• @Zombiepirate
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      She worked to make my kids a target because she didn’t think it would impact her life.

      I don’t have any sympathy for anyone who did that.

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        I keep getting reminded of Serena Waterford when it comes to so many Republican women…

        • @Zombiepirate
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Maybe you should eat something.

          You sound a bit grumpy.

          We’ll talk after you’ve had your nap, okay buddy?

            • @Zombiepirate
              link
              English
              36 months ago

              Ah, so insulting my parenting was productive, but getting called on it was a bit too spicy.

              You truly are the bigger person.

                • @Zombiepirate
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I see, anything is fair game to insult so long as your interlocutor introduced the topic!

                  I taught my kids to take responsibility for their words.

                  You’ve apparently not learned that lesson.

                  Maybe you’ll grow up one day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      In your view, does anyone “deserve” mistreatment?

      Because being mangled by the machine you helped build to mangle people, kinda just seems like poetic irony.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          “Deserved” is a subjective qualifier though. It doesn’t really mean anything without reference to an ethical framework for context.

          Saying I deserve a doughnut, basically means I want a donut unless there’s a specific context that alludes to why you should be rewarded with a doughnut.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              46 months ago

              I don’t really think so, otherwise they probably would have said it. I think you’re just utilizing loaded terminology to suit your argument.

              It would be like seeing the guys from jackass injure themselves in a stunt, and then accusing people who witnessed it of being callous for not being sympathetic. “No one deserves to break their penis for entertainment purposes!”… Well, okay, I guess that’s a nice platitude. But that guy was swinging his dick at an angry bull, and no one was making him do it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I am so tired of this prescriptive bullshit on online forms. If you don’t see it then fine, you don’t see it. But don’t make up some nonsense about me to pretend I didn’t read what I read. We just disagree, it’s that simple.

                Sometimes people mean more than the words in front of you. It’s called nuance, implications, etc. People mean more than what they literally wrote sometimes. Yet for some reason when we are on forums people pretend that doesn’t exist, like interpretation can’t exist ever.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  46 months ago

                  Well, this would be fine if you weren’t attacking other people’s interpretations…

                  Usually when people witness a criticism they want to know the logic behind that criticism.

                  People mean more than what they literally wrote sometimes. Yet for some reason when we are on forums people pretend that doesn’t exist

                  I think that’s because the whole point of forums is to express your ideas through the written word. Expecting people in a forum to interpret your argument with nuance when you express none is idiotic.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -16 months ago

                    So the written word doesn’t contain nuance or implications? It’s never open to interpretation? That’s certainly a take. I am not going to be as dick-ish as you though and call you idiotic.