• originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1321 year ago

    “we dont care about democracy. watch us circumvent it in every conceivable way possible” - ohio gop

    just paraphrasing the article

          • @CharlesDarwin
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Well, if they can get just enough of the Blahs (and maybe a few libz) into prison on nonsense things like a “drug war”, then they can be sure to strip them of their vote, forever.

            Freedom!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      ” we don’t care about democracy. watch is circumvent it in every conceivable way possible” - ohio gop

      That should be the “entire gop” not just Ohio

    • @satanmat
      link
      51 year ago

      You’re going to put TL;DRBot out of business……

      Gdism

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Dear Ohioans,

    If you voted to support abortion, and you’re a Republican, then look at this and recognize that you’re supporting a political party that does not enact the wills of the people.

    Love,

    A Lemming


    And to others, I know, this won’t reach them, but that’s on them.

    • Tedesche
      link
      English
      -111 year ago

      And to others, I know, this won’t reach them, but that’s on them.

      It’s not on them though. If you send your message into a space your audience is not, that’s on you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        There are Republicans on liberal-orientated places. I find them all the time. You’d probably be banned posting this in a conservative place and get this post removed.

        • Tedesche
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Maybe, but that would truly be on them at least.

  • Rhynoplaz
    link
    691 year ago

    Good thinking Ohio, voting on the weed bill the same day as the abortion bill! They’re too distracted by fetuses to bother with the stoners!

    • Uglyhead
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I thought the GOP already came out and said they will put strict limits on the strength and availability of any THC product.

      GOP: It might be legal, but you’re gonna pay through the nose for it, it’s going to be comparatively weak, so you have to buy a lot, but we’ll put a limit to the amount that can be purchased at any one time so you can’t even get therapeutic doses.

      • @TheLadyAugust
        link
        31 year ago

        They probably have businesses across state lines they’ve invested in, and want to keep traffic funnelling out of state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It’s like they’re straight up saying fuck off to local businesses, and telling people to drive to Michigan.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    651 year ago

    So am I reading that right that the GOP wants to remove the checks and balances of the courts? Is this not a core tenant of our democracy?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      551 year ago

      They’ve been bemoaning the fact we have Democracy lately. They’re playing up the Republic angle, and believe the People can’t make the correct decisions for themselves.

      • @meco03211
        link
        271 year ago

        and believe the People can’t make the correct decisions for themselves.

        Have you seen their supporters? They’re right.

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        They have been doing the “well, actually” thing for quite a while on the democracy aspect, but they have turned it up lately, that’s for sure.

  • IHeartBadCode
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    Without yet another amendment, how exactly does the Assembly, the legislative branch of Ohio’s government, intend to strip jurisdiction from the Ohio Supreme Court, the judicial branch of Ohio’s government?

    The State’s Constitution establishes the jurisdiction for the high court and separation of powers prevent tampering.

    • @kescusay
      link
      441 year ago

      They can’t and won’t. This is posturing, noise, and whining.

      • ForestOrca
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And so it would be good to make note of each one of these posturing noise making whiners, and vote them out ASAP.

        • @0110010001100010
          link
          121 year ago

          You assume the people that voted them in want them voted out…

          • ForestOrca
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            ah, thanks! I hadn’t noticed my typo. You assume as well, I was urging those that voted for Issue 1. tata

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        …and if you do, the wimmenz will be forced to bring to term their little miracles.

        • @Fades
          link
          71 year ago

          They are eArThEn VeSsElS after all

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    241 year ago

    Weird, courts are going to be implementing - or not - the actual procedure? I say doctors should just give a middle finger to these GOP “lawmakers”.

    But this is classic Republican horse manure. Will of the people? Fuck that. Must be “foreign election interference”. Remember how they kept gaslighting over the “Russian hoax”, even if Mueller’s unredacted report does not claim it to be a hoax? Then, baby hands loses in 2020 and it must be Chavez’ election machines rigging the election…projection, always projection.

    • Billiam
      link
      181 year ago

      Alex Jones was claiming (without any evidence, like he always does) that because Kentucky re-elected our Democratic governor, that it proves there was election fraud. Like, hey you fucking dumbass, why would someone interfere to elect a Democrat as a governor and let every single other statewide office go to a Republican?

      The GOP has completely lost the plot. Get ready for them to claim every election they lose as “stolen” or “rigged” for the rest of your life. Or (hopefully) the rest of their existence.

  • CapgrasDelusion
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Two things:

    1. Absolutely double down on this loser position, please, until you’re voted the fuck out.

    2. Good luck. While I haven’t combed through the Ohio constitution, I hope the legislative branch can’t just remove the judicial, whole or piecemeal. Checks and balances and all that. But if you pull it off at least we can stop pretending this is a functional democracy of any kind, and all we have to sacrifice is Ohio. Maybe it’ll wake up a few people who still think there’s a middle ground to be found with the GOP.

    • @derf82
      link
      English
      191 year ago

      As an Ohioan, they will not be voted out. The state legislature has gerrymandered both houses to ensure a clear majority. This is why they throw tantrums like this. Their only worry is being primaried from the right. This is despite a constitutional amendment that was supposed to eliminate gerrymandering, but was really engineered by senate president Matt Huffman to be able to be ignored.

      Ohio’s best bet is a new anti-gerrymandering amendment likely to be before voters that will completely remove politicians from the process.

      • @0110010001100010
        link
        101 year ago

        Ohio’s best bet is a new anti-gerrymandering amendment likely to be before voters that will completely remove politicians from the process.

        I know this was recently cleared to start collecting signatures. Do you know where that’s being coordinated or where I might be able to find places I can sign?

        I’m proud to say I signed the issue 1 petition and voted for it. Would like to keep the momentum going and do the same with the redistricting proposal.

        • @derf82
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I don’t know, but I’m sure there will be information soon.

    • @pottedmeat7910
      link
      71 year ago

      Came here to say #1. It’s a loser position, so keep pushing it and see how well that works out in next year’s election.

    • @utopianfiat
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      There’s also a possibility of a federal lawsuit under the Guarantee clause

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The problem is people will still do nothing about it so long as it doesn’t directly affect them.

      Politicians have been insanely successful at making people not give a damn about others for a long time now. Unless the Federal democracy is attacked, I doubt people will do much elsewhere.

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        so long as it doesn’t directly affect them

        It’s kind of insane how we’re at the point where this would affect about 50.7% of the population or more, yet rhetoric towards oppressing this group is popular and competitive in the political sphere. What collective delusion do people need to have to think that “oh, If I, or my wife or my friends ever need an abortion, they’ll treat it as a special circumstance/exception”???

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Because there is no collective social/class consciousness in America. It’s all zero-sum, win at all costs, second place is first loser. You can’t afford to care about the stranger but the idea of safety nets and socialist public policies is demonized constantly as either weakness or deliberate theft.

          Everyone here would rather risk hurting themselves than helping someone else at their own expense.

  • Roundcat
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Several Ohio Republican lawmakers are proposing to strip courts of the authority to review cases related to implementing the newly passed Issue 1 abortion amendment.

    In a statement released Thursday, four GOP lawmakers claimed without evidence that there was “foreign election interference” in the vote to pass Issue 1, and threatened to block the ability of courts to interpret the new constitutional amendment.

    “To prevent mischief by pro-abortion courts, Ohio legislators will consider removing jurisdiction from the judiciary over this ambiguous ballot initiative,” the lawmakers said. “The Ohio legislature alone will consider what, if any, modifications to make to existing laws based on public hearings and input from legal experts on both sides.”

    Issue 1 passed Tuesday with 57 percent of the vote. It creates a constitutional right to reproductive freedom in the state, which protects decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing a pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion up to the point of fetal viability.

    It allows the state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability, which is generally between 22 and 24 weeks into pregnancy, except when necessary to protect the life or health of the mother.

    But Republicans in the General Assembly have vowed to fight the measure.

    “Issue 1 doesn’t repeal a single Ohio law, in fact, it doesn’t even mention one,” state Rep. Bill Dean said in Thursday’s statement. “The amendment’s language is dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.”

    Ohio’s six-week abortion ban that was signed into law by Gov. Mike DeWine ® in 2019 contains no exceptions for rape or incest. It is currently tied up in court but could have taken effect if Issue 1 failed.

    In a separate statement, Senate President Matt Huffman ® said the measure’s passage was “just the beginning of a revolving door of ballot campaigns to repeal or replace Issue 1.”

    Issue 1 will take effect in December, but it won’t be implemented until courts apply the new constitutional standard to abortion-related lawsuits, most notably the one challenging the current ban.

    The Republican-majority Ohio Supreme Court is the ultimate authority in reviewing laws to determine if they align with the state constitution.

    “It is very important that we see the new constitution be upheld,” said Lauren Blauvelt, co-chair of Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. “So all of us who have been continuing to fight litigation … will continue to work together to ensure that the restrictions and bans that are currently in place are no longer in place.”

    On the other side, Ohio House Democrats announced Thursday a law to repeal various existing laws that directly or indirectly restrict abortion care in Ohio. But Republicans hold strong majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly, so passage is an uphill fight.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    On a side note these signs should not be legally allowed to have slogans and shit. It obfuscates the props.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Several Ohio Republican lawmakers are proposing to strip courts of the authority to review cases related to implementing the newly passed Issue 1 abortion amendment.

    In a statement released Thursday, four GOP lawmakers claimed without evidence that there was “foreign election interference” in the vote to pass Issue 1, and threatened to block the ability of courts to interpret the new constitutional amendment.

    It creates a constitutional right to reproductive freedom in the state, which protects decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing a pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion up to the point of fetal viability.

    “The amendment’s language is dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.”

    In a separate statement, Senate President Matt Huffman ® said the measure’s passage was “just the beginning of a revolving door of ballot campaigns to repeal or replace Issue 1.”

    Issue 1 will take effect in December, but it won’t be implemented until courts apply the new constitutional standard to abortion-related lawsuits, most notably the one challenging the current ban.


    The original article contains 467 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!