• @RightHandOfIkaros
    link
    English
    53
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “We’re making a commercial work, so we want the audience to see it. I don’t care if they say, ‘I don’t get it,’ but I don’t want them to feel unnecessarily uncomfortable. On the other hand, if we make the work completely sterile, people’s immunity will be weakened, and they will all die. Therefore, there is a way of thinking that we should dare to take on the stigma and transmit harmful things to the public.”

    I mean, hard to disagree with his sentiment. Seems like classic article author not getting past the translated words and being pedantic. This was an article written because the author read a translated Japanese interview with a Japanese media outlet, NOT a direct interview themselves.

    Imagine if no entertainment or media ever showed content considered “unsafe” or “harmful.” So many masterpieces of artwork would just be deleted from existence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      But maybe they could show risque stuff just… as a normal part of the story? Rather than just grafting on panty shots of women who look distressingly young…

      It’s like having a national nudity day where it’s curiously just hot women who are pressured to go nude

      • @trashgirlfriend
        link
        English
        57 months ago

        But maybe they could show risque stuff just… as a normal part of the story?

        I mean isn’t that what kill la kill does?

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          Like the whole plot, yeah.

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          Kill La Kill is somewhat unique because the concept of nudity being considered shameful is core to the plot.

          I mean yeah it’s fanservice dialed up to 11, but at least they use it as a theme and motif rather than just grafting it onto an unrelated plot.