• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1041 year ago

    Not high art, but refreshing to see actual acting in a comic book movie.

    Especially after they made an entire island of warrior women do Israeli accents just to paper over the fact that their lead actress can’t fake a different one.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What is this supposed to mean relevant to the comment you’re responding to?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Specifically, Pacino’s “Cuban” accent was so bad that actual Cuban cast members were trained to mimic it just to help it be less glaring. Additionally, Pitt’s “pikey” was so nonsensical, the other actors couldn’t even begin to approximate it and the disconnect is visible onscreen in their reaction time to his lines.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            71 year ago

            and the disconnect is visible onscreen in their reaction time to his lines.

            I thought that was intentional, like part of his character, that he speaks nonsensically.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              Nope. Pitt “panicked” and leaned into nonsensical rather than accuracy (likely due to his shite accent in The Devil’s Own).

              • @RampantParanoia2365
                link
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                But it was part of the character. The other characters react to him with dialogue. He just couldn’t do *Cockney, so they improvised.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          He’s saying that his bar for high art is higher than “other comic book movies” but still pretty low.

          To use the metaphor from the meme, he’s swam in a lake, but still not the ocean.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    651 year ago

    I just didn’t watch this movie for years because I was thinking just like the reviewer here. This year I finally watched it and… it was ok. The biggest reason to see it was because I really like Joaquin Phoenix and I wanted to see the movie from which he won his Oscar.

    There’s a lot of things in his Joker performance worth a revisit: how he talks, and how he moves, is really unique and definitely worth the victory. I just wish he would’ve got his Oscar from The Master, which for me is a groundbreaking movie and has one of the best scenes of all time with Joaquin and Philip Seymour Hoffman in the jail cell.

    But he got it from the Joker, and I’m glad he got the recognition.

    • DrMango
      link
      231 year ago

      Joaquin carried the fuck out of Joker and his performance, as usual, was spectacular. Unfortunately, for me at least, that’s where the merits of the film ended. I get that it resonated with a lot of people so maybe I am just not in the right headspace to truly appreciate the message, but ultimately I share the thoughts of the reviewer in the OP on this one.

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        101 year ago

        It was a Taxi Driver remake that licensed a DC character instead of paying Scorsese. It was solidly okay.

        But Phoenix 100% earned the Oscar with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I fully agree with you. We also went to see Napoleon because of him and were left disappointed. Please hire him for a great movie, somebody! PTA is making a new movie, so maybe we’re lucky?

    • @wreckedcarzz
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      Worth the watch then? Looking to add some new movies to my collection

      • @jimmydoreisalefty
        link
        311 year ago

        Yes, worth the watch.

        Just keep expectations neutral, this one is also unique in that it focuses more on decline of society, dark movie.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        It’s a suspenseful movie showing miserable things. If that’s your thing then it’s worth the watch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Maybe for the first half, but their character development diverges at the end. Travis Bickle attempted to do something good, however misplaced, but the joker just wanted to watch the world burn.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            The way I see it, Travis thinks he’s doing something good, and succeeds in becoming a ‘hero’ purely by accident.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              That’s the beauty of the movie. He steps past the breaking point but his focus was on getting the girl out so all the violence is justified. But he’s not perfect, otherwise his true intentions would have been completed and he’d be recognized as the monster he really is. It’s all perspectives.

      • @MindSkipperBro12
        link
        81 year ago

        For me, I thought it was one of the greatest films I’ve ever seen in my life.

        • @Frozengyro
          link
          161 year ago

          I had someone tell me that, and was incredibly let down. Maybe I just didn’t get it.

          • ShustOne
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            I mean no offense to the previous poster but I feel like it was fine. A lot of people talked about Joaquin Phoenix being amazing but I felt like they just haven’t seen his amazing performances haha.

              • ShustOne
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Give them a shot some time. The Master is probably my favorite performance of his although it’s in a good not great movie.

          • @MindSkipperBro12
            link
            41 year ago

            That’s fair, I’d argue that a viewer being able to closely relate to the protagonist or a character in the film is what changes their view of the film.

            For example, I’ve heard a lot of people love the Black Panther movie and the antagonist. I personally never liked the movie, nor relate to the movie at all, but I can understand someone relating to being an oppressed minority in American urban cities and the desire to rise up.

        • idunnololz
          link
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I didn’t relate to anyone in the movie (that I can remember) and I still loved it.

          I really enjoyed it because of the immersion. I just thought it was good story telling and excellent acting.

          I didn’t really take the movie to have any deeper meaning. To me it was the telling of one version of the joker’s origin story, one that is more grounded and realistic.

          • murmelade
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I was confused about him being Batmans brother. Is that canon now, or was it just in one of the marvel multiverses?

            • idunnololz
              link
              31 year ago

              I don’t remember this at all in the movie. When was this mentioned?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                He confronts Wayne in the bathroom at a party/fund raiser, IIRC.
                His mother used to work for the Waynes and hints towards this throughout

                • idunnololz
                  link
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Wait why would that make them brothers?

                  I should add that I didn’t really care too much if the movie isn’t true to any source material. My enjoyment of the movie was of it as a completely self contained story.

            • Pietson
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Been a hot minute since I saw it but IIRC that wasn’t real

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        -11 year ago

        I bought the movie in UHD 4K DVD. I watched it one time and donated the DVD. I won’t be watching it again. Worth a watch? I guess? Maybe? Do you like feeling like shit after watching a movie? Then it’s definitely worth a watch. Phoenix is my favorite actor, and I think he’s the most talented actor in Hollywood, but I did not enjoy watching his psychosis.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Felt like the message of the movie was society is rotten, but protesting is even worse. Kinda lame.

  • @BigDaddySlim
    link
    English
    261 year ago

    I thought it was pretty good for a King of Comedy/Taxi Driver remake

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    I saw it in the theater and glad I did. What I saw on the screen was a reflection of my own mental problems. A lot of people didn’t see themselves up there, and that’s totally cool. But it’s pretty disingenuous to wave the movie off like it had zero meaning.

    And that werewolf scene is classic cinema.

  • @awnery
    link
    15
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      661 year ago

      I think they’re commenting on all the people who thought it was amazing because they’d mostly been exposed to Marvel movies.

      ps: I have no dogs in this fight

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          It’s DC.

          For a DC movie, it’s outstanding. Then again we are comparing it to BvS, Justice League and Flash, sooo

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          It was DC, but yeah. I mean I think Marvel movies can be a bit of fun, and Joker stands out as being quite different to most superhero movies which is why it got a lot of attention.

          Personally my favourite superhero movie is still Birdman.

          • Cornpop
            link
            English
            71 year ago

            The watchmen is a masterpiece.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                I kinda liked the change. I don’t think the squid would have made sense in the context of the movie without a ton of setup. And it was already a long-ass movie.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          21 year ago

          It’s not marvel and that shows

    • Pistcow
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Edgelords making quotes about ok comic book movies

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Why does every piece of media need to be the deepest thing ever? Or why do we have to assume media is trying to be? This to me sounds like when people call music pretentious simply because it’s a combination of something they don’t like and also not like things normally on the radio. It’s even weirder in a case like this when the movie is a blockbuster film and not some indie joint.

    • @Hugin
      link
      131 year ago

      In the case of this movie a lot of people were saying it was an important and deep move. So this review is more a reaction the tremendous over hype joker got from some groups of people.

      • RobotsLeftHand
        link
        01 year ago

        And in valiant battle against the edginess they just became more edge. Criticism doesn’t get much lower than basing the review on the “tremendous over hype” of others. That just makes the critic a tool.

      • @Klear
        link
        11 year ago

        If you expect ocean of course you won’t like swimming in a pool.

  • @yesman
    link
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You guys are crazy! Joker is a nuanced and thoughtful study on the ripple effects of sustained trauma and Joaquin Phoenix’s performance is perhaps the best of his carrier. No, wait, sorry I was thinking of “You Were Never Really Here” (2017)

    Anybody notice the Batman villain as social anxiety trend? Leger’s Joker channeled Islamic terrorists, Phoenix’s channeled lone wolf shooters, while Dano’s Riddler was an incel.

    Edit: i made a change

    • @madcaesar
      link
      11 year ago

      This whole trend of trying to make villains deeper and giving them reasons to be assholes needs to stop. It’s rationalizing asshole behavior. Plenty of people have shitty things happen to them without turning into monsters.

      • @yesman
        link
        101 year ago

        I’d say the ubermench protagonists who are assholes, but their behavior is justified by being superior is a bigger problem. Think of Sherlock, Rick Sanchez, or Tony Stark.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    The truly outstanding thing about Joker was the OST by Hildur Guðnadóttir. Other than that, it was…fine.

  • @Aarrodri
    link
    31 year ago

    I just want to say the comments in this thread are very interesting to read and thought provoking. Just taking a moment to appreciate this community.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i dislike that sentiment so much. no one is saying joker is a deep movie, you’re just too far up your own ass to be able to enjoy something “simple” for what it is. joker is a very decent movie with a great performance from joaquin, and anyone who praises it as the best thing of all time or labels it as the worst thing in cinema, are idiots. reject both extremes and enjoy the fucking movie. 1 star is just petty and embarrassing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      anyone who praises it as the best thing of all time or labels it as the worst thing in cinema, are idiots. reject both extremes and enjoy the fucking movie. 1 star is just petty and embarrassing

      Do you extend this generous view that “opinions must be firmly middle of the road” toward all movies or do you just expect others to be charitable with their opinions when it concerns a movie you liked?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Nah, I’m with them on this one. A one star review that consists of a single edgy one-liner is a waste of storage and bandwidth. It helps no one, it adds nothing.

      • @Beachgoingcitizen
        link
        01 year ago

        Im with them on this. Ive seen people post one star reviews for perfectly competent movies, just to pull the average down on review aggregator sites. It is embarrassing

  • Cornpop
    link
    English
    -131 year ago

    It really was a shit movie.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      I didn’t enjoy it because it was just so damn depressing, but I can’t say it was a bad movie. It did what it aspired to.