• @halcyoncmdr
    link
    English
    207 months ago

    That depends on if you see the current copyright system as far to start with. The current system is a far cry from how it was created and was co-opted by companies like Disney to maintain monopolies on their IP for MUCH longer than the system was supposed to protect.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 months ago

      This. If I’m not mistaken, the system was meant to operate like a hybrid between patents and trademarks. Iirc, things weren’t originally under copyright by default and you had to regularly renew your copyright in order to keep it. Most of the media in the public domain is a result of companies failing to properly claim or renew copyright before the laws were changed. My understanding is that the reason for this was because the intent was to protect you from having your IP stolen while it was profitable to you, but then release said IP into the public domain once it was no longer profitable (aka wasn’t worth renewing copyright on).

      Then corpos spent a lot of money rewriting the system and now practically everything even remotely creative is under copyright that’s effectively indefinite.

        • @polarbear
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          doesn’t Disney count as ‘the corpos’?

          • @AngryCommieKender
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It counts as a corpo. Not multiple corpos.

            Credit where credit is due.

    • @Lost_My_Mind
      link
      English
      57 months ago

      “With 3 simple circles, I dominate the planet!” ~ERB’s depiction of Walt Disney.