Apparently this reminder is needed.

It is a meme.

    • stinerman [Ohio]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      176 months ago

      In French if something isn’t functioning properly you say that “il ne marche pas.” Now, in my studies, “marche” means “walk.” So to me that says “it doesn’t walk.” I asked a native speaker about that and they told me, no, that is not what that means.

    • @jaybone
      link
      46 months ago

      You’re a homonym.

    • Dojan
      link
      36 months ago

      English should just adopt hanzi. All problems solved.

    • StametsOP
      link
      06 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • @Heavybell
    link
    English
    596 months ago

    Soldier, plug, varnish, wax seal, some dude, seal?

    • @SilentSilhouette
      link
      236 months ago

      Navy seal , rubber seal, wood seal wax seal, Seal Henry Olusegun Olumide Adeola Samuel, animal seal

      • @HessiaNerd
        link
        46 months ago

        Ah yes, the navy seal in the middle of the desert.

        • @coffeebiscuit
          link
          146 months ago

          And still people think global warming isn’t a problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Among the SEALs’ main functions are conducting small-unit special operation missions in maritime, jungle, urban, arctic, mountainous, and desert environments

      • @Heavybell
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        Is this a “get off my lawn” joke? Sorry, just confused. :P

        If it is, don’t worry, I’m sure my age has little to do with my ignorance. It’s probably more that I just don’t follow celebrities.

      • NoSpiritAnimal
        link
        26 months ago

        I think that’s famed character actor Morris Chesnut.

  • @Sylver
    link
    516 months ago

    Military, air filter, paint brush, wax seal, Mike Tyson, sea-lion!

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    256 months ago

    Three of those are the same thing and the other three are named after each other

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        96 months ago

        And the fact that it’s a marine mammal is a coincidence? No it’s a backronym much like every other law’s name

  • @mhague
    link
    246 months ago

    I don’t get how English is hard. I learned it when I was just a kid.

      • @Ziglin
        link
        4
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I think the above commenter was aware of that.

      • @lugal
        link
        16 months ago

        I hope you are joking because that’s not at all how it works. There is a certain age when you are capable of learning a language easily. This time window closes naturally. It has nothing to do with the problematic school system

  • @Treczoks
    link
    226 months ago

    Google for a poem called “The Chaos”. It starts with “Dearest creature in creation”. Read it out loud without errors.

    • @deus
      link
      19
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Here it is. I was going to paste the whole text in here until I realized what a monster of a poem it is.

      • @d00ery
        link
        86 months ago

        As a native speaker, dang, that’s not easy!

        A few words I’m not sure on.

        • @Treczoks
          link
          36 months ago

          As a non-native speaker, it took me a quite few trials to get things right. And it contained a shitload of surprizes.

          There is a reason this poem is called “The Chaos”.

      • @Treczoks
        link
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        And, have you read it aloud? ;-)

        But it is good that you provided the link instead of the text, as the link contains a load of additional information about the poem and its author.

      • @uid0gid0
        link
        26 months ago

        When tweetle beetles fight, it’s called a tweetle beetle battle.

        And when they battle in a puddle, it’s a tweetle beetle puddle battle.

        AND, when tweetle beetles battle with paddles in a puddle, they call it a tweetle beetle puddle paddle battle.

        AND, when beetles battle beetles in a puddle paddle battle and the beetle battle puddle is a puddle in a bottle they call it a tweetle beetle bottle puddle paddle battle muddle.

    • @EatYouWell
      link
      36 months ago

      Actually, that’s an argument for a more expanded vocabulary. You can use single words to consolidate.

  • @EatYouWell
    link
    186 months ago

    Fun fact, the word ‘set’ has 430 definitions.

      • @steventhedev
        link
        96 months ago

        If the set of definitions contains the word set, does the English language implode in a recursive cascade of paradoxes?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          76 months ago

          A set can totally contain itself. A better question would be: Consider a set, that contains all sets, that do not contain themself. Would that set contain itself?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            Yes, just relax the axiom of comprehension, allow U ∈ U and move on with proving things for fun and profit. No one said that you have to pick axioms that seem natural or intuitive.

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    146 months ago

    Come on, you can’t count Seal the musician… That’s not a common name in English speaking countries. I’ve never heard of anyone else named Seal

  • @FishFace
    link
    136 months ago

    English is easy. The hardest part about it, which some other languages also feature, is a poor correspondence between the written and spoken language.

    • @RadicalEagle
      link
      26 months ago

      That feels intuitively correct to me, but I’m not sure if I’d say any language is particularly “easy”. Language is complex, complicated and only makes sense in the context of understanding human communication. Although language is also more intuitive than we give it credit for.

      I think spoken Japanese is possibly “easier” than spoken English, but written Japanese (outside of digital media) is essentially impossible for me because I don’t have Kanji memorized.

      • @FishFace
        link
        56 months ago

        I mean yes it’s a bit under-nuanced to describe any language as “easy” or “hard”. The single biggest influence is whether you’re already familiar with a similar language. English is going to be much easier if you already know German; Japanese will be much easier if you already know Okinawan. And as you say, written and spoke language can be quite different.

        That said, I don’t think it is the case that all of the different factors trade off against one another perfectly. I would expect them to trade off against one another to an extent though, because I would imagine there are forces which cause overly complex languages to become simpler, and more simple languages to become more complex. (One aspect of complexity comes through redundancy, such as requiring agreement between inflections of words when the inflection only conveys information already imparted from the rest of the sentence. But extra redundancy can aid in understanding because the listener generally doesn’t hear everything perfectly)

        But yeah, some languages just have incredibly complicated and picky grammar, whilst others have relatively simple grammar. As an English speaker, Japanese grammar has lots of unfamiliar features but could still be simpler than Finnish, which also has lots of unfamiliar grammar but which is very complex.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -16 months ago

      I feel like English is fairly easy to get into and have a correct conversation level. But that it’s insanely hard to master.

      • @FishFace
        link
        16 months ago

        I have no reference for the relative difficulty of languages to master, except that I know that all languages are incredibly hard to master to the level of a native speaker.

  • anar
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    English is only “hard” because it is shit. There ain’t no rules for nothing. All the “rules” have exceptions, which have exceptions, which have have exceptions.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    126 months ago

    Damn. I keep being surprised by how many people take stuff online way too seriously. Good meme, you get my seal of approval

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -16 months ago

        it’s pronounced “hiccup” but some people don’t respect the spelling and write it phonetically.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 months ago

          I’ve never seen it written that way, love to read, was an EMT, went to college, etc… Just saying I missed that somewhere and often saw hiccup, even in EMT educational textbooks.

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      I’d argue that even cough and rough are different. There’s probably more.

      • @surewhynotlem
        link
        46 months ago

        Literally everyone says that word. They just pronounce it hiccup.

        • @Dexx1s
          link
          106 months ago

          No, we all say hiccup. FFS, googling “hiccough” essentially autocorrects to hiccup. If everyone spells it hiccup and also pronounces it hiccup, literally no one is using “hiccough”.

          • @surewhynotlem
            link
            36 months ago

            Sure sure. And you can spell through as thru as well. That doesn’t change the original spelling, or the fact that they’re pronounced the same.

            • @Dexx1s
              link
              06 months ago

              And you can spell through as thru as well.

              No you can’t. Not in the same way. “Thru” is an informal word, similar to writing “gud 2 c u”.

              How about you at least try something that’s not blatantly inequivalent. If I Google “thru”, what can I expect to find? If I run both through a dictionary, what can I expect to find? If I poll the general public on each, which one would be accepted as a proper spelling? What would I have to do to both “thru” and “hiccup” be treated as equals here?

              That doesn’t change the original spelling, or the fact that they’re pronounced the same

              I said nothing about an original spelling. But if you’re calling it the original spelling, you’re kinda just conceding that “Hiccough” is the original and “hiccup” is the current.

              • @surewhynotlem
                link
                36 months ago

                Thru is informal, today. Hiccup was informal years ago. Language progresses.

        • @Donebrach
          link
          06 months ago

          no one uses hiccough. it’s outdated and dead. Just as in the future no one will use “surewhynotlem” and will instead use the proper and more agreed upon spelling “donebrach”

  • @Ambiorickx
    link
    116 months ago

    Navy SEAL is an acronym. Doesn’t count.

    • @CurlyMoustache
      link
      116 months ago

      So? “Laser” and “radar” are acronyms, but we use them as words

    • @treesquid
      link
      96 months ago

      But an acronym that was intentionally made to be the name of the animal, so it’s just a duplicate, like all three of the non-singer seals, which just mean to lock something in or out. There are only 2 meanings of seal here, plus a singer who named himself after one of them.