 months ago

      Help out a sprout?

      Both those links go to Mastodon not Lemmy. Am I right in assuming that your account Is on an instance that hosts both? Probably federating with M before feasting with L next?

        • Phil
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          You’ll also notice that donations are going down every month. That’s to be expected, number of active users has also gone down, until end of may, when it stabilized. We expext donations to stabilize as well, and if they won’t we’ll post a message asking for people to donate if they can/want

          If only they knew…

      • nymwit
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Did you figure it out? Fellow sprout here. Those links go to funding sites for Mastodon.world, which also runs Lemmy.world. It’s one place for both (and potentially other .world instances).

  • TheOlympian
    link
    fedilink
    4711 months ago

    I mean, Wikipedia does it and they’re the 7th most visited website on the internet. 🤷

    • @Cabeza2000
      link
      411 months ago

      And they have more money from donations that what they actually need.

  • @simple
    link
    English
    4511 months ago

    They’re not, it’s just donations so far. Reddit actually used to profit from donations only too about 10+ years ago and had a bar showing how much they earned every day vs how much they need to run the servers.

    • Labototmized
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      I wasn’t aware of this! I was reading through these comments and thinking that would be nice to have here too. It would echo the nice amount of transparency if something like this was implemented. Are there any downsides to showing this info?

      • Botree
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        The only downside is that it’s bad for business. Donations will naturally slow down once users see that revenue > expenses, or users will start expecting some extra features to be added with the extra funds etc, which they rightfully should.

        It’d operate like a NGO would and should but as a for-profit business (which is not ideal since they wouldn’t be regulated and audited as an NGO). Even if it does register as NGO, the show runners still get to decide their wages at the end of the day. And what’s stopping them from inflating the figures shown to users? They could say it costs $2m for overheads and pay themselves $1.5m as wages.

  • @Twilight
    link
    English
    4011 months ago

    I’m pretty sure Lemmy has been designed specifically so it can’t me monetized. If you try to place ads people can just switch to another instance. If you try to split off from the fediverse I’m pretty sure there’s enough data on other instances in order to clone your server along with its content (and mind that you don’t own the copyright for posts made by users).

    • @Hexophile
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      I would go as far as to say the point is that it’s not for profit. Profit incentive ruins everything, most of all online services and platforms.

      • @Twilight
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        I think it’s more than just “not for profit” - there was actual effort to make this platform as difficult to monetize as possible (probably as a lesson learned from Reddit lol). Let’s begin with the code - it’s under AGPL, which means you can’t set up a public Lemmy instance without making its code public. This prevents you from creating an improved version and keeping it to yourself to gain an advantage over other instances. Second, the fediverse means that it’s less likely for a single instance to become so big that it can unfederate itself without consequences, and while you’re federated you can’t really place ads - people would just view your community on another instance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I don’t agree - while you could copy it, if an instance gathered a large user base and had some well-implemented quality of life features, there’s nothing stopping them from putting ads on it and I’d guess that most users would continue to use that instance. If it has quality content, they already have an account, and it has compelling improvements over other instances, I can’t imagine that some unobtrusive ads would bother people enough to go to a clone of that instance and create another account.

          Sure, it could be done, and ad blockers are common enough, but I don’t think well-placed ads would cause some mass exodus. I’d even be okay with it if it’s in the name of paying the server bills for such an instance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            I think part of a system like the fediverse is that it only needs to annoy one person enough that they go get the code and make an ad free clone. Then people could just migrate over. Especially once we have beeter tool to be able to move accounts across instances

          • @Twilight
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            As long as it remains federated, you can access the content of one instance from another, so why would I keep using an ad-infested instance if I can access the exact same content from another instance? And if said instance decides to unfederate itself it means that every user that was coming from another instance will have to re-register, which not everyone will be willing to do. This can only happen if a single instance grows so big that it doesn’t need “support” from other instances anymore. I hope that never happens tbh, I don’t want another /u/spez ever.

  • @irkli
    link
    English
    38
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • NutWrench
      link
      English
      2611 months ago

      Yup. You can be profitable without expecting to get rich. The insane corporate expectations of “20% growth every year forever” directly leads to the enshitification of everything it touches, especially social media.

    • @Rengoku
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      You can pay in Lemmy? New user here. It is confusing enough to understand the concept of federation.

      • Captain Janeway
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        I’m sure popular instances have setup Patreon accounts and the like for donations. Each instance is (essentially) being run by some person. It’s just someone who decided it was worthwhile to set it up. They probably started with a small server in the cloud. At the start, it might have been free. But as more people join/interact, it starts to cost money. So the owner of an instance probably looks to the community to keep it running.

        It’s cheap to run, but it does still scale with the number of uses. So, it’s very fair to have a place to ask for donations to keep an instance running without burdening the person who ownsit.

  • Kichae
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    3711 months ago

    This has come up multiple times in recent weeks, naturally, but it’s interesting that it’s always framed as being about profitability. As if simply being affordable or sustainable isn’t enough.

    Communities being a source of free value for the server admin is always baked into the discussion.

    Centralized, corporate social media has done… bad things for how we see and interact with the world.

    • DreamButt
      link
      1911 months ago

      it’s crazy how much capitalism shapes our world view

  • jalda
    link
    fedilink
    3511 months ago

    The word you’re looking for is sustainable, not profitable

  • @dan1101
    link
    English
    2911 months ago

    It doesn’t have to be profitable. Especially for people that already have computers running 24/7 and good Internet, a Lenny server is just another process they run on their machine. Admin/mod duties would probably be the hardest part.