• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6710 months ago

      It shouldn’t have needed to exist in the first place.

      If you or I pulled this behavior, we wouldn’t get gag orders. We’d be held in contempt and locked up.

      • DarkGamer
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Indeed, a normal defendant would have been treated much differently. Then again, a normal defendant doesn’t have an army of enraged violent dipshits with a tenuous relationship with reality, eager and willing to end democracy on his behalf, supporting them. That’s why he gets treated with kid gloves.

        • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
          link
          2610 months ago

          They’re treating him with kid gloves because they’re trying to avoid an appeal. They know he’s going to appeal whatever verdicts he gets. But you can only appeal a conviction on the basis of a mistrial. Basically, you need to prove that your trial wasn’t fair. And one way to do that is to show that the judge was biased against you. So they’re avoiding giving him any ammo for his inevitable appeal.

          Because higher courts get more and more conservative as they go up, so his chances of getting a conviction overturned increase with each subsequent appeal. And if it makes it all the way to the SCOTUS, they’ll gladly light the constitution on fire to let him walk. So their best chance of having anything stick is to stop the appeals process before it can even begin, by refusing to give him any basis for an appeal. They’re doing everything they can to treat him with kid gloves, so the appeals court can’t go “yeah maybe the lower courts treated you unfairly.” It means that if a conviction happens, it’ll truly be ironclad.

          • @shalafi
            link
            English
            12
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Bingo. It’s like the Colorado judge who found Trump factually guilty of insurrection. That case was getting appealed, no matter what. But now the next court(s) in line has to take that fact into account, they don’t get to rehash or question it.

            tl;dr: All these things we’re mad about are brilliant legal maneuverings.

            • @zzzz
              link
              1210 months ago

              Yeah right. Like how Mueller was taking his time because he was building an air-tight case. I’ve been hearing this kind of thing since early in his presidency. I no longer buy that the “good guys” have a plan and will put a bow on it in the end.

            • @MotoAsh
              link
              1010 months ago

              A “brilliant” legal maneuver would be having a legal system where a fucking literal traitor doesn’t need to be treated with kid gloves… This entire thing is a fucking farce and no amount of “genius” political posturing will ever correct it.

            • @Boddhisatva
              link
              210 months ago

              That turns out not to be the case. Both sides are appealing that ruling.

              CREW is disputing Wallace’s final determination that Trump qualifies for Colorado’s primary ballot, while Trump’s team identified 11 issues for review from the final order, including but not limited to the finding that he engaged in an insurrection.

              So they are trying to overturn that factual finding. Trump will try to drag this out forever or until he can try and pardon himself.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Gag, fine, jail is the standard contempt workflow that most (terrible) people go through, but he still should have been gagged, then fined, then put in a cell all by the end of day 1.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      English
      26
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      IMHO, the judge is handling him with kid gloves so that, when he’s sentenced, he will have fewer avenues for an appeal. Because he wasn’t locked up and was given small (for him) fines, he’ll have fewer opportunities to mount miscarriage of justice claims.

      Edit: sentenced, not convicted.

      • Optional
        link
        810 months ago

        There’s always reasons why he gets away with it. Ultimately the reason is, “justice is a joke in this country.”

      • @Dkarma
        link
        010 months ago

        He’s already convicted. This is sentencing.

          • @Dkarma
            link
            010 months ago

            Correct. Finding of fact says he’s guilty.

        • @Metanoia
          link
          510 months ago

          He was convicted one one charge. This is the trail for all the other charges. This isn’t just for sentencing.

  • Optional
    link
    1810 months ago

    appeals court lifts gag order

    Facepalm

    appeals court reinstates gag order

    Slow clap

  • @RubberElectrons
    link
    1710 months ago

    Womp womp. Choke on your own words, you stale Cheeto.

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      510 months ago

      Sadly he’ll only end up coughing up a few measly grand instead.

      • @RubberElectrons
        link
        010 months ago

        Well, the earth will keep spinning and the rest of us will have to do our best to politically bury this clown.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The one-sentence decision from a four-judge panel came two weeks after an individual appellate judge had put the order on hold while the appeals process played out.

    Engoron imposed the initial gag order Oct. 3 after Trump posted a derogatory comment about the judge’s law clerk to social media.

    The post, which included a baseless allegation about the clerk’s personal life, came the second day of the trial in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit.

    The former president, now the front-runner for the Republican 2024 presidential nomination, contends the lawsuit is a political attack by James, a Democrat.

    Engoron later fined Trump $15,000 for violating the gag order and expanded it to include his lawyers after they questioned clerk Allison Greenfield’s prominent role on the bench, where she sits alongside the judge, exchanging notes and advising him during testimony.

    State lawyers had sought to tie Trump’s comments to an uptick in nasty calls and messages directed at the judge and law clerk.


    The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ugh
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    I’m staying pessimistic about all of the legal cases surrounding Trump because I don’t want to get my hopes up, but this is a very good sign. I’m sure they’ll continue to let him violate it with a light slap on the wrist at most, but it’s a bold move.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    The AP reports that the court made a one-line ruling, but didn’t quote it for some strange reason.

    • @Donjuanme
      link
      010 months ago

      Because it’s 1 “sentence” consisting of 3 paragraphs across 2 pages, and nearly entirely -speak gobblygook, summarized perfectly in the headline"gag order reinstated"

      The PDF is out there, I invite you to get any more information from it than what was conveyed by the article.

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    210 months ago

    I wonder how much ketchup is on the wall at the John Barron residence. For even the most minor of wrist slaps.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    Woop the news I’d been hoping for!