• ryan213
      link
      English
      1021 year ago

      Time for that sweating and 2 buttons meme.

        • cannache
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Yeah man they don’t need to roll anyone, if anything they’ll stock up on oil at a discount. Just look the other way while it goes down lol

    • Granite
      link
      fedilink
      791 year ago

      But the confusion is fleeting, as it always is, because they don’t have the brain power to process the cognitive dissonance.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          361 year ago

          If the pattern follows, those young teen Millennials somehow are to blame even though there are Millennials in their 40s now.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -301 year ago

            I mean, it’s been just long enough so that Gen Z can just start calling Millennials Boomers and placing the blame all on them… which won’t be wrong either. Overall, Millennials didn’t change how they lived to account for things like climate change. They didn’t stand together as a society and reduce waste. I’m as guilty as anyone else, but its cyclic and Millennials just got caught in the absolute dog shit part of the cycle where we were blamed all growing up, and will be blamed on the way to our deathbeds.

            • partial_accumen
              link
              311 year ago

              Overall, Millennials didn’t change how they lived to account for things like climate change. They didn’t stand together as a society and reduce waste.

              First, when has ANY age group coordinated across every nationality around the globe to “stand together”? Add to that, the age at which you’re suggesting this should have occurred is right when they were reaching adulthood and barely grasping how the adult world works themselves. At the same time they were coming of age during back to back global financial crises with and even book-ended by one of the most deadly pandemics in human history, while also having the fewest resources to affect change. “Standing together as a society” is unrealistic at any age, much less the one they were given.

              Second, I’d argue at the individual level they made some of the largest shifts to low and lower carbon options than any other group. One example would be Veganism which would address the 17% of climate change gases from livestock. Many of them embraced bicycles instead of cars and small EVs such as scooters.

              I’m not a Millennial or a vegan nor do I own a small EV scooter, but looking at all the generations alive today, I’d argue Millennials have done the most to combat climate change in spite of the other generations alive working against their efforts.

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -12
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                4% of millennials are vegan. 77% of millennials drive a car regularly (64% own them, an additional 13% drive a car owned by someone in their family).

                Sure, but that’s still far, far, far, far, far from enough to offset climate change and the issues Gen Z will be facing because of it. Not to be too much of a Doomer, but when you’re facing the very real possibility of modern society collapsing under the weight of out-of-control climate change by 2050, all the patting yourself on the back for doing more than others feels… superfluous.

                I’m literally a millennial, and have seen that the vast majority of us don’t give a flying fuck (that’s why only 4% of us are vegan), just like previous generations. I’m not trying to be a dick to millennials, I’m trying to be honest with myself about my peers and my own generations failure to the future.

                Sure we did some, but if society still collapses, who will fucking give a shit?

                • Virtual Insanity
                  link
                  English
                  151 year ago

                  Yeah… Fuck us for driving to a job no public transport can get us to right?

                  If you wanna admit you suck go right ahead, but with the means I have at hand in making a solid effort.

                  Sounds like your not.

                  Consumerism and capitalism is the real issue. Must have the latest iPhone, the company must grow. Limitless growth must happen in a system with limited resources.

                  Typed from my 5 year old phone I don’t want to replace but Samsung agree pulling security updates so I’ll have to.

            • @Mobilityfuture
              link
              151 year ago

              Millennials have done a great job raising Generation A and the Zoomers… the kids today by and large are way more aware and woke

            • magnetosphere
              link
              fedilink
              14
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Cyclical but unjust. I already feel bad for the shit millennials will eventually get. They had none of the money or power to prevent anything. Yeah, “standing together” could have theoretically done something, but it would have required a degree of sustained (by which I mean decades), disciplined effort that very large groups of humans aren’t capable of. Hell, just by looking at the cost of living, anyone can see that millennials are having a hard time simply affording to survive.

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Oh I agree wholeheartedly. I wasn’t meant to be bashing millennials, but rather pointing out that Gen Z will have sadly valid complaints, even if it doesn’t justify it because millennials never really had political control during our lives to speak of, partially because of how dwarfed we continued to be by Boomers, as a generation. Gen Z only outnumbers them because so many of them finally started dying. Millennials never had a chance, just like Gen X, who is just forgotten generally.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          31 year ago

          The wind also contains chemtrails.

    • @LEDZeppelin
      link
      311 year ago

      Elon is looking into rolling coal exhaust on Teslas for his Nazi fan club

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        It’s just a trailer option for the cybertruck that’s basically a stationary 700hp engine idling without a muffler. It’s not generating power, just smoke.

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          11 year ago

          No, it generates power, to run a giant burner that is loaded with old tires, coal, and bunker fuel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        Hey @elonmusk Why Cant People Roll Cole In There Telsa’s? Your Not A Real Man If Your Not Rolin Coal —@RealPatroit1776

        @RealPatroit1776 looking into it —@elonmusk

      • Ann Archy
        link
        11 year ago

        And it will be in everyone’s best own interests.

    • @vegantomato
      link
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      racist cars

      Lmao. What the actual fuck?

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      641 year ago

      this is one of the few levers of power we have. remember that every nickel they have comes from us working and us buying.

        • Dran
          link
          301 year ago

          To be fair, I think one could argue with a straight face that if we’re still buying the products, then we really don’t care that much. Why should a company be motivated by morality if we as a society collectively aren’t?

          We should hold ourselves to the same standards or we’re just hypocrites.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If the only fridges on the market contain CFCs then people are going to buy them because they need fridges. If the only CFC-free fridges are more expensive than CFC ones then only affluent people, at most, are going to buy them.

            It’s called a market failure: There are costs associated with a product that are not taken into account because the regulatory regime doesn’t make sure they are. In the case of CFCs we went even further than making fridge producers pay up for the externalities they cause (which would’ve been an astronomical sum) and right-out banned that stuff. The consumer, after all, is still saving money with CFC fridges (their food doesn’t spoil as easily), they’re not paying for the ozone hole, either.

            See the free market is a theoretical model, it indeed promises prefect results given that all actors are perfectly rational and act on perfect information, the maths makes sense. Perfect rationality and information don’t exist in the real world, though (and in fact ads and company secrets exist to degrade the information available to everyone) so we need regulations to fix market failures so that the real-world market comes closer to approximating the free market. Misunderstanding of this point brought to you by peddlers of institutionalised market failure equivocating “free market” and “unregulated market”.

            The EU tends to have a good grasp on it, the US, boy oh boy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            In principle I’m inclined to agree, however isn’t this glossing over the degree to which markets are consolidated?

            You try to opt out of products/services and choose more ethical alternatives, but it turns out the most readily available alternatives are in some way connected to the same unethical parent company. Ultimately the individualistic approach to addressing these matters is untenable and requires collective action in some form (ideally it would be leveraging a government that reflects the interests of the people).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And those companies have spent a ton of time and effort discouraging and preventing people from collectivizing via union busting. There’s a huge power asymmetry at play here, an individual should not be held to the same standard of accountability as the people who literally control the economy through non-democratic or straight up unelected positions of leadership (board of investors or private CEOs respectively). They can, at any moment, choose to reduce their profit margin for the betterment of the planet - but they don’t, because as a small group of owners, they exist to profit so they would never agree to do so in a meaningful way*. And because they’re collectivised and we’re not (just look at the swathe of antitrust cases where businesses that are supposed to compete, have instead chosen to act like a cartel), they hold almost all the power. Let’s focus our attention away from blaming the average person, and onto the real root cause so that we can actually collectivise against that root cause rather than fight amongst each other.

              *: without the state straight up socialising their risk, for example the green tech grants and loans we have been and are giving out, all over the world. Something Elon Musk is very familiar with, given that Tesla might not have existed today without the generous $465 million government loan they got in 2009.

            • Ann Archy
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “Opting out” doesn’t mean you “opt in” to whatever forced you to “opt out” to begin with.

              If I give you a choice between being punched in the face or getting kicked in the crotch, it’s not moral acquiescence to either regardless which you choose.

              Your argument rests on a fallacy- “vote with your wallet”. This presumes that we don’t vote with our voice anymore, so it supersedes a democratic system of governance.

              Consider: “if you oppose slavery, just don’t buy slaves, and we’ll let the market sort out who’s right and wrong”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Your argument rests on a fallacy- “vote with your wallet”. This presumes that we don’t vote with our voice anymore, so it supersedes a democratic system of governance.

                Meaning this genuinely, not in a snarky way: did you read to the end of my comment? My phrasing may have been poor or a tad wordy, but I recognize what you’re describing and advise collective, political action instead of voting with one’s wallet.

                The parenthetical at the end wasn’t to suggest otherwise, only that doing so via one’s existing/current government may not be a readily available option, demanding one change their government so as to make it work to those ends. I should have been clearer on that point.

          • Ann Archy
            link
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, I don’t think you could, because you don’t really have a choice.

            I find this naive cynicism exasperating.

            “Let’s improve society somewhat.”

            “Yet, you partake in society! Curious! / sent from my iPhone”

            • Dran
              link
              11 year ago

              Sent from graphene but sure

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I think what you’re saying is either inaccurate or excessively vague. Many ultra rich people got money by inheriting it, through the stock market, and to a much lesser degree, through government spending programs.

        The way you framed the issue is a classic one, and it’s essentially blaming us, the consumers, for creating the problem that we are facing. First of all, that would simply be inaccurate because there are many causes, and second of all, it doesn’t really matter who you blame. The question is how we can fix the broken situation.

        • @TotallynotJessica
          link
          71 year ago

          Not really. They said consumption AND labor. Stocks are capital, and their profits come from underpaying workers for the value they produce through labor. Inherited wealth is also acquired through and stored in capital.

          In addition, the government is an essential part of capitalism, as it protects owned property more economically than the private armies of feudalism. Government spending programs that give the rich money are paid for by political donations, but the actual profitability is hard to quantify.

        • Alien Nathan Edward
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          blame, responsibility, and the ability to do something are three interrelated but distinct concepts. the ability to force bad actors to change by refusing to reward them for bad actions does not put the blame on us for failure to do so. If you forget to lock your front door and someone robs you, there was something you could have done to prevent the robbery but only the thief carries the blame.

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Tesla batteries and modular car battery charging systems incoming, they’re not going to give up their market foothold so easily now that they’ve got their foot in the door.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These people have money for blood, what makes you think their ethics are any different? I don’t care what sets the face eating leopards off so long as they get to eating faces.

    • nfh
      link
      141 year ago

      Expecting investors to behave ethically instead of in their financial interest? I see you’re feeling bold today

    • Lemminary
      link
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t expect people making bank to have many ethical concerns, tbh.

      “It’s just one small thing. Besides, there are many other things to complain about!” said every investor tied to everything people complain about, probably.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1661 year ago

    I’m waiting for Apple and Google to pull the X client from their app stores.

    Then the fun really begins.

    • YⓄ乙
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Not going to happen as all these companies work together. these companies are notorious to trick regulars into thinking they are helping the society.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        1. SocialMediaPlatform™ does something horrible

        2. Make a huge deal about pulling ads from SocialMediaPlatform™ to get consumers on your side

        3. Quietly return ads to SocialMediaPlatform™ after PR team determines everyone has forgotten

        4. SocialMediaPlatform™ does something even worse

        5. GOTO 2

        • YⓄ乙
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          Lol so true. Its not just Twitter though, most of the companies do the same thing. However its on us to not make noise and boycott the shit outta these companies.

    • @Bytemeister
      link
      Ελληνικά
      61 year ago

      Why don’t people just stop caring about whatever the fuck is going on at Twitter/X? I consider it in the same realm as truthsocial or OANN comment sections. Sure, musky had enough money to buy a platform, but that platform is elevated by it’s users. If people just stopped doing that, it would be irrelevant. Literally nothing important has happened on twitter, ever. We don’t need it. Just discard it and let it wither in the dark.

        • @amazing_stories
          link
          21 year ago

          To add to this, every politician, journalist, and influencer is on Twitter, so even if a majority of people don’t use it or post on it, the platform is a hub for ideas and real-time news.

      • Ann Archy
        link
        21 year ago

        Panem et circem.

        Meet the circem.

        They keep the panem.

    • @nutsack
      link
      51 year ago

      something would have to be seriously wrong for that to happen

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the EU, App stores already have a legal responsibility to remove apps that promote hate speech. While both Google and Apple are sitting on the sidelines while the EU is going through the legal motions to tear Musk a new one, I wouldn’t be surprised if they kick X out just before someone forces them too, just to pretend they actually care.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        They already have no problem pulling other apps for shit that Xitter is known to pull. Even when said other apps have a similar lack of control (or even less) over said content.

    • Ann Archy
      link
      31 year ago

      And the users will migrate into the welcoming arms of the 粪 client instead.

  • @eran_morad
    link
    1351 year ago

    Musk can a smoke fat dick. I am so sick of hearing about that cunt.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can we just fully cancel his ass so we don’t have to hear about him any more. I yearn for the day I no longer hear about Musk or Trump on a daily basis.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 year ago

        We let people get so fucking rich that everything they do is newsworthy because it actually impacts a ton of people.

        The real problem is that we don’t actually need rich people in the first place.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      211 year ago

      This story highlights why news about this is still important. The investors wouldn’t be doing this if they thought a lot of people wouldn’t hear about it and be disgusted.

      I couldn’t care less about whatever else he does, but when he does something awful, spread it as much as you can. We can see very clearly that not all news is good news for him. And one thing I do want to see is him discovering the consequences of his action, for once in his life.

    • @KneeTitts
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      And he’ll never go away, ever. As long as he has munny he will be a thorn in everyones side, he cannot simply be voted out like a politician sadly

      • Tedesche
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        Or—and please, sit down before you read any further—the media could…stop reporting every single thing he says. [thunder crashes. children scream.]

      • YⓄ乙
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        True. I do have a feeling like he’ll get caught doing some fucked up shit and will go to jail but with all the money , its really hard to tell if he’ll ever go to jail as jails are for poor people. Trump is the best example. Hope he rots in jail but I doubt it

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Nah he’ll just be forced to sell some shares before a big profit or they’ll arrange a boardroom coup to take away some of his autonomy, CEOs be warned, acting out like too much of a wildcard can appear self destructive and irrational to investors and shareholders alike

    • @metallic_substance
      link
      101 year ago

      Couldn’t agree more. He’s all over the news all the time, but Lemmy seems especially obsessed with him. I understand, given the demographics here, but I wish he would just go away forever

    • @scottywh
      link
      21 year ago

      The fucking prick really needs to learn to shut the fuck up for a change… And like yesterday.

      • @KneeTitts
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        I cant wait too see his ass in court for some crime hes been caught doing

        • @scottywh
          link
          11 year ago

          Oh yeah… hadn’t even thought about it but you’re right… That seems likely over a long enough timeline.

  • @StereoTrespasser
    link
    681 year ago

    “We are absolutely appalled at this behavior!” [Buys more stock in Tesla] “I mean really, this has gone too far!” [Collects dividends] “He needs to resign, this is disgusting!” [Watches stock price climb] “this antisemitism must stop or else!” [Buys more stock]

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But you buying and holding also contributes to the price going up. Just as you refusing to buy or selling your shares contributes to prices going down. This is how Elon has manipulated markets for quite a while.

      • @Bytemeister
        link
        Ελληνικά
        21 year ago

        I think what you meant is,

        If I buy Tesla stock, then I have a small voice in how the company is run, and I can push it towards a more progressive and altruistic vision.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tesla Investors Call for Musk’s Suspension

    They’ll quickly find themselves in the same position as the GOP with Trump. Where they want to replace him and cut their losses but the cult of personality is around that one person and nothing else. That’s what happens when your audience is so cult-like and fanatical. Not that I feel bad for either the GOP or Tesla obviously, it’s still their fault for cultivating these bastards and they don’t deserve the slightest sympathy.

    • @vihil
      link
      161 year ago

      Right after it dropped 30% tho

        • @Tikiporch
          link
          21 year ago

          So, you agree the upturns are as meaningless as the downturns. Good deal.

            • @Jtotheb
              link
              21 year ago

              Why must someone upset at potential losses turn them into actual losses? You can’t think of an alternative, like pushing articles on some mouthpiece publication, maybe Gizmodo? Nope, if anyone cared they’d all show it by losing money and influence, obviously

                • @Jtotheb
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  Sorry, I forgot that when you want to sell a bunch of stocks everyone just buys them all at your preferred high price, and then the price magically goes down after

    • @nutsack
      link
      81 year ago

      I’m sure none of them care at all it’s just pr damage control

      • Ann Archy
        link
        11 year ago

        “Who cares about the message attached? The product is solid!”

        • @kerrigan778
          link
          31 year ago

          Well… About the product being solid… Turns out it’s kinda flimsy and loose.

          • Ann Archy
            link
            11 year ago

            “Well, at least the message is good.”

  • stopthatgirl7
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Musk finally end that step too far. Dude forgot there’s a world out there beyond the weird right-wing bubble he’s created for himself on X.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    I’m sure his response will be doubling down and turning away more investors. But if that goofy fucking truck being shit, delayed, and possibly a scam didn’t dissuade them…

    • @radix
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      Melon Husk ranting about “cancel culture” in 3…2…1…

  • @Illuminostro
    link
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hurt him in the way that’s most painful to narcissists: remove his ability to generate narcissistic supply. Kill Xcrement.

  • @dhork
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    Suspend him from where?

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      621 year ago

      From a ridiculously slow lowering mechanism above a tank full of sharks with frickin’ laser beams on their heads.

        • @Stanwich
          link
          11 year ago

          I’m good with ill tempered or terribly vexed.