• @foggy
    link
    -25
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ah nice. Lawyers get ~99.5%

    That seems right. /s

    • Brokkr
      link
      824 months ago

      It’s FFRF lawyers though. They are already working at well below the high salaries that people typically associate with lawyers. They have these jobs because they believe in these causes and are trying to help the public.

      Besides, the plantiff wasn’t seeking to cash in on the situation, they just wanted equal rights/benefits to be provided for all religious groups, which it sounds like they got.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      754 months ago

      They got everything the satanic temple wanted, and they’re just costs. This wasn’t ever about the money, it was about making sure the constitution was followed.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      144 months ago

      People get mad at good points. I remember when Experian compromised millions of people’s private information. Apparently my SSN leaked forever is worth $7.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        It’s apparent that our data security was second only in priority to quarterly earnings.

        How this isn’t a cruelty case is beyond me.

      • @foggy
        link
        -15
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Uhh I didn’t say that.

        Idk, maybe 90/10 would be a good look.

        Not 99.95/00.05

        Just a thought idk. Maybe too progressive sorry.

        • @brygphilomena
          link
          224 months ago

          The temple specifically fights for $1 only. It’s not about the money and the lawyer fees aren’t a percentage in this case.

        • fmstrat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          Thats how taking on nonprofit legal council works. ST wasn’t trying to make money, just pay the wages of the lawyers.

        • @whoreticulture
          link
          84 months ago

          So you just think the temple should have asked for more? I don’t think that’s what they’re in it for.

        • @Triasha
          link
          -34 months ago

          That’s saying that they can’t be paid for cases that don’t have money on the line.

          • @foggy
            link
            34 months ago

            No, it isn’t.

            • @Triasha
              link
              14 months ago

              Then the Temple would have had to pay them. So only the wealthy can sue for non monetary reasons?