The embattled congressman isn’t running for reelection after the panel found “substantial evidence” of federal crimes

The House Ethics Committee has found “substantial evidence of potential violations of federal criminal law” by indicted New York Congressman George Santos, and are referring the matter to the Justice Department. Santos announced that he will not be running for reelection in 2024 shortly after the committee released its report.

“If there was a single ounce of ETHICS in the ‘Ethics committee’, they would have not released this biased report,” he wrote, adding that he “will … NOT be seeking re-election for a second term in 2024 as my family deserves better than to be under the gun from the press all the time.”

The ISC report found that in multiple instances, Santos moved funds donated to his campaign to his personal checking accounts, and used the money at luxury store Hermès, OnlyFans, Sephora, as well as for meals, parking, and to pay off his credit card bills. His FEC reports included payments for Botox, a luxury vacation in the Hamptons, taxis and hotel stays during his Las Vegas honeymoon, and spa treatments.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    461 year ago

    House Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest will introduce a resolution to expel George Santos from Congress tomorrow morning. So, the vote will probably be after Thanksgiving

    • @books
      link
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hate to a political hack here but I’m hoping he survives the vote.

      It’s going to be way easier to defeat him in 2024 than a different Republican… Plus the Republicans should have done this as soon as they found out he was a shit stain not a year before the election.

      Edit nm Nyt is reporting he won’t run for reelection. Get him the fuck out of Congress.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️
    link
    English
    331 year ago

    Now if only every congressman was subject to stringent financial oversight

    You know, the kind that treats “not having a bank account” as a red flag

  • @the_q
    link
    27
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • norbert
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Well, right, they’re in power and everything but I’m not sure they’re actually capable of running the country. All evidence points to the contrary.

  • @clearedtoland
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    Now I’m curious what OF account he felt was worth spending campaign funding for.

    • RooPappy
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I don’t get the outrage. I’m sure his campaign headquarters was just a little warm and he needed something to create a breeze and cool things off.

      A place that only sells fans is where I’d shop as well. Nobody knows fans like a place that is for Only Fans, right?

    • @Tronn4
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Trump look-alikes

    • @Lauchs
      link
      31 year ago

      The public needs to know! For reasons!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yes, I want to know and also as a member of the taxpaying public, I’d like access to the subscription.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Wait a minute, you just gave me an idea.

      Has anyone seen Roger and George Santos in the same room together?

      • The Picard Maneuver
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s my favorite characterization of Santos. He’s just this weird, hedonistic, impulsive sociopath.

        Fake names, scams, costumes, it fits way too well.

        (edit: and that time he had a baby that wasn’t his “yet”. He was clearly caught mid-scheme or something)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I absolutely love American Dad. The one last night was the two parter where Stan thinks he’s Noah lmao. Fucking genius and I was laughing so hard I was crying in parts.

  • @foggy
    link
    101 year ago

    This guy is fuckin hilarious.

    What a joke.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The House Ethics Committee has found “substantial evidence of potential violations of federal criminal law” by indicted New York Congressman George Santos, and are referring the matter to the Justice Department.

    The committee, comprised of six House members equally divided between the two parties, unanimously concluded that Santos “knowingly caused his campaign committee to file false or incomplete reports with the Federal Election Commission; used campaign funds for personal purposes; engaged in fraudulent conduct in connection with RedStone Strategies LLC; and engaged in knowing and willful violations of the Ethics in Government Act as it relates to his Financial Disclosure (FD) Statements filed with the House.”

    The ISC report found that in multiple instances, Santos moved funds donated to his campaign to his personal checking accounts, and used the money at luxury store Hermès, OnlyFans, Sephora, as well as for meals, parking, and to pay off his credit card bills.

    His FEC reports included payments for Botox, a luxury vacation in the Hamptons, taxis and hotel stays during his Las Vegas honeymoon, and spa treatments.

    In October, a superseding indictment added charges related to an identity theft and money-laundering scheme involving his campaign.

    The ball is now in their court, but with a slim majority and a history of protecting their own, the House GOP may choose simply to wait out his term.


    The original article contains 445 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 50%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @eran_morad
    link
    21 year ago

    Those dumbass outfits of his don’t do him any favors, wtf.